Addressing Beliefs in the Implementation of Artifical Intelligence in Visual Communication Design: Theory of Planned Behaviour Perspectives

Hening Laksani(1*)

(1) Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The current situation of social development demands digitalization in all aspects of public life. The use of technology in education has some potential for improving cognitive abilities that emerge as essential benefits in the form of emotional and social perspectives. In this regard, as a foundation of cultural and learning process, education may serve as a starting point for the competent and aware deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The descriptive qualitative study used to explore lecturers’ beliefs in the use of artificial intelligence for higher education especially in Visual Communication Design educational context. The data was collected through a semi structured interview with seven Visual Communication Design lecturers from state University in Surakarta. The result showed that the lecturers had positive beliefs towards the use of Artificial Intelligence in Education. According to the findings, the lecturers found that there were possibilities to have both advantages and disadvantages in the process. In doing so, the participants believed that AI was eligible to support cognitive skills although several factors can facilitate and hinder the implementation of the use of Ai in education.

Keywords


Artificial intelligence; digital; education; technology; visual communication design

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179 ?211.

Baker, T, L Smith, and N Anissa. 2019. “Educ-AI-Tion Rebooted? Exploring the Future of Artificial Intelligence in Schools and Colleges.” Retrieved May 12 (February): 2020. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Future_of_AI_and_education_v5_WEB.pdf.

Barakina, Elena Y., Anna V. Popova, Svetlana S. Gorokhova, and Angela S. Voskovskaya. 2021. "Digital Technologies and Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Education." European Journal of Contemporary Education 10 (2): 285-296. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2021.2.285.

Borg, S. 2001. Key Concepts in ELT: Teachers’ Beliefs. ELT Journal. 55(2). ISSN 1475-304

Chen, Lijia, Pingping Chen, and Zhijian Lin. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review.” IEEE Access 8: 75264–78. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510.

Cope, Bill, Mary Kalantzis, and Duane Searsmith. 2021. “Artificial Intelligence for Education: Knowledge and Its Assessment in AI-Enabled Learning Ecologies.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (12): 1229–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1728732.

Creswell, John W. and Cheryl N. Poth. 2018. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd edn. California: Sage. Honthaner, E. L.

Gilakjani, Abbas Pourhosein, and Narjes Banou Sabouri. 2017. "Teachers' Beliefs in English Language Teaching and Learning: A Review of the Literature." English Language Teaching 10 (4): 78-86. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133207

Gocen, Ahmet, and Fatih Aydemir. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence in Education and Schools.” Research on Education and Media 12 (1): 13–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2020-0003.

Heins, Caroline. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence in Retail – a Systematic Literature Review.” Foresight 17 (3). https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-10-2021-0210.

Hwang, Gwo Jen, Haoran Xie, Benjamin W. Wah, and Dragan Gaševi?. 2020. “Vision, Challenges, Roles and Research Issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 1: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001.

Jantakun, Thiti, Kitsadaporn Jantakun, and Thada Jantakoon. 2021. “A Common Framework for Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education (AAI-HE Model).” International Education Studies 14 (11): 94. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n11p94.

Karsenti, Thierry. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence in Education: The Urgent Need to Prepare Teachers for Tomorrow’s Schools.” Formation et Profession 27 (1): 105. https://doi.org/10.18162/fp.2019.a166.

Khader, Fakhri. 2012. Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs and Actual Classroom Practices in Social Studies Instruction. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2 (1).

Koc, Sevgi, and Hasan Basri Memduhoglu. 2020. “A Model Test towards University Students’ Cheating Behaviour in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behaviour.” Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences 15 (4): 727–48. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i4.5056.

Laksani, Hening. 2019. “Teacher’s Belief about Digital Literacy Based on Theory of Planned Behavior.” Teaching and Learning English in Multicultural Contexts (TLEMC) 3 (2): 63–73. http://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/tlemc/article/view/1269.

Rus, Vasile, Sidney D’Mello, Xiangen Hu, and Arthur C. Graesser. 2013. “Recent Advances in Conversational Intelligent Tutoring Systems.” AI Magazine 34 (3): 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v34i3.2485.

Utami, Tanti Kirana, Dedi Mulyadi, M Rendi Aridhayandi, Ari Septian, Ahmad Husaeni, Yuyun Yulianah, Saptaning Ruju Paminto, M Mumuh, and Hasbu Naim Syaddad. 2022. “The Influence of the Implementation of the Independent Campus , Freedom To Learn ( Mbkm ) Curriculum on the Implementation of Key Performance Indicators in Order To Realize Collaborative Learning At Universitas Suryakancana” 3 (01): 51–55.

Wang, Pei. 2019. “On Defining Artificial Intelligence.” Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 10 (2): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2019-0002.

Xu, Bingbing, and Ieva Margevi?a-Grinberga. 2021. “A Discourse on Innovation of English Teaching in China from the Perspective of Artificial Intelligence.” Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences 16 (5): 2313–23. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i5.6347.

Yükseltürk, Erman, Fatih ?lhan, and Serhat Altiok. 2022. “Preservice Teachers’ Views about the Use of Mind and Intelligence Games in Education.” Participatory Educational Research 9 (6): 398–417. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.145.9.6.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/jd.v10i3.17415

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Hening Laksani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


Editorial Office:
Institute for Research and Community services (LPPM)
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Address: Campus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Phone: (021) 7818718 – 78835283 ext. 123 
Work Hour: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM | Close in sunday and public holidays in Indonesia

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Desain is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View Jurnal Desain Statistics