WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN WRITING SKILL: A BRIEF REVIEW

Setiyowati Setiyowati(1), Hanna Sundari(2*)

(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta
(2) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The study presented here includes collectively selected research papers that emphasize written corrective feedback, particularly Direct Written Corrective Feedback and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback. Writing is considered the most challenging task for students because writing needs the student's creativity to form ideas of their minds into a form of a text. Some difficulties that EFL students in writing usually find are the lack of the knowledge to choose the appropriate vocabulary, and they also have some problems in grammar and syntax. To overcome these, Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) has been used widely to show students grammatical errors in EFL students' writing works and help EFL students minimize their errors. The Written Corrective Feedback also shows students' performance in enhancing their writing accuracy. Five selected research papers have been selected to give some enlightenment about the effectiveness of Written Corrective Feedback. The feedback was given by EFL teachers and lecturers who teach in Indonesia, China, Iran, Malaysia, and Thailand. The method that is used in this literature review study is thematic analysis design. These are divided into five themes. The themes are Participants, Treatment, The Treatment Length, Instruments and Writing Prompt, and The Effectiveness of The Written Corrective Feedback. The findings reveal various results in the use of Direct Written Corrective Feedback and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Baleghizadeh, S., & Dadashi, M. (2011). The Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on Students’ Spelling Errors. PROFILE Vol. 13(1). 129-137.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: a ten months investigation. Applied Linguistics Journal, 31(2), 193-214.

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107.

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371.

Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181-201.

Ferris, D. R. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: Michigan.

Han, Y. (2012). The Intra- and Inter-task Effectiveness of Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback. The Journal of Asia TEFL Vol.9 (2), 71-96.

Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing compositions errors: an experiment. The Modern Language Journal, 66(2), 140-149.

Miftah, M. Z. (2015a). Enhancing writing skills through writing process approach. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 5(1), 9-24.

Poorebrahim, F. (2017). Indirect written corrective feedback, Revision, and Learning. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol.6(2), 184-192.

Putra, M. S. (2011). Appropriate writing assessment, how do we do it properly? Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 1(1), 9-16.

Richard, J. C. & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching. United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Sabarun. (2011). Improving writing ability through cooperative learning strategy. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 1(1), 41-48.

Shirotha, F. B. (2016). The Effect of Indirect Written Corrective Feedback on Students’ Writing Accuracy. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 6(2), 101-118.

Tan, K. E., & Manochphinyo, A. (2017). Improving Grammatical Accuracy in Thai Learners’ Writing: Comparing Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback. The Journal of Asia TEFL, Vol. 14(3), 430-442.

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327-369.

Van Beuningen, C. (2010). Corrective feedback in L2 writing: Theoretical perspectives, empirical insights, and future directions. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 1-27.

Van, B., Catherine, G., DeJong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence of effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in the second language writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1-41.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/inference.v4i2.6552

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Published by:
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Address: Kampus A Building 2, 3rd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Phone: +62 (021) 7818718 – 78835283 | Close in sunday and public holidays in Indonesia
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM
Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm.

Creative Commons License
INFERENCE: Journal of English Language Teaching is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License