THE EFFECT OF TEACING TECHNIQUE AND CRITICAL THINKING TOWARDS STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL

Ermina Ermina(1*)

(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Abstract. The purpose of this research was to: determine the interactive effect of teaching technique and critical thinking towards students’ writing skill. The research method used was experimental one. Sample size of 80 students consisted of 40 for experiment class from SMK PGRI Sukamulya and 40 from SMK Bani Usman Manunggal for control class. The sampling technique used was cluster sampling. Research instruments were used to test the results of critical thinking (30 items) and writing skill scoring that had been tested valid and reliable. The used test was two-way ANOVA analysis the result showed: (1) There is a significant effect of teaching technique towards students’ writing skill at Private Vocational High School in Tangerang. It is proved by the value of sig 0,000 < 0,05 and Fo = 77,449. (2) There is a significant effect of critical thinking towards students’ writing skill at Private Vocational High School in Tangerang. It is proved by the value of sig 0,000 < 0,05 and Fo = 51,791. (3) There are any significant interactive effects of teaching technique and critical thinking towards students’ writing skill at Private Vocational High School in Tangerang. It is proved by the value of sig 0,033 < 0,05 and Fo = 4,725. This suggests that teaching technique and critical thinking contribute to the improvement of students writing skill.

Keyword: Teaching Technique, Critical Thinking, Writing Skill


Full Text:

PDF

References


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bellanca, (2007). a Guide to Graphic Organizer. California:Corwin Press.

Bromley, K., DeVitis, L. I. and Modlo, M. (1999). 50 Graphic Organizers for Reading, Writing & More. New York: Scholastic Professional Books.

Brown, D. (2001) Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, Second Edition. New York: Pearson Education

Butterworth, J. Thwaites.n (2013) Thinking Skill: Critical Thinking And Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ciascai, L. (2009). Using Graphic Organizers in Intercultural Education. Acta Didactica Nepocensia,

Cottrell (2005). Critical Thinking Skill. New York: Palgrave Macmilan.

Davies, M & Barnett (2015) The Palgrave Handbook for Critical Thinking in Higher Education. New York:Palgrave Macmillan.

Dye, G. (2000). Graphic Organizers to the Rescue! Helping Students Link—and Remember— Information. London:Teaching Exceptional Children.

Ellis, E. (2004). What’s the big deal about GO? Retrieved on January 23rd, 2010,http://www.graphicorganizers.com/images/stories/ pdf/Q&AGraphicOrganizers.pd

Ellwood, and Davis (2010) International Mindedness: a Professional Development Handbook for International Schools. London: Optimus Eucation

Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A. E (2000). The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Millbrae. California: California Academic Press

Harmer, Jeremy. (2004). How to Teach Writing.Kuala Lumpur: Longman

Hibbard, K. M., & Wagner, E. A. (2003). Assessing and Teaching Reading Comprehension and Writing K-3 (Vol. 2). New York: Eye on Education.

Housel, Debra J, Content Area Lesson Using Graphic Organizer. California. Teacher Created Resource.

Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2007). Graphic organizers in reading instruction: Research findings and issues. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19, 34–55

Knapp, Watkins (2005) Genre, Text, And Grammar. Sydney: UNSW Press.

Marzano, Pickering, Pollock,(2001), Classroom Instruction that works, Alexandria, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Mckim, Robert. (1980). Experience in Visual Thinking. California: Cole Publishing Company.

McPeck, (2015). Critical Thinking and Education. Britain: Routledge

Miller, and Babcock (1996). Critical Thinking Applied to Nursing. Michigan: Mosby

Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2001).The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts and tools. California: Foundation for Critical Thinking

Perles, Keren. (2012) Types of Graphic Organizer and Tips of Using Them with Your Students. Bright Hub Inc. Retrieved on October, 2012 from http//www.ePal.com/join.

Richard,Renandya (2002). Methodology In Language Teaching. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Rowson, J. (2012) The Power of Curiosity.United Kingdom: RSA Social Brain Center.

Singh, YK. Instructional Technology in Education. Ciang Mai: APH Publishing

Slavin, R. E. (2011). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. New York: Pearson.

Starkey, Lauren (2004). Critical Thinking Skill Success in 20 Minutes a Day. New York: Learning Express.

Vallis. (2010). Reason to Write: Applying Critical Thinking to Academic Writing. Charlotte: Kona Publishing and Media Group.

Vekiri, I. (2002). What is the value of graphical displays in learning? Educational Psychology Review, 14, 261-312.

Weigle. ( 2002) Assessing Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

William, R Bruce. (2015). Higher Order Thinking Skill. New York: First SKyhorse Publishing.

Wills. (2008). The Theoretical and Empirical Basis for Graphic Organizer Instruction. Alabama: The University of Alabama.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/inference.v1i3.5530

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Published by:
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Address: Kampus A Building 2, 3rd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Phone: +62 (021) 7818718 – 78835283 | Close in sunday and public holidays in Indonesia
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM
Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm.

Creative Commons License
INFERENCE: Journal of English Language Teaching is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License