Balancing Workload and Thesis Guidance: How Supervisors Provide Effective Feedback to Students

Masitha Rahma(1*), Ekaning Dewanti Laksmi(2), Yusnita Febrianti(3)

(1) Universitas Negeri Malang
(2) Universitas Negeri Malang
(3) Universitas Negeri Malang
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Workload affected the supervisors in giving feedback during thesis supervision and gave the impacts to the students’ process in completing their thesis. This research focused on finding out the strategy to ensure giving feedback during thesis supervision alongside the heavy workload. A case study research design was employed and three supervisors of graduate thesis of English Language Education in one of public universities in Malang, East Java, Indonesia were involved in this research. To collect the data, partially structured interviews were used. The data collected was analyzed systematically. It was found that some strategies were proposed by the participants. The strategies included holding face-to-face meetings, conducting virtual meetings, establishing consultation regulations, sending theses via email, scheduling specific times for providing feedback, and requesting students to provide reminder.


Keywords


Workload; Thesis guidance; Feedback; Supervisors’ strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrar, M., Fajaryani, N., Hutabarat, R. R., Failasofah., & Masbirorotni. (2023). EFL student teachers’ experiences in writing their undergraduate theses in Jambi. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 401-416.

Adenagbe, O. A., Edafiogho, O. A., & Olofin, S. O. (2021). Supervision and workload as determinants of postgraduate theses quality in Ondo state universities. Euro Global Contemporary Studies Journal, 1(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5048498

Almeatani, M., Alotaibi, H., Alasmari, E., & Meccawy, M. (2019). Thesis supervision mobile system for enhancing student-supervisor communication. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(6), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5048498

Arianto, M. A., & Wulyani, A. N. (2022). Self-Regulated Writing (SRW) strategies during the completion of dissertation: a case study. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 41(1), 154-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i1.40687

Arjulayana., Lastari, D. S., & Al-Manar, A. (2024). English department students’ metacognition awareness in completing mini-thesis. Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET), 8(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.8.1.15-32

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth.

Bahtilla, M. (2022). Supervisory feedback: supervisors’ reasons for not giving timely feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2083656

Bahtilla, M., & Oben, A.I. (2021). International students’ perception of research supervision in the Social Sciences: the case of three comprehensive universities in China. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1945554

Bakhou, B., & Bouhania, B. (2020). A qualitative inquiry into the difficulties experienced by Algerian EFL master students in thesis writing: ‘Language is not the only problem’. Arab World English Journal, 11(2), 243-257. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no2.17

Bastola, M. N. (2021). Formulation of feedback comments: insights from supervisory feedback on master’s theses. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 565-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1804985

Bastola, M. N. (2022). Engagement and challenges in supervisory feedback: supervisors’ and students’ perceptions. RELC Journal, 53(1), 56-70. doi:10.1177/0033688220912547

Bastola, M. N., & Hu, G. (2023). From the other side of desk: supervisors’ perceptions of supervisory feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 59, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.100965

Bayona-Oré, S., & Bazan, C. (2020). Why students find it difficult to finish their theses?. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 591-602. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.47

Baydarova, I., Collins, H. E., & Saadi, I. A. (2021). Alignment of doctoral student and supervisor expectations in Malaysia. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.28945/4682

Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Allyn & Bacon.

Brown, G., & Atkins, M. (1988). Effective teaching in higher education. Routledge.

Carter, S., & Kumar, V. (2017). ‘Ignoring me is part of learning’: supervisory feedback on doctoral writing. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1123104

Chugh, R., Macht, S., & Harreveld, B. (2022). Supervisory feedback to postgraduate research students: a literature review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 683-697. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1955241

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research. Pearson.

Dowling, R., & Wilson, M. (2015). Digital doctorates? An exploratory study of Phd candidates’ use of online tools. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1058720

Ebadi, S., & Pourahmadi, F. (2019). Exploring challenges in writing EFL master theses: students and supervisors’ perspectives. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 9(2), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.9.2.15431

Febrianti, Y., Navitas, P., & Winaris, N. (2023). Communication dynamics between first-year doctoral students and supervisors. Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI, 20(2), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v20i2.5735

Gezahegn, T. H., & Gedamu, A. D. (2023). Supervisors’ and supervisees’ perception and perceived practice of a process-oriented thesis written feedback: the case of Ethiopian universities. Heliyon, 9(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12865

Imperial College London. (2017, July). Mutual expectations for the research degree student supervisor partnership. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/faculty-of-engineering/electrical-and-electronic-engineering/public/phd/PhD-Student-Supervisor-Partnership.pdf

Marhaban, S., Puspitasari, Y., Mukminatein, N., Widiati, U., Sulistyo, T., Suhastyanang, W. D., & Muslem, A. (2021). Strategies employed by EFL doctoral candidates in dissertation completion. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 546-560. https://doi.org/10.24815/SIELE.V8I2.17694

Nangimah, M., & Walldén, R. (2023). How supervisors provide and students react to EAL thesis supervision: voices from Sweden and Indonesia. Front. Educ., 8, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1118436

Nurkamto, J., Djatmika., & Prihandoko, L. A. (2022). Students’ problems of academic writing competencies, challenges in online thesis supervision, and the solutions: thesis supervisors’ perspectives. TEFLIN, 33(1), 123-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v33i1/123-147

Rahardjo, D. (2021). Documenting communications and communicating documents: developing thesis online supervising in distance education. IKOMIK: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi dan Informasi, 1(2), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.33830/ikomik.v1i2.2379

Republik Indonesia. 2012. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta.

Rugut, C. K., & Chang’ach, J. (2023). Voices of supervisors on thesis supervision practices in universities in Kenya. The Educator, 3(1), 128-149.

Safitri, C. D., Azisah, S., & Nur, M. J. A. (2021). The analysis of students’ challenges to thesis writing at UIN Alauddin Makassar. English Language Teaching for EFL Learners, 3(2), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.24252/elties.v3i2.21013

Satriani, I., Resmini, S., & Fauziah, U. N. E. (2023). The online mini thesis supervision: students’ perception. Biormatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(1), 45-52.

Shinta, L. G. B., Astuti, U. P., & Ariani, N. (2023). College students’ preferences for written corrective feedback. ELT Forum, 12(2), 74-89.

Sitompul, S. S., & Anditasari, A. W. (2022). Challenges in writing academic research: an exploration of master’s students’ experiences. Getsempena English Education Journal, 9(2), 136-148. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v9i2.1805

Stappenbelt, B., & Basu, A. (2019). Student-supervisor-university expectation in alignment in the undergraduate engineering thesis. Journal of Teaching and Sciences Education, 9(2), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.482

Suparman, U. (2021). The implementation of the online thesis supervision during pandemic covid-19 at one of graduate and postgraduate programs in Indonesia. AKSARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 22(1), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.23960/AKSARA%2FV22I1.PP43-53

Taylor, S., Kiley, M., & Humphrey, R. (2018). A handbook for doctoral supervisors. Routledge.

Teklesellassie, Y. (2019). Views of summer TEFL postgraduate students and their supervisors on thesis supervision in the Ethiopian context. PASAA, 58(1), 131-165. doi:10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.58.1.6

Tladi, L. L., & Seretse, T. E. (2021). Students’ perceptions of postgraduate research supervision at Botswana Open University. Progressio, 42, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-5895/10001

Zaheer, M., & Munir, S. (2020). Research supervision in distance learning: issues and challenges. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 15(1), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-01-2020-0003




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i2.24504

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Masitha Rahma, Ekaning Dewanti Laksmi, Yusnita Febrianti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Publisher:

Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Department:

Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License