Exploring the Use of Semantic Mapping in English Language Teaching Classroom

Melisa Khoyyiroh Harahap(1), Sholihatul Hamidah Daulay(2*), Muhammad Dalimunte(3)

(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
(3) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The study examined the efficacy of employing semantic mapping as a method for comprehending and enhancing students' vocabulary proficiency. This study was conducted at SMA Swasta Al-Fattah Medan in the tenth grade students. This study investigates the implementation of semantic mapping as a vocabulary instruction strategy in English language teaching classrooms at the senior high school level, specifically focusing on Grade X students. Using a qualitative research design, the study explores both teacher implementation practices and student perceptions of semantic mapping through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis. Data were collected from three English teachers and their respective classes over one semester. The findings reveal that students demonstrate positive perceptions toward semantic mapping, with the majority reporting enhanced comprehension and vocabulary retention. Analysis of student responses indicates that semantic mapping facilitates vocabulary acquisition by creating meaningful connections between words and promoting higher cognitive engagement. The research also identifies successful implementation strategies and challenges faced by teachers, including time management and varying student participation levels. The study concludes that semantic mapping is an effective instructional tool that not only improves vocabulary acquisition but also increases student engagement and motivation in English language learning. These findings contribute to the understanding of effective vocabulary instruction methods in English language teaching and provide practical insights for educators implementing semantic mapping in their classrooms.

Keywords


Classroom; English language teaching; Semantic Mapping

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bolger, P.& Zapata, G.(2011). Semantic categories and context in L2 vocabulary learning. language learning,61 (2), (614-646)

Daulay, S. H., Damanik, E. S. D., Rahman, B. I., & Wandini, R. R. Reflina., Anggreni, R.,(2020). Sara’s Cooking Party Game as A Media to Enrich Students’ English Vocabulary. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(08), 15249-15256.

Daulay, S. H., & Adelita, D. (2023). Using Scrabble as a Gamification to Enhance Students’ Motivation and Vocabulary Acquisition: Teachers’ Perspective. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 7(1), 1-16.

Daulay, S. H., Siregar, D. Y., & Sulistia, N. (2023). Hello English Application to Improve the Students' Speaking Skills. Edulitics (Education, Literature, and Linguistics) Journal, 8(2), 21-28.

Daulay, S. H., Wandira, B., & Kurniati, E. Y. (2024). Professionalizing Your English Language Teaching: edited by Christine Coombe, Neil J. Anderson, and Lauren Stephenson, 2020, 435 pp., price€ 64, 99 (hardcover),€ 53, 49 (eBook), ISBN 978-3-030-34761-1 (hardcover), ISBN 978-3-030-34762-8 (eBook).

Devi, P. (2017). Effects of Semantic Mapping, Think Pair Strategies and GPA on Students’ Descriptive Paragraph Writing Achievement. The Journal of English Literacy Education, 4 (1), 14-26.

Dilek, Y. & Yuruk, N. (2012). Using Semantic Mapping Technique in Vocabulary Teaching at Pre-intermediate Level. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1531-1544. Doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.221.

Eppler, M. (2006). A Comparison Between Concept Maps, Mind Maps, Conceptual Diagrams, and Visual Metaphors as Complementary Tools for Knowledge Construction and Sharing. Information Visualisation. 5(3), 202-210. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500131.

Evelyn. H.& chewy. B.(1995) Vocabulary, Semantic and language education Cambridge: Cambridge University, p. 387

Fatima. (2004). Semantic Mapping technique, http://www.k12.nf.CalFatima/semmap.Accessed onNovember,23rd 2008

Fauzan, A., Jufriza, J. & Amri, Z. (2018). The Effect of Semantic Mapping in Teaching Writing Skill on Seventh Grade Students of SMPN 3 Batusangkar. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 301, 349-353.

Fernando, W. S, A. (2021). The Potential of Semantic Mapping to Develop the Vocabulary of Second Language Learners. Journal of New Frontiers in Education and Social Science, 1, pp. 1-13. https://elicit.com/notebook/48ce194e-2381-47a0-9721-320ecc007ef1#18127bf105a0cd3a781f3cbe97fa42b3

Harahap, A. W., Daulay, S. H., & Dewi, U. (2023). Using Scrabble Games to Enhance Students' ability at Vocabulary. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 10(2).

Harmi, H., Karolina, A., Fathurrochman, I., Fadila, F., Daulay, S. H., Apriani, E., & Supardan, D. (2022). Analysis of multicultural understanding and moderation of religion of PAUD teachers in Bengkulu province. Pegem Journal of education and instruction, 12(4), 128-136.

Jusmaya. A & Afriana. (2019). The Effectiveness of Semantic Mapping as Prewriting Activity in Argumentative Writing. Jurnal Basis, 6 (1), 3342. https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v6i1.1052.

Khairisya, T., & Daulay, S. H. (2022). Using Kahoot! as a Media in English Teaching: Students’perception. In International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture (ISoLEC) (Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 196-202).

Krisnawati. N. 2013. Using Semantic Mapping to Improve 7th Grade Students’ Reading Comprehension in SMPN 1 JETIS in the Academic Year of 2013/2014. Sarjana Thesis, Faculty of Language and Art State of Yogyakarta.

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McGraw Hill Companies.

Nurweni, A. (2018). English Teaching Assessment; Artificial and Authentic Assessment. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Nyoni. E. (2012). Semantically Enhanced Composition Writing with Learners of English as a Second Language (ESL). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2 (18), 264-274.

Pourfarhad, M., Azemy, F., & Hassani, L. (2012). Perception of international students on academic Literacy focusing on Speaking and Listening Skills in Malaysia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral sciences, 69, 197-205, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.399.

Sadeghi, K., & Taghavi, E. (2014). The relationship between semantic mapping instruction, reading comprehension and recall of Iranian undergraduates reading English texts. Mextesol Journal, 38(1), 1-13.

Sasabone, L. (2018). Applying semantic mapping to improve students’ reading comprehension. Seltics Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), 10-16.

Shafaa, Y. W., & Daulay, S. H. (2024). Teachers’ Perception On Project Based Learning Method In Teaching English Lesson. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(2), 2389-2398.

Sundari, A. G., & Daulay, S. H. (2024). Utilizing Semantic Mapping to Enhance Students' Understanding in Reading. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(1), 046-050.

Tanjung, A. P., & Daulay, S. H. (2022, June). Quizlet And Vocabulary Mastery: Students’ Perception. In English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings (Vol. 5, pp. 267-276).

Vadilah. S. T. (2011). Enriching Students’ Vocabulary Through Semantic Mapping. Sarjana Thesis, Faculty of Tarbiyah ad Teachers Training of Jakarta.

Williams. C.R.(1994.) Semantic Mapping Planning: A framework for effective, Reflective Teaching, teacher Development and teacher Research. Master of Arts thesis school for international training Brattleboro, VT377677

Yih, M. B. (2011). Semantic Mapping: A Visual and Structured Pre-Writing Strategy in The Process of Essay Writing. Academic Language Studies, 7 (2), 1-14.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i2.22643

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Melisa Khoyyiroh Harahap, Sholihatul Hamidah Daulay, Muhammad Dalimunte

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Publisher:

Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Department:

Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License