Exploring the Use of Semantic Mapping in English Language Teaching Classroom
(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
(3) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bolger, P.& Zapata, G.(2011). Semantic categories and context in L2 vocabulary learning. language learning,61 (2), (614-646)
Daulay, S. H., Damanik, E. S. D., Rahman, B. I., & Wandini, R. R. Reflina., Anggreni, R.,(2020). Sara’s Cooking Party Game as A Media to Enrich Students’ English Vocabulary. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(08), 15249-15256.
Daulay, S. H., & Adelita, D. (2023). Using Scrabble as a Gamification to Enhance Students’ Motivation and Vocabulary Acquisition: Teachers’ Perspective. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 7(1), 1-16.
Daulay, S. H., Siregar, D. Y., & Sulistia, N. (2023). Hello English Application to Improve the Students' Speaking Skills. Edulitics (Education, Literature, and Linguistics) Journal, 8(2), 21-28.
Daulay, S. H., Wandira, B., & Kurniati, E. Y. (2024). Professionalizing Your English Language Teaching: edited by Christine Coombe, Neil J. Anderson, and Lauren Stephenson, 2020, 435 pp., price€ 64, 99 (hardcover),€ 53, 49 (eBook), ISBN 978-3-030-34761-1 (hardcover), ISBN 978-3-030-34762-8 (eBook).
Devi, P. (2017). Effects of Semantic Mapping, Think Pair Strategies and GPA on Students’ Descriptive Paragraph Writing Achievement. The Journal of English Literacy Education, 4 (1), 14-26.
Dilek, Y. & Yuruk, N. (2012). Using Semantic Mapping Technique in Vocabulary Teaching at Pre-intermediate Level. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1531-1544. Doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.221.
Eppler, M. (2006). A Comparison Between Concept Maps, Mind Maps, Conceptual Diagrams, and Visual Metaphors as Complementary Tools for Knowledge Construction and Sharing. Information Visualisation. 5(3), 202-210. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500131.
Evelyn. H.& chewy. B.(1995) Vocabulary, Semantic and language education Cambridge: Cambridge University, p. 387
Fatima. (2004). Semantic Mapping technique, http://www.k12.nf.CalFatima/semmap.Accessed onNovember,23rd 2008
Fauzan, A., Jufriza, J. & Amri, Z. (2018). The Effect of Semantic Mapping in Teaching Writing Skill on Seventh Grade Students of SMPN 3 Batusangkar. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 301, 349-353.
Fernando, W. S, A. (2021). The Potential of Semantic Mapping to Develop the Vocabulary of Second Language Learners. Journal of New Frontiers in Education and Social Science, 1, pp. 1-13. https://elicit.com/notebook/48ce194e-2381-47a0-9721-320ecc007ef1#18127bf105a0cd3a781f3cbe97fa42b3
Harahap, A. W., Daulay, S. H., & Dewi, U. (2023). Using Scrabble Games to Enhance Students' ability at Vocabulary. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 10(2).
Harmi, H., Karolina, A., Fathurrochman, I., Fadila, F., Daulay, S. H., Apriani, E., & Supardan, D. (2022). Analysis of multicultural understanding and moderation of religion of PAUD teachers in Bengkulu province. Pegem Journal of education and instruction, 12(4), 128-136.
Jusmaya. A & Afriana. (2019). The Effectiveness of Semantic Mapping as Prewriting Activity in Argumentative Writing. Jurnal Basis, 6 (1), 3342. https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v6i1.1052.
Khairisya, T., & Daulay, S. H. (2022). Using Kahoot! as a Media in English Teaching: Students’perception. In International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture (ISoLEC) (Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 196-202).
Krisnawati. N. 2013. Using Semantic Mapping to Improve 7th Grade Students’ Reading Comprehension in SMPN 1 JETIS in the Academic Year of 2013/2014. Sarjana Thesis, Faculty of Language and Art State of Yogyakarta.
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McGraw Hill Companies.
Nurweni, A. (2018). English Teaching Assessment; Artificial and Authentic Assessment. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Nyoni. E. (2012). Semantically Enhanced Composition Writing with Learners of English as a Second Language (ESL). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2 (18), 264-274.
Pourfarhad, M., Azemy, F., & Hassani, L. (2012). Perception of international students on academic Literacy focusing on Speaking and Listening Skills in Malaysia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral sciences, 69, 197-205, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.399.
Sadeghi, K., & Taghavi, E. (2014). The relationship between semantic mapping instruction, reading comprehension and recall of Iranian undergraduates reading English texts. Mextesol Journal, 38(1), 1-13.
Sasabone, L. (2018). Applying semantic mapping to improve students’ reading comprehension. Seltics Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), 10-16.
Shafaa, Y. W., & Daulay, S. H. (2024). Teachers’ Perception On Project Based Learning Method In Teaching English Lesson. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(2), 2389-2398.
Sundari, A. G., & Daulay, S. H. (2024). Utilizing Semantic Mapping to Enhance Students' Understanding in Reading. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(1), 046-050.
Tanjung, A. P., & Daulay, S. H. (2022, June). Quizlet And Vocabulary Mastery: Students’ Perception. In English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings (Vol. 5, pp. 267-276).
Vadilah. S. T. (2011). Enriching Students’ Vocabulary Through Semantic Mapping. Sarjana Thesis, Faculty of Tarbiyah ad Teachers Training of Jakarta.
Williams. C.R.(1994.) Semantic Mapping Planning: A framework for effective, Reflective Teaching, teacher Development and teacher Research. Master of Arts thesis school for international training Brattleboro, VT377677
Yih, M. B. (2011). Semantic Mapping: A Visual and Structured Pre-Writing Strategy in The Process of Essay Writing. Academic Language Studies, 7 (2), 1-14.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i2.22643
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Melisa Khoyyiroh Harahap, Sholihatul Hamidah Daulay, Muhammad Dalimunte

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Publisher:
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Department:
Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License