THE EFFECTS OF INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT AND CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY TOWARDS STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL
(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This research is aimed at knowing the effect of intelligence quotient and critical thinking ability towards students’ speaking skill. The research methodology is quantitative research design with the use of a survey with multi-correlation technique using some samples from a number of population and using a test used for data collection. The number of the samples is two classes from two government colleges in Bogor, West Java. The result of the research shows that; 1). There is a significant effect of intelligence quotient and critical thinking ability towards students’ speaking skill at Government College in Bogor that was proven by the value of Sig. 0.000 < 0.05 and Fobserved = 130.848. Both independent variables had given a contribution of 84.8% to the students’ speaking skill. 2). There is significant effect of intelligence quotient towards students’ speaking skill at Government College in Bogor that was proven by the value of Sig. 0.000 < 0.05 and Tobserved = 4.884. 3). There is a significant effect of the critical thinking ability towards students’ speaking skill at Government College in Bogor that was proven by the value of Sig. 0.000 < 0.05 and Tobserved = 4.382.
Key Words: Intelligence Quotient; Critical Thinking; Speaking Skill.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. (Rev VI). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Arum, R., & Roska, J. (2011). Academically adrift; limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Azwar, S. (2009). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Jogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.
Bagheri, N. (2018). Critical thinking and autonomy in speaking ability: a case study. international journal on studies in english language and literature (IJSELL). 6 (5), 73-83.
Bailey, S. (2006). Academic writing a handbook for international student. New York: Routledge.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Longman.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: principles and classroom practice. New York: Longman.
Cottrell, S. (2005). Critical thinking skills developing effective analysis and argument. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Elder, L. & Richard P. (2016). The art of asking essential question. California: Rowman &Littlefield.
Facione, P. A. (2007). Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 9, 1-28.
Fisher, A. (2013). Critical thinking an introduction second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Florez & Cunningham M. (1999). Improving adult english language learners’ speaking skills. Available at: http:// www.ericdigests.org/2000-3/adult.htm. [accessed 20/12/2019]
Foresman, G. A. (2017). The critical thinking toolkit. Chicester: Wiley Blackwell.
Griffith, W.I. & Hye-Yeon L. (2012). ‘Performance-based assessment: rubrics, web 2.0 tools and language competencies’ MEXTESOL Journal, 36 (1). Available at http://mextesol.org/ [accessed 13/12/2019]
Grosser, M. M. (2013). The relationship between the critical thinking skills and the academic language proficiency of prospective teachers. South African Journal of Education; School of Educational Sciences. North-West University (Vaal Triangle Campus). South Africa.
Kafryawan, W. (2018). The influence of intelligence on students’ speaking skills. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies on Humanities, 1(2), 145-152.
Kayi, H. (2006). Teaching speaking: activities to promote speaking in a second language. In The Annual Review of The Internet TESL Journal, 12 (11). Available at http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Kayi-TeachingSpeaking.html [accessed 13/12/2019]
Mutakin, T. Z. (2019). Tuntunan praktis pengolahan data penelitiandengan bantuan program statistical package for the social sciences (spss) edisi pertama. Tangerang: Pustaka Mandiri.
Mutakin, T. Z. (2019). Tuntunan praktis pengolahan data penelitiandengan bantuan program statistical package for the social sciences (spss) edisi kedua. Tangerang: Pustaka Mandiri.
Maharani, O. (2016). The effectiveness of using two stay two stray as a technique in improving students speaking ability (a quasi experimental research at the tenth grade students of SMA Taruna Nusantara Magelang in the academic year of 2015/2016). ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v5i1.9889
Paul, R., Elder, L., and Bartell, T. (1997). The california teacher preparation for instruction in critical thinking: research findings and policy recommendations. State of California.
Thornbury, S. (2005). How to teach speaking. New York: Longman
Willingham, D. T. (2007). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach? American Educator, 8-19.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/inference.v4i3.8725
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Published by:
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Address: Kampus A Building 2, 3rd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Phone: +62 (021) 7818718 – 78835283 | Close in sunday and public holidays in Indonesia
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM
Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm.
INFERENCE: Journal of English Language Teaching is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License