A Linguistic Study of Euphemism and Dysphemism in Lois Lowry’s the Giver and George Orwell’s Animal Farm

Fajar Duriat(1*), Mashadi Said(2), Supadi Supadi(3)

(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(2) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(3) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study investigates the use of euphemisms and dysphemisms in Lois Lowry’s The Giver and George Orwell’s Animal Farm within the framework of Politeness Theory, focusing on how these linguistic strategies influence societal norms and individual roles. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method, which focuses on the detailed analysis and interpretation of textual data. The results demonstrate that euphemisms align with negative politeness and off record strategies to obscure unpleasant truths, while dysphemisms correspond with bald on record strategies to directly attack and discredit. Both novels strategically employ euphemisms to soften harsh realities and maintain societal control, while dysphemisms are used to stigmatize opposition and reinforce authority. The implication of this study is that it highlights how language shapes reality, enabling students to critically analyze linguistic manipulation. Moreover, by examining euphemisms and dysphemisms in The Giver and Animal Farm, students gain insights into control, power, and oppression, while exploring the connection between language and societal critique in dystopian literature.

Keywords


dystopian literature; societal control; language manipulation; authoritarian systems.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfarhan, Ins. Eqbal. A. (2024). The Influence of Literature on the Society. Print)

International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10886693

Ardyan, E. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif : Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif di Berbagai Bidang. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Green, P. (2021). Euphemisms in modern literature: A critical analysis of Lois Lowry's The Giver. Palgrave Macmillan.

Iswara, A. A. (2020). The Form and Use of Dysphemism in Hoax. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020), 509. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.005

Miller, S. (2022). Language control and societal influence: A linguistic approach. Penguin Books.

Noletto, I. (2024). Fictional Languages in Science Fiction Literature. Taylor & Francis.

Smith, G. W. H., & Jacobsen, M. H. (2022). The Routledge international handbook of Goffman studies. Routledge.

Thompson, H. (2019). Reader perception and language manipulation in literary texts. Bloomsbury Publishing.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/inference.v7i3.28222

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

  Pascasarjana
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Address: English Education Program, Campus A Building 2, 3rd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Phone: +62 (021) 7818718 – 78835283 | Close in sunday and public holidays in Indonesia
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM
Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm.

 

Creative Commons License
INFERENCE: Journal of English Language Teaching is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Badakslot

awan128

orca128

orca128

orca128

planet128