Patriarchal Ideology in Indonesian Social Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis
(1) Mulawarman University
(2) Mulawarman University
(3) Mulawarman University
(4) Mulawarman University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Using Critical Discourse Analysis as a lens, this mini research study investigates how patriarchal ideology manifests itself in Indonesian social media (CDA). This study examines interactions on several social media platforms to see how patriarchal norms and values are questioned, upheld, and negotiated in the digital world. Drawing on Teun A. Van Dijk's socio-cognitive method, the study investigates language and semiotic tactics that maintain or challenge patriarchal norms. Data collection included a purposive choice of 12 comments from a TikTok video chosen for their relevance to gender discourse and ideological assumptions. Key findings from theme and socio-cognitive analysis show that social media may both dispute and perpetuate patriarchal beliefs, with dominant discourses frequently preferring traditional gender standards. These findings highlight the impact of internet platforms on gender narratives and power dynamics. This study broadens our understanding of how social media might disrupt cultural norms and emphasizes the need for more inclusive and fair online portrayals.
Keywords
References
Al Samer, R., & Al-Maliki, A. H. (2023). Ideology in Language: Critical Discourse Analysis Approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(2), 356-366. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1302.14
D. Cahyani, & Henni Gusfa. (2020). Dismantling the Ideology about News of Expatriate Workers towards the 2019 Presidential Election in Indonesia (Study Critical Discourse Analysis Teun A. Van Dijk on Online Media RMOL.co and Tempo.co). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.5-11-2019.2292487
Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E. (2015). You should see this, LOL: A uses and gratifications study of YouTube commenters. *Computers in Human Behavior, 51,* 447-453.
Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E. (2015). Having it all? Feminist mothers, intensive mothering and digital media. Gender & Society, 29(1), 8-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243214554110
Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Social Media Update 2014. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014/
Ebo, S. (2022). A Critical Analysis of Gender Roles in Marriage in Igbo African Ontology. African Journal of Culture, History, Religion and Traditions, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.52589/AJCHRT-WPF8Q4KO
Humayun, M., & Sadiq, F. (2023). I am the Proof: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Power and Ideology in Aafia Siddiqui’s Speech. Journal of Pakistan Vision, 24(1), 114–131. Retrieved from https://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_vision/vol24/iss1/7
Jahanzeb, S., Mehmood, S., & Kazemian, B. (2024). A Corpus-Assisted Socio-Cognitive Analysis of Power and Ideology in Pakistani Social Media Discourse. Discourse, Context & Media, 61, 100775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100775
Keller, J. (2015). *Here’s to the mothers who don’t matter: Father’s Day on mommy blogs*. Social Media + Society, *1*(1), 2056305115588474.
Keller, J. (2015). Here comes the mom judge: Mommy bloggers, class, and the intensification of mothering. Women’s Studies in Communication, 38(2), 151 172. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2015.1015176
Khalil, M. (2020). A Pragma-Semantic Model for Analysing Ideological Manipulation in Political Media Discourse. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(4), 208-223. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.4.18
Khirjan Nahdi, & Muh Taufiq. (2023). Nationality Discursive of Hamzanwadi: A Socio-Cognitive Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) Perspective of Teun A. Van Dijk. In Migration Letters. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20i5.4760
Marwick, A. (2013). *Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age*. Yale University Press.
Mansour, A. W., Mansur, V., Banat, S., & Banat, M. M. (2024). Balcony of Disgrace: The Intersection of Patriarchy and Honor in Arab Societies. World Journal of English Language, 14(4), 69. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n4p69
Marwick, A. E. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. Yale University Press.
Merrita, R. (2021). Critical Discourse Analysis on Jokowi’s Speech in Opening Asian Games 2018. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(3), 505-520. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v6i3.714
Mullet, J. (2018). Introducing Critical Discourse Analysis in Educational Research. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Öztürk, C. (2022). Revisiting the islam-patriarchy nexus: Is religious fundamentalism the central cultural barrier to gender equality? Zeitschrift Für Religion, Gesellschaft Und Politik, 7(1), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-022-00130-3
Raffone, A. (2022). Disability Hate Speech on TikTok: A Digital Critical Discourse Analysis. Routledge.
Richardson, J. (2016). #BlackLivesMatter: Constructing a Black Counterpublic Sphere on Twitter. *Social Media + Society, 2*(3), 2056305116671044.
Richardson, L. (2016). #BlackLivesMatter: A rhetorical analysis of social media’s role in the construction of social movement rhetoric. The Howard Journal of Communications, 27(4), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2016.1207818
Shubhangi M. Hiwarkhedka & Dr. Anshu Sharma. (2024). Patriarchal Dominance in English Literature. International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering and Management (IRJAEM), 2(04), 1228–1231. https://doi.org/10.47392/IRJAEM.2024.0165
Sobieraj, S., & Berry, J. M. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs and talk radio. Political Communication, 28(1), 19-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2011.534231
Song, S. (2024). Exploring Contemporary Chinese Women’s Views on Love, Marriage, and the Fear of Marriage. Communications in Humanities Research, 25(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/25/20231867
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schäffner & A. L. Wenden (Eds.), Language and Peace (pp. 17–33). Dartmouth Publishing.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. SAGE Publications.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Aims of critical discourse analysis. *Japanese Discourse, 1*(1), 17-27.
Wibowo, S. S., & Lililacs, A. (2022). Gender Equality in E-Sports: A Transitivity Analysis in Saloni Pawar’s Achievement Posts. Lililacs Journal : English Literature, Language, and Cultural Studies Journal, 2(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.21009/lililacs.021.04
Xu, R. (2023). Public Attitudes Toward Interracial Relationships: A Case Study on Gender Comparison. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 23(1), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/23/20230440
Yesufu, S. (2022). The scourge of gender-based violence (GBV) on women plaguing South Africa. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, 1, 96–100. https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2022.002261
Yewande, T., & Olawunmi, A. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Cultural Beliefs and Practices on Women’s Education in Northern Nigeria. Journal of Education Review Provision, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.55885/jerp.v3i1.191
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i2.26099
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dzunie Masruroh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Publisher:
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Department:
Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License