Masters of English Study Program Curriculum Evaluation: A Review of Technology Integration inLearningProcess

Bani Amirul(1*), Reflina Reflina(2)

(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The research deals with Masters English Program Curriculum Evaluation: A Review of Technology Integration in Learning Process. The objective of the study was: (1) to explain how technology integration was implemented by all lecturers in Masters English Program on learning process; (2) to find out the reasons why the technologies integration was implemented by some lecturers in Masters English Program on learning process. The research was conducted by using descriptive qualitative design. The data were collected by observing and interview 6 lecturers who teach in Master of English Tadris Study Program. The data were collected through observation and interview. The technique of data analysis was interactive model. The finding of this study revealed that: (1) The integration of technology that occurs in learning is still not optimal. There are still activities that are less applied in the learning process such as the absence of interactivity and lack of student involvement in the learning process; (2) all lecturers concur on the necessity of integrating technology into the learning process, believing it facilitates a more efficient educational experience and ensures that they remain current and responsive to contemporary demands. And also, they still understand conceptually what technology integration is, but understanding in the application in learning by integrating technology is still not understood deeply.

Keywords



Full Text:

PDF

References


Adellia, Y., & Prajawinanti, A. (2021). Implementasi Model Evaluasi CIPP Pada Pelaksanaan Program Kelompok Belajar TBM Leshutama Era Pandemi Covid-19. Pustaka Karya: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 9(2), 1428.

Bogdan, Robert C. and Biklen, Sari Knop. 1982. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Djaali dan Pudji Muljono, Pengukuran Dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta : Grasindo, 2008.

Finc, Curtis, R & Cruncilton. John R, Curriculum Development in Vocational and Technichal Education: Planning, Content, and Implementation. (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc,1979), 45

Forey, G., & Cheung, L. M. E. (2019). The benefits of explicit teaching of language for curriculum learning in the physical education classroom. English for Specific Purposes, 54, 91109.

Hasan, P. D. (2008). Evaluasi Kurikulum. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Habibi, Mundilarto, Jumadi, J., Gummah, S., Ahzan, S., & Prasetya, D. S. B. (2020). Project brief effects on creative thinking skills among low-ability pre-service physics teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(2), 415420.

KEMENRISTEKDIKTI. Retrieved from https://lldikti11.ristekdikti.go.id/download/pdf/693

Kurniawati, E. W. (2021). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Perspektif Model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). Jurnal GHAITSA Islamic Education Jurnal, Volume 2(1), 24. https://doi.org/19-25.

Lau, D. C. M. (2001). Analysing the curriculum development process: three models. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 9 (1), 29-44.

Luke, B., & Hogarth, K. (2011). Developing and enhancing independent learning skills: Using video tutorials as a means of helping students help themselves. Acounting Research Journal, 24(3), 290-310.

Mubai, A., Jalinus, N., Ambiyar, A., Wakhinuddin, W., Abdullah, R., Rizal, F., & Waskito, W. (2021). Implementasi Model Cipp Dalam Evaluasi Kurikulum Pendidikan Teknik Informatika. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(4), 13831394

Muji, A. P., Gistituati, N., Bentri, A., & Falma, F. O. (2021). Evaluation of the implementation of the sekolah penggerak curriculum using the context, input, process and product evaluation model in high schools. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 7(3), 377.

Nana Syaodih Sukmadinata, Dasar-dasar Pengembangan Kurikulum Perguruan Tinggi. (Makalah dalam Lokakarya Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi IAIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung 2003).

Neldawati, N., & Yaswinda, Y. (2022). Evaluasi CIPP Penerapan Permendikbud 137 dan 146 Tahun 2014 di Kecamatan Sijunjung. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(4), 29542961.

Nurdin, Syafruddin, Kurikulum & Pembelajaran. (Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, 2016) 50.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan 81 tahun 2013 Tentang Implementasi Kurikulum. Jakarta: Kemendikbud

Peraturan Presiden No. 8 Tahun 2012. Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia. Jakarta: Presiden Republik Indonesia

Presiden RI, 12 tahun 2012, Pendidikan Tinggi. (10 Agustus 2012).

Presiden RI, 20 tahun 2003, Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. (8 Juli 2003).

Rahmawati, L. E., Wahyudi, A. B., Purnanto, A. W., Latifa, R., & Purnomo, E. (2022). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Mata Kuliah Wajib Bahasa Indonesia di Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah dan Aisyiah Menggunakan Model CIPP. Imajeri: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(2), 92102.

Rosyada, D. (2004, November 15). Paradigma Pendidikan Demokratis Sebuah Modal Masyarakat dalam Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Suryadi, Ade. (2007). Pemanfaatan ICT dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh, Volume 8, Nomor 1, Maret 2007, 83-98.

Tim Pengembang Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi. (2017). KKNI dan SN-Dikti PERPRES 08/2012 & PERMENRISTEKDIKTI 44/2015. Jakarta:

Zainal Arifin, Konsep dan Model Pengembangan Kurikulum, (Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset, 2017), 80-81.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i2.25907

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Bani Amirul

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Publisher:

Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Department:

Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License