Digital Dialogue: Leveraging Microsoft Word for Effective Peer Feedback

Nurul Puspita(1*)

(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Peer feedback is a significant instructional technique in the learning process, providing students with varied perceptions and insights to expand their work. In the digital age, Microsoft Word provides numerous features that can increase the effectiveness of peer feedback. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to explore how students can utilize Microsoft Word for providing and receiving constructive peer feedback. This research would focus on understanding and interpreting the meaning of interpretation, which is qualitative research. Observations and document analysis would be used to gather comprehensive data on the use of Microsoft Word. In addition, the results of the data would be analyzed iteratively. In conclusion, Microsoft Word offers a wide range of capabilities that help improve students' peer review processes. The impact of the research lies on the use of tools like "Track Changes," a commenting tool, a comparison feature, a word count, grammar check, and collaboration tools, students can enhance their writing abilities, participate in meaningful discussions, and cultivate a feedback-friendly environment.


Keywords


digital dialogue; Microsoft word; peer feedback

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abuseileek, A., & Abualsha’r, A. (2014). Using peer computer-mediated corrective feedback to support efl learners’ writing. Language Learning and Technology, 18(1).

Armstrong, C. (2022). Key Methods Used in Qualitative Document Analysis. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3996213

Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2019). Introduction_to_Research_in_Education.

Basalama, N. (2015). THE STUDENTS’ WRITING DIFFICULTIES IN WRITING AN ESSAY BASED ON COGNITIVE PROCESS.

Chapelle, C. A., & Sauro, S. (2017). Introduction to the Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning. In The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 1–9). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069.ch1

Chen, T. (2016). Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: a research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 365–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.960942

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design : choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

Dagnew Chekol, A. (2020). Investigating the Influence of Using Peer Feedback on EFL Students’ Speaking Achievement and Their Perceptions Towards Peer Feedback. Arabic Language, Literature & Culture, 5(3), 23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.allc.20200503.11

Delisle, D. S. (2017). Peer Feedback in the Classroom.

Donald, Ary, et al. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Ary%2C+D.%2C+Jacobs%2C+L.+C.%2C+Irvine%2C+C.+K.+S.%2C+%26+Walker%2C+D.+%282018%29.+Introduction+to+research+in+education.+Cengage+Learning.&btnG=

Dye, T. (2024). Qualitative Data Analysis: Step-by-Step Guide (Manual vs. Automatic) | Thematic. https://getthematic.com/insights/qualitative-data-analysis/

Elboshi, A. (2021). Web-Enhanced Peer Feedback in ESL Writing Classrooms A Literature Review. English Language Teaching, 14(4), 66. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n4p66

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. Sage.

Kusumaningrum, S. R., Cahyono, B. Y., & Prayogo, J. A. (2019). The effect of different types of peer feedback provision on EFL students’ writing performance. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12114a

Maysuroh, S., & Ilham Maryadi, L. (2017). Students" English Writing Process and Problems: A Case Study at Hamzanwadi University. Voices of English Language Education Society, 1(1).

Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). What is purposive sampling?| Definition & examples. Scribbr.

Pham, V. P. H. (2021). The Effects of Collaborative Writing on Students’ Writing Fluency: An Efficient Framework for Collaborative Writing. SAGE Open, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021998363

Pricilia Yulanda, E., & Penelitian Mahasiswa Indonesia, J. (2023). A Literature Review: Microsoft Word in Improving Writing Skill during Hybrid Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa Indonesia, 3.

Qualitative Research Methods, Part 3 of 4: Qualitative Observation. (2024). https://ligresoftware.com/2023/07/26/qualitative-research-methods-part-3-of-4-qualitative-observation/

Sa’adah, A. R. (2020). Writing Skill in Teaching English: An Overview. EDUCASIA, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v19i1.1506

Salehi, Dr. H., & Amiri, B. (2019). Impacts of Using Microsoft Word (MS) Software on Iranian EFL Lecturers’ Grammar Knowledge. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.4.1.1

Team, M. (2014). Insert, delete, or change a comment - Microsoft Support. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/insert-delete-or-change-a-comment-5cb1af25-4dfe-4484-9713-2c80391ecf12

Tianotak, U. S. (2021). The Challenges of Peer Feedback in EFL Writing Classroom: Viewed from Students’ Perspectives. English Department of UMMU Journal (EDU Journal), 1(2). http://www.jurnal.ummu.ac.id/index.php/edu




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i1.24268

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Nurul Puspita

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

scope isjd

Portal Garuda Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Web
Analytics
View My Stats

Flag Counter