English Curricula in ASEAN Selected Countries: A Comparative Study

Cicih Nuraeni(1*), Agus Priadi(2), Nenden Sri Lengkanawati(3)

(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia; Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
(2) Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


To ensure the development of the ASEAN Economic Community, ASEAN countries must use English as the common language of business, education, and social life. Indeed, several ASEAN nations have embraced English as a second language, but many also consider English to be a foreign language. Especially in the field of education, adjustments to the English curriculum have also been implemented. The curriculum is designed to meet the educational goals of a nation as a set of plans and instructions regarding objectives, content, and learning materials, as well as the methodology used as a direction for completing learning activities. This study compares the English curricula in ASEAN selected countries at the university level. A research-based paper was used as the research approach. The findings indicated that the English curriculum is implemented differently in the four ASEAN nations of Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Malaysia. English goals and objectives, materials and content, method, and assessments are all compared as a foundation for curriculum development of university level in Indonesia. This study suggests that more research be conducted to compare the English curricula of countries that use English as a Second Language (ESL) so that it might be adopted by nations that use English as a Foreign Language (EFL).

Keywords


English Language Curriculum; EFL; ESL; ASEAN Countries; Comparative Study

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, J. U. (2010). Documentary research method: New dimensions. Indus Journal of Management & Social Sciences, 4(1), 1-14.

Bajada, C., Kandlbinder, P., & Trayler, R. (2019). A general framework for cultivating innovations in the higher education curriculum. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(3), 465-478.

Bernardo, A. S. (2017). Philippine English in the ESL classroom: A much closer look. Philippine ESL Journal, 19(2), 117-144.

Bin Mubayrik, H. F. (2020). New trends in formative-summative evaluations for adult education. Sage Open, 10(3), 2158244020941006.

Bui, H. P. (2023). Vietnamese University EFL teachers’ and students’ beliefs and teachers’ practices regarding classroom assessment. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 1-16.

Cavallaro, F., & Ng, B. C. (2014). Language in Singapore: From Multilingualism to English Plus. Challenging the monolingual mindset, 156(33), 9781783092529-005.

Chanpet, P., Chomsuwan, K., & Murphy, E. (2020). Online project-based learning and formative assessment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25, 685-705.

Clark, I. (2015). Formative assessment: Translating high-level curriculum principles into classroom practice. Curriculum Journal, 26(1), 91-114.

Crocco, O. S., & Bunwirat, N. (2014). English in ASEAN: Key effects. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 22(2), 22-27.

Ekawati, Y. N. (2016). The implementation of curriculum 2013: A case study of English teachers’ experience at SMA Lab School in Indonesia. English Language Learning Development (ELLD) Journal, 7(1), 84-90.

Fung, D. (2017). A connected curriculum for higher education (p. 182). Ucl Press.

Goodson, I. F. (2013). School subjects and curriculum change. Routledge.

Izza, A. Z., Falah, M., & Susilawati, S. (2020). Studi literatur: Problematika evaluasi pembelajaran dalam mencapai tujuan pendidikan di era merdeka belajar. Prosiding Konferensi Ilmiah Pendidikan, 1, 10-15.

Junaidi, A., & Wulandari, D. (2020). Buku panduan penyusunan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi di era industri 4.0 untuk mendukung merdeka belajar-kampus merdeka.

Kobayashi, Y. (2017). ASEAN English teachers as a model for international English learners: Modified teaching principles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 682-696.

Kupperschmidt, B. R., & Burns, P. (1997). Curriculum revision isn't just change: It's transition!. Journal of Professional Nursing, 13(2), 90-98.

Luthfiyyah, R., Aisyah, A., & Sulistyo, G. H. (2021). Technology-enhanced formative assessment in higher education: A voice from Indonesian EFL teachers. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 6(1), 42-54.

Macalister, J., & Nation, I. P. (2019). Language curriculum design. Routledge.

McFadden, J. R., & Roehrig, G. H. (2017). Exploring Teacher Design Team Endeavours While Creating An Elementary-Focused STEM-Integrated Curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, 1-22.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. In Qualitative data analysis: a sourcebook of new methods (pp. 263-263).

Nguyen, T. (2017). Vietnam’s national foreign language 2020 project after 9 years: a difficult stage. In The Asian Conference on Education & International Development (pp. 443-464).

Ornstein, A. C., Levin, D. U., Gutek, G. L., & Vocke, D. E. (2011). Foundations of education. USA: Wadsworth CENGAGE Learning.

Othman, M., Sahamid, H., Zulkefli, M. H., Hashim, R., & Mohamad, F. (2015). The effects of debate competition on critical thinking among Malaysian second language learners. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 23(4), 656-664.

Phongploenpis, Sasiporn. (2019). A Comparative Study of English Language Teaching in Thailand and Other ASEAN Countries. International Journal of Management and Applied Science 5(3):35–40.

Pham, C. (2022). General English Programs in Tertiary Education in Vietnam. Language Related Research, 13(5), 169-196.

Ponnusamy, L., & Gopinathan, S. (2013). Singapore: Education in Transition. Education in South-East Asia, 20, 233.

Prideaux, D. (2003). ABC of Learning and Teaching in Medicine. BMJ, 326(1), 268-70.

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge university press.

Royani, A., Maknun, L. L., Susiawati, I., & Umbar, K. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of Learning Outcomes in The Faculty of Education in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 3138-3146.

Sari, N., Dewi Kartini Ompusunggu, V., & Daliani, M. (2020). Analisis Penggunaan

Media Google Classroom terhadap Proses Belajar Mengajar pada Mahasiswa

PGSD Universitas Quality Selama Masa Bencana Pandemi Covid-19 . Journal of

Education and Teaching (JET), 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v1i1.6

Sari, N., Dewi Kartini Ompusunggu, V., & Daliani, M. (2020). Analisis Penggunaan

Media Google Classroom terhadap Proses Belajar Mengajar pada Mahasiswa

PGSD Universitas Quality Selama Masa Bencana Pandemi Covid-19 . Journal of

Education and Teaching (JET), 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v1i1.6

Sari, N., Ompusunggu, V. D. K., & Daliani, M. (2020). Analisis Penggunaan Media Google Classroom terhadap Proses Belajar Mengajar pada Mahasiswa PGSD Universitas Quality Selama Masa Bencana Pandemi Covid-19. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 1(1), 1-8.

Setiawan, B. (2020). The anxiety of educational reform and innovation: bridging of top-down and bottom-up strategies within practice educational reform of curriculum in Indonesia. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(2), 87-96.

Simpson, J. (2011). Integrating project-based learning in an English language tourism classroom in a Thai university (Doctoral dissertation, Australian Catholic University).

Su, S. W. (2012). The Various Concepts of Curriculum and The Factors Involved in Curricula-Making. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(1), 153-158.

Sulaiman, T., Kotamjani, S. S., Rahim, S. S. A., & Hakim, M. N. (2020). Malaysian Public University Lecturers' Perceptions and Practices of Formative and Alternative Assessments. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 379-394.

Surani, D. (2019, May). Studi literatur: Peran teknolog pendidikan dalam pendidikan 4.0. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 456-469).

Suryaman, M. (2020, October). Orientasi pengembangan kurikulum merdeka belajar. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra (pp. 13-28).

Tieocharoen, W., & Rimkeeratikul, S. (2019). Learning strategies and teaching methods in Thai and Vietnamese universities. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 10.

Thirusanku, J., & Yunus, M. M. (2014). Status of English in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 10(14), 254.

Waluyo, B. (2020). Learning outcomes of a general English course implementing multiple e-learning technologies and active learning concepts. Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(1), 160.

Weerasinghe, I. S., & Fernando, R. L. (2017). Students' satisfaction in higher education. American Journal of educational research, 5(5), 533-539.

Wright, G. B. (2011). Student-centered learning in higher education. International journal of teaching and learning in higher education, 23(1), 92-97.

Zacharias, N. T. (2012). Qualitative research methods for second language education: A coursebook. UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing

Zein, S. (2022). English as a subject in basic education (ESBE) in ASEAN: A comparative study. British Council.

Internet Resources

www.asean.org.

www.ef.com/epi

www.mhesi.go.th

www.mohe.gov.my

https://en.moet.gov.vn

Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology. (2022). Kenali Kurikulum Merdeka, Tingkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. Retrieved from https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id

Ministry of Education and Culture Directorate General of Higher Education. (2022). Latar Belakang Kampus Merdeka. Retrieved from https://kampusmerdeka.kemdikbud.go.id/web/about/latar-belakang




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v8i2.18038

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 SCOPE : JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

scope isjd

Portal Garuda Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Web
Analytics
View My Stats

Flag Counter