Utilizing Artificial Intelligence-based Paraphrasing Tool in EFL Writing Class: A Focus on Indonesian University Students’ Perceptions

Mufida Syahnaz(1*), Rahmah Fithriani(2)

(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to investigate students’ perception of QuillBot utilization in an EFL academic writingcourse. This phenomenological case study involved 20 sixth-semester students majoring in English Education as the participants. Data were collected through an online questionnaire distributed to all of the participants and face-to-face interviews with five participants who were purposefully selected based on their responses to the questions in the online questionnaire. The results of the data analysis reveal that the students exhibited positive responses toward the utilization of QuillBot in academic writing. Furthermore, they also find QuillBot beneficial for three reasons; first, it helps improve the content or argument; second, it minimizes grammatical errors, and third, it enhances the language used in their manuscripts. It could be concluded that integrating artificial intelligence such as online paraphrasing tools helps EFL students overcome some difficulties encountered in writing academic papers, and consequently improve their writing products.This study implies that the use of AI-based technology in language classrooms would be advantageous in a variety of ways; however, further research is required to determine the relative importance of each element regarding students' use of the AI-based paraphrasing tool, particularly QuillBot.

 


Keywords


Academic writing; Artificial Intelligence; EFL students; Paraphrasing tool; QuillBot

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbar, M. T. (2020). Students’ paraphrasing skill in the literature review section of research proposal. Jambura Journal of English Teaching and Literature, 1(1), 1–15.

Al Fadda, H. (2012). Difficulties in academic writing: from the perspective of King Saud university postgraduate students. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 123-130. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n3p123

Al-Khasawneh, F., & Maher, S. (2010). Writing for Academic Purposes: Problems Faced by Arab Postgraduate Students of the College of Business, UUM. ESP World. 9, 1-23

Ansorge, L., Ansorgeová, K., & Sixsmith, M. (2021). Plagiarism through paraphrasing tools—the story of one plagiarized text. Publications, 9, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9040048

Ary, D., et. al. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education 8ed. Canada: Wadsworth.

Bailey, C., & Withers, J. (2018). What can screen capture reveal about students’ use of software tools when undertaking a paraphrasing task?. Journal of Academic Writing, 8(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v8i2.456

Chen, M. H. et al. (2013). Developing a corpus-based paraphrase tool to improve EFL learners' writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.783873

Chin, P., et. al. (2012). Academic writing skills 2: Teacher’s Manual. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2016). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Cortes-Vera, J., Garcia, T. J., & Gutierrez, A. (2017). Knowing and improving paraphrasing skills of Mexican college students. Information and Learning Science. 118 (9/10), 490-502. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-05-2017-0042

Dung, Trà Thi My. (2010). An Investigation in Paraphrasing Experienced by Vietnamese Students of English In Academic Writing. Ministry of Education and Training University of Da Nang.

Fithriani, R. (2018). Cultural influences on students’ perceptions of written feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1-13. Available at http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/FTL/article/view/3811

Fithriani, R. (2019). ZPD and the benefits of written feedback in L2 writing: Focusing on students’ perceptions. The Reading Matrix, 19(1), 63-73. Available at http://www.readingmatrix.com/files/20-c6t93b93.pdf

Fitria, T. N. (2021). QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing. Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities. 9 (1), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i1.10233

Fitria, T. N. (2022). Avoiding plagiarism of students’ scientific writing by using the QuillBot paraphraser. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 4(3), 252-262. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i3.9917

Ginting, R. S., & Fithriani, R. (2022). Peer and automated writing evaluation (AWE): Indonesian EFL college students’ preference for essay evaluation. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 25(2), 461-473. https://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT/article/view/4879

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied Thematic Analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436

Inayah, N., & Sulistyaningrum, S. D. (2021). Employing online paraphrasing tools to overcome students’ difficulties in paraphrasing. English Language Education Journal. 2(1).

Kirtland, et al. (2012). Free, Effective e-Tools for Teaching Writing. www.mitesol.org

Kurniati. E. Y., & Fithriani. R. (2022). Post-graduate students’ perceptions of Quillbot utilization in English academic writing class. JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 2503-1848. https://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852

Lodico, M., Spaulding, D. & Voegtle, K. (2010). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice, 2nd Edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Na, C. D., & Mai, N. X. N. C. (2017). Paraphrasing in academic writing: a case study of Vietnamese learners of English. Language Education in Asia, 8(1), 9-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/17/V8/I1/A02/Na_Mai

Prentice, F. M., & Kinden, C. E. (2018). Paraphrasing tools, language translation tools and plagiarism: an exploratory study. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0036-7

Rogerson, A. M., & McCarthy, G. (2017). Using internet based paraphrasing tools: original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-016-0013

Sulaiman, R., & Muhajir. (2019). The difficulties of writing scientific work at the English education students. Journal of English Education, 4(1), 54-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.31327/jee.v4i1.923

Sulistyaningrum, S. D. (2021). Utilizing online paraphrasing tools to overcome students’ paraphrasing difficulties in literature reviews. Journal of English Language Studies. 6(2).

Tsai, S. C. (2020). Chinese students’ perceptions of using Google Translate as a translingual CALL tool in EFL writing, Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799412.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v7i2.14882

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Mufida Syahnaz, Rahmah Fithriani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

scope isjd

Portal Garuda Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Web
Analytics
View My Stats

Flag Counter