Process Switching and Its Meaning towards Transgender Identity: An SFL Perspective

Marsandi Manar(1*), Sri Mulyati(2)

(1) University of Bina Sarana Informatika
(2) University of Bina Sarana Informatika
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This SFL study attempts to scrutinise the process-type switching and its underlying meanings in the cyber-based interactive responses towards an issue of transgender. The issue is confined to the suspected genital reconstruction surgery of an Indonesian celebrity that becomes viral and triggers public debate on social media. 254 Indonesian clauses of interactive comments addressing the issue of transgender identity on a YouTube video of more than 2 million views were analysed. Prompting and replying responses were investigated for their categorization of process types by employing the tables of analysis adapted from the experiential meaning framework of Halliday and Matthiessen (2004). The analysis reveals some occurrences of process type switching in the interactive responses among responders in addressing the Indonesian sensitive and viral issue of transgender identity. In responding to the prompting comments, responders tended to employ relational and material clauses to establish values, evidences, and impacts in objective ways while they also used mental and verbal processes to affect one another in subjective ways. This Hallidayan study hints that the process switching among responders in addressing the issue of transgender is associated with the strategies for maintaining and spreading their ideology by confirming, strengthening, adding, and even arguing.


Keywords


Process Switching, Transgender Identity, SFL

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahangar, A. A. (2014). A critical study of news discourse: Iran’s tenth presidential election of 2009 (1388) in Keyhan and Etemad newspapers. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(1), 151–169.

Al Fajri, M. S. (2018). The representation of a blasphemy protest in Jakarta in local and international press. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 705–713.

Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.). Transgenderism. In https://dictionary.cambridge.org/. Retrieved January 18, 2022, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/es-LA/dictionary/english/transgenderism.

Charles, M., Pecorari, D., & Hunston, S. (2009). Academic Writing at the Interface of Corpus and Discourse. Continuum.

Chen, L. (2005). Transitivity in media texts: negative verbal process sub-functions and narrator bias. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teachings, 43(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.33.

Choura, S. (2013). Ditransitive complementation in medical research articles. JéTou, 1(1), 53–58.

Díaz, I. A., Torres, J. M. T., Rodríguez, D. J. M. R., & Soto, M. N. C. (2019). Kids YouTubers generation: Analysis of YouTube channels of the new child phenomena. Pixel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educacion, 56(January 2020), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2019.i56.06.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics 2nd Edition (2nd ed.). Continuum International Publishing Group.

Feng, Y., Chen, H., & He, L. (2019). Consumer responses to femvertising: a data-mining case of dove’s “campaign for real beauty” on YouTube. Journal of Advertising, 48(3), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2019.1602858

Gerrot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Gerd Stabler.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Hodder Headline Group.

Herring, S. C. (2015). Computer-mediated discourse 2.0. In D. Tannem, D. Schiffrin, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.). (second). Blackwell.

Huang, P. (2009). A comparison of international and Chinese journal article abstracts from move structure to transitivity analysis. 4(1), 23–45.

Kazemian, B., Behnam, B., & Ghafoori, N. (2013). Ideational grammatical metaphor in scientific texts: A Hallidayan perspective. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(4), 146–168. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v5i4.4192.

Khan, M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: what motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024.

Kondowe, W. (2014). Residents and ideologies: a transitivity analysis of Binguwa Mutharika’s inaugural address. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.16.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Manar, M. (2016). Wars of media: the transitivity system of fraud-case headlines addressing an Indonesian media-owner politician. The 43rd International Systemic Functional Congress, 117–119.

Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Painter, C. (1997). Working with functional grammar. Arnold.

Martínez, I. A. (2001). Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity structure. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00013-2.

Matu, P. M. (2008). Transitivity as a tool for ideological analysis. Journal of Third World Studies, 25(1), 199–211.

Nemoto, T., Rebecca, D. G., Teh, Y. K., Iwamoto, M., & Trocki, K. (2018). Sociocultural context of sex work among Mak Nyah (transgender women) in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. In L. Nuttbrock (Ed.). Transgender sex work and society. Herrington Park Press.

Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The Content Analysis Guide Book. Sage Publication.

Nuttbrock, L. (2018). Transgender Sex Work and Society. Herrington Park Press.

Reath. (1998). The Language of Newspapers. Routledge.

Rendi. (2018, April 18). No Sensor: Video operasi ganti kelamin L L [Video file]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2Cyi-QuIXg.

Saifullah, A. R. (2019). Semiotik dan Kajian Wacana Interaktif di Internet. UPI Press.

Seo, S. (2013). Hallidayean transitivity analysis: the battle for Tripoli in the contrasting headlines of two national newspapers. Discourse and Society, 24(6), 774–791.

Shahab, S., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Ideational grammatical metaphor in pharmaceutical research articles. 3(4), 111–116.

Shokouhi, H., & Amin, F. (2010). A systemist ‘verb transitivity’ analysis of the Persian and English newspaper editorials: A focus of genre familiarity on EFL learner’s reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(4), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.4.387-396

Sucipto, A., Mahdi, A., & Sujatna, E. T. (2014). Process types in scientic English clauses : a Systemic Functional Linguistics analysis. 6(4), 389–395.

Walther, J. B., Deandrea, D., Kim, J., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research, 36(4), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01384.x.

Yaghoobi, M. (2009). A critical discourse analysis of the selected Iranian and American printed media on the representations of Hizbullah-Israel war. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 21. http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr21/yaghoobi.htm

Zheng, S., Yang, A., & Ge, G. (2014). Functional stylistic analysis: Transitivity in English-medium medical research articles. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n2p12..




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v7i1.13837

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Marsandi Manar, Sri Mulyati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

scope isjd

Portal Garuda Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Web
Analytics
View My Stats

Flag Counter