Analisis Scientific Reasoning Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Fluida Dinamis dengan Model STEM-PjBL

Sinthia Lolita Lorensia; Rif'ati Dina Handayani; Albertus Djoko Lesmono

doi:10.30998/sap.v9i1.22167

Analisis Scientific Reasoning Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Fluida Dinamis dengan Model STEM-PjBL

Sinthia Lolita Lorensia^(1*), Rif'ati Dina Handayani⁽²⁾, Albertus Djoko Lesmono⁽³⁾

(1)
(2) Pendidikan Fisika, Universitas Jember
(3) Pendidikan Fisika, Universitas Jember
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Scientific reasoning ability is an important aspect in learning so that students are able to apply the scientific method. In fact, research on students' scientific reasoning is still rare. STEM-PjBL is learning through projects to achieve certain results contextually by mastering several STEM concepts that are currently widely implemented. This research aims to analyze students' scientific reasoning ability in learning physics dynamic fluid material through the implementation of STEM-PJBL. This type of research is descriptive qualitative research with a case study approach carried out at SMAN 4 Jember in the odd semester of the 2023/2024 school year with a research population of one class XI. The subjects in this study amounted to 36 students who were divided into 6 groups. Scientific reasoning ability has six indicators that are measured during the learning process of dynamic fluid through STEM-PjBL. The results of this study indicate that the indicators that are categorized as very good are indicators of probabilistic reasoning and hypothesis-deductive reasoning. Indicators that are categorized as good include indicators of conservation reasoning, proportional reasoning, and correlation reasoning. The indicator that is categorized as very poor is the variable control indicator. This shows that students' scientific reasoning ability can be analyzed with the STEM-PjBL model. With STEM-PjBL, most students' scientific reasoning skills are good. However, it needs to be improved again, especially in the ability to control variables.

Keywords

Dynamic Fluid, Scientific Reasoning, STEM-PjBL

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References

W. Sumarni, N. Wijayati, dan S. Supanti, “Kemampuan Kognitif dan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Berpendekatan STEM,” J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kim., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 18–30, 2019, doi: 10.17977/um026v4i12019p018.

Nikmatin Mabsutsah dan Y. Yushardi, “Analisis Kebutuhan Guru terhadap E Module Berbasis STEAM dan Kurikulum Merdeka pada Materi Pemanasan Global,” J. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 205–213, 2022, doi: 10.37630/jpm.v12i2.588.

M. S. Ayuni, I. W. Distrik, and V. Viyanti, “The Effect of E-LKPD Assisted PJBL-STEM Learning Model on Scientific Reasoning Ability and Argumentation Performance of Class XII Science Students in Renewable Energy Materials,” Phys. Educ. Res. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 79–86, 2022, doi: 10.21580/perj.2022.4.2.12634.

K. Koenig, M. Schen, and L. Bao, “Explicitly Targeting Pre-service Teacher Scientific Reasoning Abilities and Understanding of Nature of Science through an Introductory Science Course Abstract,” Explic. Target. Pre-service Teach. Sci. Reason. Abil. Underst. Nat. Sci. through an Introd. Sci. Course, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2012.

V. Yossyana, R. W. Bachtiar, dan Maryani, “Profil Kemampuan Bernalar Siswa SMA Kelas XI di Kabupaten Jember pada Materi Usaha dan Energi,” vol. 3, pp. 247–252, 2018.

N. ’Aini, Subiki, dan B. Supriadi, “Identifikasi Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah (Scientific Reasoning) Siswa SMA di Kabupaten Jember Pada Pokok Bahasan Dinamika,” Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Fis. 2018, vol. 3, pp. 121–126, 2018.

F. Anjani, Supeno, dan Subiki, “Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Disertai Diagram Berpikir Multidimensi,” Lantanida J., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–95, 2020.

E. Rimadani, Parno, dan M. Diantoro, “Identifikasi Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor,” J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, dan Pengemb., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 833–839, 2017.

P. O. Wardani, Supeno, and Subiki, “Identifikasi Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMK tentang Rangkaian Listrik pada Pembelajaran Fisika,” Semin. Pendidik. Fis. 2018, vol. 3, pp. 183–188, 2018.

W. Antika, B. Sasomo, dan A. D. Rahmawati, “Analisis Asesmen Diagnostik pada Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning di Kurikulum Merdeka SMPN 3 Sine,” Pedagogy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 250–263, 2023.

Z. L. Utami, N. Bukit, M. P. Simanjuntak, dan Motlan, “Pengaruh Model Project Based Learning terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif pada Materi Fluida Dinamis di SMA,” J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 97–101, 2019.

C. E. Erlinawati, S. Bektiarso, dan Maryani, “Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Berbasis STEM pada Pembelajaran Fisika,” Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Fis. 2019, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/fkip-epro/article/view/15105

K. S. Handayanto and N. D. Putri, “The Effect of Project-Based Learning in STEM on Students’ Scientific Reasoning,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1835, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012006.

R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, and J. ames R. Morgan, STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=PS5KAAAAQBAJ

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA, 2016.

G. A. Handayani, S. Windyariani, dan R. Y. Pauzi, “Profil Tingkat Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas pada Materi Ekosistem,” Biodik, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 176–186, 2020, doi: 10.22437/bio.v6i2.9411.

D. T. Nagara, A. F. Musyaffa, and S. Kusairi, “Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMK Negeri 1 Singosari,” Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Fis. 2018, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 203–210, 2018.

L. Zahro, A. Juhanda, dan G. Nuranti, “Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Siswa SMP Kelas VII Berbasis Gender,” J. Pelita Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 134–137, 2020, doi: 10.24114/jpp.v8i2.17867.

A. U. Yana, S. K. Handayanto, dan T. Wuryanti, “Eksplorasi Kemampuan Scientific Reasoning Materi Hukum Newton Siswa SMA,” J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, dan Pengemb., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 503–509, 2021, doi: 10.17977/jptpp.v6i4.14694.

I. W. Yusa, W. P. Hadi, dan Suwandi, “Analisis Profil Scientific Reasoning Ability dan Korelasi terhadap Hasil Penilaian Akhir Semester Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran IPA,” J. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 12, no. September, pp. 682–689, 2022.

P. D. Sundari dan E. Rimadani, “Peningkatan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa melalui Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry Berstrategi Scaffolding pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor,” J. Eksakta Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 34–41, 2020, doi: 10.24036/jep/vol4-iss1/402.

J. A. Ross and E. Smith, “Thinking Skills for Gifted Students: The Case for Correlational Reasoning.,” Roeper Rev., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 239–243, 1995.

I. D. Andani, S. H. B. Prastowo, dan Supeno, “Identifikasi Kemampuan Penalaran Hipotesis-Deduktif Siswa SMA dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Materi Hukum Newton,” Semin. Nas. Quantum, vol. 25, pp. 562–568, 2018.

A. E. Lawson, “The Generality of Hypothetico-Deductive Reasoning: Making Scientific Thinking Explicit,” Am. Biol. Teach., vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 482–494, 2000, doi: 10.2307/4450956.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sap.v9i1.22167