Efektivitas Model Learning Cycle 5E dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa

Amjad Salong; Mohammad Amin Lasaiba

doi:10.30998/sap.v9i1.21994

Efektivitas Model Learning Cycle 5E dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa

Amjad Salong^(1*), Mohammad Amin Lasaiba⁽²⁾

(1)
(2) Pendidikan Geografi, Universitas Pattimura Ambon2
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Improving educational practices to enhance student learning outcomes has been a central theme in academic research. This study aims at exploring the effectiveness of the 5E Learning Cycle model in improving geography learning outcomes among students. The research method employed was Classroom Action Research conducted at Muhammadiyah Ambon High School from January to May 2022, with a sample of randomly selected 11th-grade classes. The study's findings indicated that the 5E Learning Cycle model effectively enhanced student learning outcomes and engagement. Between Cycle I and Cycle II, learning mastery from cognitive assessments improved. Specifically, there was a 72.5% increase in Cycle I, which improved to 85.0% in Cycle II. Performance assessments showed a 75.0% improvement in Cycle I and an 87.5% in Cycle II. This research demonstrated effectiveness and concluded after Cycle II regarding applying the learning model, the learning process involving teacher and student activities, and student learning outcomes assessed across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains.

Keywords

Implementation of Learning, 5E Learning Cycle Model, Learning Outcomes

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References

Y. U. R. Riti, I. N. S. Degeng, dan S. Sulton, “Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek dengan Menerapkan Metode Design Thinking untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Mata Pelajaran Kimia,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, vol. 6, no. 10, p. 1581, 2021, doi: 10.17977/jptpp.v6i10.15056.

S. Haryadi, E. T. Djatmika, dan P. Setyosari, “Suplemen Buku Ajar Tematik Materi Energi Alternatif & Sumber Daya Alam Berbasis,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, vol. Volume: 2, pp. 1330–1337, 2017, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i10.10067.

A. Chalkiadaki, “A Systematic Literature Review of 21st Century Skills and Competencies in Primary Education.,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–16, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1183407

A. Schleicher, “Educating Learners for Their Future, Not Our Past,” ECNU Rev. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 58–75, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.30926/ecnuroe20180101.

Y. Wang, J. Lavonen, and K. Tirri, “Aims for Learning 21st Century Competencies in National Primary Science Curricula in China and Finland,” Eurasia Journal Mathematics Science Technology Education., 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86363.

A. R. Falentina, M. Saptasari, dan S. E. Indriwati, “Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing di Kelas XI IPA,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, vol. 5, no. 10, p. 1397, 2021, doi: 10.17977/jptpp.v5i10.14100.

I. Hitipeuw and L. Rianghati, “The Influence of Video Based on Experiential Learning Toward The Socio-Emotion of The Children in Kindergarten,” International Journal Multidiscip. Thought, vol. 06, no. 01, pp. 2156–6992, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2976015

M. Hulaikah, I. N. S. Degeng, Sulton, and F. D. Murwani, “The Effect of Experiential Learning and Adversity Quotient on Problem Solving Ability,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 869–884, 2020, doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13156a.

A. Abaniel, “Enhanced Conceptual Understanding, 21st Century Skills and Learning Attitudes Through an Open Inquiry Learning Model in Physics,” Int. J. High. Educ. Manag., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 30–43, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/68453464

M. Ang, “Character and Service Dimensions of Global Competencies for 21st Century Learning: Cross-Sectional Perspectives,” Int. J. High. Educ. Manag., vol. 5, no. 1, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/68453464

R. S. Malik, “Educational Challenges in 21st Century and Sustainable Development,” J. Sustain. Dev. Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–20, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsder.v2i1.12266.

I. Yulaikah, S. Rahayu, dan P. Parlan, “Efektivitas Pembelajaran STEM dengan Model PjBL terhadap Kreativitas dan Pemahaman Konsep IPA Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, vol. 7, no. 6, p. 223, 2022, doi: 10.17977/jptpp.v7i6.15275.

D. W. Listyarini, A. R. As’ari, dan Furaidah, “Pengaruh Model Teams Games Tournament Berbantuan Permainan Halma terhadap Minat dan Hasil Belajar pada Materi Bunyi Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 538–543, 2018, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i5.10930.

P. Q. Utami, S. Sumari, dan I. W. Dasna, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry terhadap Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 122, 2022, doi: 10.17977/jptpp.v7i4.15217.

I. P. Widyanto dan R. Vienlentia, “Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Melalui Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning,” J. Didakt. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 637–656, 2021, doi: 10.26811/didaktika.v5i3.201.

I. D. Lestari, L. Yuliati, dan H. Suwono, “Kemampuan Representasi Siswa SMP dalam The 5E Learning Cycle dengan Reflective Self Assessment pada Materi Kalor,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian dan Pengembangan, pp. 165–173, 2018, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i2.10492.

M. Nursafitri, A. Santoso, dan S. Sumari, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E dengan Analogi terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Siswa pada Materi Laju Reaksi,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, vol. 6, no. 7, p. 1076, 2021, doi: 10.17977/jptpp.v6i7.14928.

V. B. Cylindrica, I. W. Dasna, dan S. Sumari, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E Berbantuan E-Scaffolding pada Materi Laju Reaksi terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Siswa dengan Motivasi Berprestasi Berbeda,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, vol. 6, no. 7, p. 1115, 2021, doi: 10.17977/jptpp.v6i7.14934.

Rahmawati, S. K. Handayanto, and I. W. Dasna, “Pengaruh Learning Cycle 5E Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Peserta Didik Kelas VIII,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 286–290, 2018, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i3.10624.

E. Yulianingtyas, E. Budiasih, dan S. Marfuah, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Jurnal Belajar dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 6E terhadap Kesadaran Metakognitif Siswa Sman 8 Malang pada Materi Redoks,” Teori Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 724–730, 2017, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i5.9203.

R. Marisna dan D. Sigit, “Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Antara Siswa yang Dibelajarkan dengan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5e dan Learning Cycle 5e-Mind Mapping pada Materi …,” J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, dan …, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 891–897, 2018, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i7.11332.

D. S. Wulansari and Z. Adriyani, “The Effect of the 5E Learning Cycle Model on Student Learning Outcomes in Islamic Elementary School,” Scaffolding J. Pendidik. Islam dan Multikulturalisme, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 506–525, 2023, doi: 10.37680/scaffolding.v5i2.3033.

N. M. A. Wiriani and I. M. Ardana, “The Impact of the 5E Learning Cycle Model Based on the STEM Approach on Scientific Attitudes and Science Learning Outcomes,” Mimb. PGSD Undiksha, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 300–307, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jjpgsd.v10i2.48515.

Y. M. Ardi, V. Vauzia, A. Razak, and S. Syamsurizal, “The Effect of Using the Student Academic Ability- Problem Solving and 5E Cycle Learning Models on the Student Learning Outcomes,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 607–611, 2021, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v7i4.777.

M. Syaripudin, D. D. Paramata, and D. G. E. Setiawan, “The Influence of the Learning Cycle 5e Teaching Model Assisted by PhET Media on Students’ Learning Outcomes in the Subject of Elasticity and Hooke’s Law,” Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jpft.v9i1.4405.

D. Elfrida and R. Selly, “Differences of Students’ Chemistry Learning Outcomes Based on the 5e Learning Cycle Model,” J. Pena Sains, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 48–56, 2023, doi: 10.21107/jps.v10i2.19275.

S. A. N. T. Ilmi, D. Ismunandar, R. Runisah, and A. M. Akbar, “Using the Learning Cycle 5e Model to Improve Student Activity and Outcomes in Relationship and Function Materials at SMA Negeri 1 Indramayu Class X Mipa 8,” Int. J. Sci. Educ. Cult. Stud., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 89–100, 2023, doi: 10.58291/ijsecs.v2i2.129.

A. Purwanto, “Implementasi Model Learning Cycle ‘5e’ Disertai LKS untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas, Keterampilan Proses Sains, dan Hasil Belajar Biologi,” BIOEDUKASI (Jurnal Pendidik. Biol., vol. 5, no. 1, 2014, doi: 10.24127/bioedukasi.v5i1.259.

M. Tanor, A. Arrijani, and D. Rayer, “Application of Cycle 5E Learning Model in Photosynthesis Discussion to improve Skills of Science Processes Airmadidi State High School Students,” Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar, MSCEIS 2019, 12 October 2019, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia. EAI, 2020. doi: 10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296574.

D. A. Santi, “The Improvement of Science Process Skills Theme 2, Subthemes 2 in Meeting 1 Through the Learning Cycle (5E) Model on the Students Grades IV-A at MI Al-Ahmad Krian Sidoarjo,” Indones. J. Sci. Learn., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 57–62, 2020, doi: 10.15642/ijsl.v1i2.957.

A. W. Lorsbach, “The Learning Cycle as a Tool for Planning Science Instruction,” Tersedia(http//www. coe. ilstu. edu/scienceed/lorsbach/257lrcy. html).[12 Juni 2013], 2002, doi: https://msad54.org/sites/default/files/Learning-Cycle.pdf.

Partini, Budijanto, dan S. Bachri, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran Siswa,” J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, dan Pengemb., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 268–272, 2017, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v2i2.8541.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sap.v9i1.21994