Digital learning is an activity that involves the development of the digital world in an effort to improve literacy, development of thinking skills and the skills. Digital learning is in the form of digital-based reference materials for students to support learning activities. The purpose of this study was to examine one of the digital learning resources in the form of Chat GPT as a student learning resource. The research design uses a literature review of both articles and proceedings, published on googlescholar from 2019-2022. The results of the study found the use of GPT chat in the implementation of learning as a learning reference source for fulfilling students' cognitive tasks. In addition, various studies of the impact of using GPT Chat in learning were also found, both for positive contributions and for negative impact contributions. Chat GPT provides benefits in managing learning, especially alternatives to increasing student activeness.

D. Yan, “Impact of ChatGPT on Learners in a L2 Writing Practicum: An Exploratory Investigation,” Educ. Inf. Technol., no. 0123456789, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4.

T. Susnjak, “ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?,” pp. 1–21, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09292.

J. Qadir, “Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education,” TechRxiv, 2022.

S. S. Biswas, “Potential Use of Chat GPT in Global Warming,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03171-8.

M. Farrokhnia, S. K. Banihashem, O. Noroozi, and A. Wals, “A SWOT Analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for Educational Practice and Research,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846.

S. S. Biswas, “Role of Chat GPT in Public Health,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03172-7.

V. W. Xue, P. Lei, and W. C. Cho, “The Potential Impact of ChatGPT in Clinical and Translational Medicine,” Clin. Transl. Med., vol. 13, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1216.

Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “‘So what if ChatGPT wrote it?’ Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities, Challenges and Implications of Generative Conversational AI for Research, Practice and Policy,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 71, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.

C. A. Gao et al., “Comparing Scientific Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT to Original Abstracts Using an Artificial Intelligence Output Detector, Plagiarism Detector, and Blinded Human Reviewers,” bioRxiv, 2022.

J. Wang et al., “On the Robustness of ChatGPT: an Adversarial and Out-of-Distribution Perspective,” pp. 1–20, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12095.

X. Zhai, “ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education,” SSRN Electron. J., 2023, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4312418.

Ö. Ayd?n and E. Karaarslan, “OpenAI ChatGPT Generated Literature Review: Digital Twin in Healthcare,” SSRN Electron. J., 2022, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4308687.

E. Kasneci et al., “ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 103, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.

D. Sobania, M. Briesch, C. Hanna, and J. Petke, “An Analysis of the Automatic Bug Fixing Performance of ChatGPT,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2301.08653., 2023, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.08653.

W. Yeadon, O.-O. Inyang, A. Mizouri, A. Peach, and C. Testrow, “The Death of the Short-Form Physics Essay in the Coming AI Revolution,” Phys. Educ., vol. 58, no. 3, p. 035027, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1361-6552/acc5cf.

B. L. Frye, “Should Using an AI Text Generator to Produce Academic Writing Be Plagiarism?,” Fordham Intellect. Prop. Media Entertain. …, vol. 23529, no. 2, 2022.