Profil Kompetensi Science Technology Engginering Mathematic with Pedagogical Content Knowledge Guru Gen Z dan Milenial di Kalimantan Barat

Egy Abdi(1*), Anwar Deli(2), Afandi Afandi(3), Indri Astuti(4)

(1) Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat
(2) 
(3) 
(4) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aimed to identify STEM PCK competence and barometer for gen z and millennial teachers in West Kalimantan as the authority successor subject in the future education with an evaluation stage which was expected as a further step taken so that progression scale realized and had implications for education advancement, especially in West Kalimantan. Respondents involved in this study amounted to 41 teachers aged 23 to 30 years spread over 14 districts/cities in West Kalimantan applying probability sampling technique. The instrument used is STEM PCK questionnaire adopted from Yildirim and Sahin (2019) which consists of 56 statements consisting of 12 statements related to pedagogy, 14 statements of 21st century skills knowledge, and 30 other questions related to STEM PCK knowledge, the data obtained through the use of a Likert rating scale, then each respondent will be classified into 3 levels, namely high, medium and low using the interpretation of the average score on the Likert scale. The result showed that in general there are 5 respondents or 12.2% who are in the high category and 36 other respondents or 87.8% are in the low category, and there are no respondents who are in the low category, it can be interpreted that although there is no respondents who had low STEM PCK competence, however, there are many millennial teachers in West Kalimantan on a medium scale who are needed to be able to implement every aspect of STEM PCK in learning optimally so that dynamic educational standards are realized with global demands in the modern era.

Keywords


STEM, PCK, Millenial Teacher, STEM PCK Competence, 21st Century Learning

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


S. N. A. Halim and S. N. A. Halim, “Employer’s role performance towards employees’ satisfaction: A study of SME Industry 4.0 in Malaysia,” … Oppor. SMEs Ind. 4.0, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/employers-role-performance-towards-employees-satisfaction/251931

K. C. Margot and T. Kettler, “Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 2, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2.

J. Hattie, “Teachers Make a Difference, What is the research evidence?” research.acer.edu.au, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=research_conference_2003

M. K. Topcu, “Competency framework for the fourth industrial revolution,” Res. Anthol. Cross-Industry Challenges …, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/competency-framework-for-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/276827

O. G. Board, “PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework (first draft).” mokykla2030.lt, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.mokykla2030.lt/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/GB-2018-4-PISA-2021-Mathematics-Framework-First-Draft.pdf

L. D. English, “STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1.

B. Yildirim and E. Sahin Topalcengiz, “STEM Pedagogical Content Knowledge Scale (STEMPCK): A Validity and Reliability Study,” J. STEM Teach. Educ., 2019, doi: 10.30707/jste53.2yildirim.

A. Dariyo, “Dasar-Dasar Pedagogi Modern [Basics of Modern Pedagogy],” Jakarta: Indeks. 2013.

L. S. Shulman, “Foundations of the new reform,” Educ. Res., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 1987, [Online]. Available: https://meridian.allenpress.com/her/article-abstract/57/1/1/31319

J. Loughran, Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching & learning about teaching. taylorfrancis.com, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203019672/developing-pedagogy-teacher-education-john-loughran

J. Williams and J. Lockley, “Using CoRes to develop the pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of early career science and technology teachers,” J. Technol. Educ., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 34–53, 2012, doi: 10.21061/jte.v24i1.a.3.

M. Cochran-Smith, “The outcomes question in teacher education,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 527–546, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00012-9.

J. Loughran, “Professional learning: Creating conditions for developing knowledge of teaching,” Teach. Learn. That Matters Int. Perspect., pp. 47–63, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203805879-11/professional-learning-creating-conditions-developing-knowledge-teaching-john-loughran

K. Beswick and S. Fraser, “Developing mathematics teachers’ 21st century competence for teaching in STEM contexts,” ZDM - Mathematics Education, vol. 51, no. 6. pp. 955–965, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s11858-019-01084-2.

T. Sarkim, “Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Basic to Reform Secondary Physics Teacher Education in Indonesia,” University of Melbourne. University of Melbourne, Department …, 2005.

F. Rokhman, M. Hum, A. Syaifudin, and Yuliati, “Character Education for Golden Generation 2045 (National Character Building for Indonesian Golden Years),” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 141, pp. 1161–1165, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.197.

K. Gardner, D. Glassmeyer, and R. Worthy, “Impacts of STEM Professional Development on Teachers’ Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, and Practice,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 4. frontiersin.org, 2019. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00026.

M. Sedlak, “Culture and Pedagogy: International Comparisons in Primary Education,” Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 467–469, 2003, doi: 10.1076/sesi.14.4.467.17151.

B. Y?ld?r?m, “An Analyses and Meta-Synthesis of Research on STEM Education,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 7, no. 34, pp. 23–33, 2016.

L. Guo, “Preparing Teachers to Educate for the 21st Century Global Citizenship: Envisioning and Enacting,” J. Glob. Citizsh. Equity Educ., vol. Volume 4 N, no. April, pp. 1–23, 2016.

S. Drake and J. Reid, “Integrated Curriculum as an Effective Way to Teach 21st Century Capabilities,” Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, vol. 1, no. 1. researchgate.net, pp. 31–50, 2018. doi: 10.30777/apjer.2018.1.1.03.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sap.v6i3.11555

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Egy Abdi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 

SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan) indexed by:




Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.


View My Statis


Flag Counter