Implementasi Model CRI dengan Strategi Tugas dan Paksa untuk Mengurangi Miskonsepsi Matematika

Ichwan Maulana; Leonard Leonard

doi:10.30998/sap.v7i1.11349

Implementasi Model CRI dengan Strategi Tugas dan Paksa untuk Mengurangi Miskonsepsi Matematika

Ichwan Maulana⁽¹⁾, Leonard Leonard^(2*)

(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(2) Scopus ID: 57208621685 - Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the decrease in students' mathematical misunderstandings through the CRI learning model with a constructivism approach modified with task and forced learning strategies in students of SMP PGRI Jatiuwung and SMP Muhammadyah 5. The research method used was an experimental method, with a Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design research design. The population in this study was all students of SMP PGRI Jatiuwung and SMP Muhammadyah 5, while the affordable population was students of SMP PGRI Jatiuwung and SMP Muhammadyah 5 years in 2021/2022. The sample in this study was 60 eighth graders. Before the analysis, the first data were tested for normality using the Lilliefors test and tested for homogeneity using the Fisher test. Based on hypothesis testing, thitung = -0.893 and ttabel = 2.002 at a significance level of 5% with a degree of freedom (dk = 58) which means (-0.883) < (2.002). It can be concluded that the decline in student misunderstandings in the experimental group is better than in the control group. This suggests that CRI learning models with a constructivism approach modified with task and forced learning strategies can reduce students' mathematical misunderstandings.

Keywords

constructivism approach, task and forced learning strategies, CRI learning model, misconceptions

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References

C. S. Widodo, Panduan Menyusun Bahan Ajar Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo, 2008.

O. E. Ajisafe, K. O. Bolarinwa, and E. Tuke, “Issues in business education programme: Challenges to national transformation.,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 6, no. 21, pp. 208–213, 2015.

L. Novitasari dan L. Leonard, “Pengaruh kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematika terhadap hasil belajar matematika,” Pros. Disk. Panel Nas. Pendidik. Mat., pp. 758–766, 2017.

A. Suharyanto, “Peranan pendidikan kewarganegaraan dalam membina sikap toleransi antar siswa,” JPPUMA J. Ilmu Pemerintah. dan Sos. Polit. UMA, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 192–203, 2013.

Sadirman A.M, “Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar”. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.

S. Sagala, “Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran”. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2010.

E. N. Kresma, “Perbandingan pembelajaran konvensional dan pembelajaran berbasis masalah terhadap titik jenuh siswa maupun hasil belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika,” Educ. Vitae, vol. 1, no. 1, 2014.

F. Korur, “Exploring seventh-grade students’ and pre-service science teachers’ misconceptions in astronomical concepts,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1041–1060, 2015, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1373a.

R. L. Bell and K. C. Trundle, “The use of a computer simulation to promote scientific conceptions of moon phases,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 346–372, 2008, doi: 10.1002/tea.20227.

B. L. Chua and E. Wood, “Working with logarithms: Students’ misconceptions and errors,” Math. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 53–70, 2005.

E. P. Wardani, M. Mardiyana, dan S. Subanti, “Analisis miskonsepsi siswa pada materi pokok lingkaran ditinjau dari kesiapan belajar dan gaya berpikir siswa kelas XI IPA SMA N 3 Surakarta tahun ajaran 2013/2014,” J. Pembelajaran Mat., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 328–340, 2016.

A. Grigorovitch, “Children’s misconceptions and conceptual change in Physics Education: the concept of light,” J. Adv. Nat. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 2014.

J. Muzangwa and P. Chifamba, “Analysis of Errors and Misconceptions in the Learning of Calculus by Undergraduate Students.,” Acta Didact. Napocensia, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2012.

N. Juanengsih, et al., “Analysis of student’s misconceptions on basic concepts of natural science through cri (certainly of response index), clinical interview and concept maps,” Proceeding Int. Conf. Res. Implement. Educ. Math. Sci. 2014, no. May, pp. 18–20, 2014.

R. P. Khotimah, “Student Misconceptions in Solving Real Analysis Problem Based on Reasoning Framework Misconception is a mistaken idea from a misunderstanding of something. There have been several studies about reasoning and student misconception in mathematics problems,” Int. Conf. Math. Educ. Theory, Appl., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 70–75, 2017.

H. Türkmen and E. Usta, “The role of learning cycle approach overcoming misconceptions in science,” Ekim Kastamonu Educ. J., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 491–500, 2007.

V.-L. Holmes, C. Miedema, L. Nieuwkoop, and N. Haugen, “Data-driven intervention: correcting mathematics students’ misconceptions, not mistakes,” Math. Educ., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 24–44, 2013.

D. Hammer, “More than misconceptions Multiple perspectives on student knowledge,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1316–1325, 1996.

D. González-Gómez, D. Airado-Rodríguez, M. A. D. Acedo, and L. V. M. Niño, “Change in elementary school students’ misconceptions on material systems after a theoretical-practical instruction,” Int. Electron. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 499–510, 2017.

D. Kaltakçi and N. Didiç, “Identification of pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions on gravity concept: A study with a 3-tier misconception test,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 899, pp. 499–500, 2007, doi: 10.1063/1.2733255.

S. Hasan, D. Bagayoko, and E. L. Kelley, “Misconceptions and the certainty of response index (CRI),” Phys. Educ., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 294–299, 1999.

O. Da?delen and ?. Kösterelio?lu, “Effect of conceptual change texts for overcoming misconceptions in ‘people and management’ unit,” Int. Electron. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 567–580, 2015.

B. T. Ta?dan and M. Y. Koyunkaya, “Examination of pre-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge of teaching function concept,” Acta Didact. Napocensia, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 17–19, 2017.

K. H and J. Mahfud, “Konsep Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan dan Implementasinya.” MDC Jateng dengan Pilar Media, Jogjakarta, p. 198, 2007.

A. Rahman, “Urgensi Pedagogik dalam Pembelajaran dan Implikasinya dalam Pendidikan,” Belajea J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 83–102, 2018, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/bjpi.v3i1.358.

Leonard, “Task and forced instructional strategy : instructional strategy based on character and culture of indonesia nation,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2018, doi: dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v8i1.2408.

S. Budyartati, “Tes Kognitif Diagnostik untuk Mendeteksi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” E-journal IKIP PGRI Madiun, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40–50, 2011.

I. K. Sudarsana, “Optimalisasi Penggunaan Teknologi dalam Implementasi Kurikulum di Sekolah (Persepektif Teori Konstruktivisme),” Cetta J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 2018.

F. Azizah dan S. Sukaesih, “Kefektifan pembelajaran materi ekosistem menggunakan heuristik vee dengan sq3r,” Unnes J. Biol. Educ., vol. 3, no. 13, pp. 283–290, 2014.

W. Widodo, W. Murtini, dan T. Susilowati, “Penerapan metode pemberian tugas dan resitasi dalam upaya meningkatkan kemampuan menulis surat siswa kelas X d administrasi perkantoran SMK Wikarya Karanganyar tahun ajaran 2014/2015,” J. Inf. Dan Komun. Adm. Perkantoran, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 131–145, 2016.

L. S. Hadianti, “Pengaruh pelaksanaan tata tertib sekolah terhadap kedisiplinan belajar siswa (Penelitian Deskriftif Analisis di SDN Sukakarya II Kecamatan samarang Kabupaten Garut),” J. Pendidik. Univ. Garut, vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 1–8, 2008.

B. Sumantri, “Pengaruh Disiplin Belajar terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI SMK PGRI 4 Ngawi Tahun Pelajaran 2009/2010,” J. Media Prestasi, vol. VI, no. 3, pp. 117–131, 2010.

G. Hamdu dan L. Agustina, “Pengaruh motivasi belajar siswa terhadap pestasi belajar IPA di sekolah dasar,” J. Penelit. Pendidik., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 2011.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sap.v7i1.11349