RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL OF EDUCATION
EXPLORING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION AND PREFERENCE IN READING DIGITAL AND PRINTED TEXTS
(1) Universitas Islam Cordoba
(2) Universitas Islam Malang
(3) Universitas Islam Malang
(4) Universitas Islam Cordoba
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The rapid shift to digital learning media has sparked debate over which medium students prefer and understand better for reading. Digital texts provide easier access and convenience; however, studies increasingly indicate cognitive costs associated with such Reading for deeper processing. This study explores university students’ attitudes and preferences toward digital versus print Reading, with a particular focus on the attitudes and life experiences associated with each format. Using a mixed-methods design, questionnaire data were gathered from 62 ELLs and supported by semi-structured interviews with several participants. The results support a clear preference for printed text, especially when reading for prolonged periods and annotating. Surveyed students are not alone in reporting that concentration, comprehension, and memory retention all improve when reading from printed rather than digital materials because of extraneous cognitive load; dual-processing theories suggest that more extraneous mental effort may be required in a written rather than a digital environment. However, the research suggests that students find digital texts convenient for Reading preparation and for flexible contributions to seminar discussion. Differences among these perceptions highlight the interaction among cognitive, affective, and situational factors that influence Reading preferences. The research concludes that the two formats have complementary roles; however, hard copy remains preferred for extended academic Reading. Pedagogical implications: Students can benefit from format-specific Reading approaches in order to maximize their gains.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive Regulation of Text Learning: On Screen Versus on Paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022086
Alamri, B. (2019). Reading Preferences of ESL Students: Electronic Texts vs. Printed. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(4).
Al-Seghayer, K., & AImam Mohammad, A. (2024). Comparative efficacy of digital and nondigital texts on reading comprehension and EFL learners’ perceptions of their merits. In Language Learning & Technology (Vol. 2024, Issue 1). https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73589
Amirtharaj, A. D., Raghavan, D., & Arulappan, J. (2023). Preferences for printed books versus E−books among university students in a Middle Eastern country. Heliyon, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16776
Banaz, E. (2025). Cognitive bridges from digital reading to writing: Investigating the mediating role of reading disposition. Acta Psychologica, 260, 105530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105530
Barsalou, L. (2008). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
Clark, J., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual Coding Theory and Education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076
Daruhadi, G. (2024). Phenomenological Method as A Theoretical Basis of Qualitative Methods. International Journal of Social Health, 3(9), 599–613. https://doi.org/10.58860/ijsh.v3i9.238
Delgado, P., & Salmerón, L. (2021). The inattentive on-screen reading: Reading medium affects attention and reading comprehension under time pressure. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101396
Divya, P., & Haneefa, M. K. (2020). Students’ preference of reading print and digital resources: A study in universities in Kerala, India. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2020, 1-23.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The Theory of Affordances. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Ishii, K., Lyons, M., & Carr, S. (2019). Revisiting media richness theory for today and future. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.138
Ivić, I. (2019). Printed and digital media: Printed and digital textbooks. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 9(3), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.694
Johnston, N., & Salaz, A. M. (2019). Exploring the Reasons Why University Students Prefer Print over Digital Texts: An Australian Perspective. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 68(2), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2019.1587858
Li, L.-Y., Chen, G.-D., & Yang, S.-J. (2013). Construction of cognitive maps to improve e-book reading and navigation. Computers & Education, 60, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.010
Liu, W., Huang, H., Saleem, A., & Zhao, Z. (2022). The effects of university students’ fragmented reading on cognitive development in the new media age: evidence from Chinese higher education. PeerJ, 10, e13861. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13861
Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510632040
Manalu, B. H. (2019). Students Perception of Digital Texts Reading: A Case Study at the English Education Department of Universitas Kristen Indonesi. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 5(3), 191. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v5i3.1312
Mangen, A., & Van der Weel, A. (2017). Why don’t we read hypertext novels?. Convergence, 23(2), 166-181.
Merchant, G. (2021). Reading with technology: the new normal. Education 3-13, 49(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1824705
Ross, B., Pechenkina, E., Aeschliman, C., & Chase, A. M. (2017). Print versus digital texts: understanding the experimental research and challenging the dichotomies.
Seok, S., & DaCosta, B. (2016). Perceptions and preferences of digital and printed text and their role in predicting digital literacy. Asian Social Science, 12(5), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v12n5p14
Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading Across Mediums: Effects of Reading Digital and Print Texts on Comprehension and Calibration. Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37-76). Academic Press.
Syaputri, K. D. (2017). A Survey of Readers’ Reading Preference: Digital or Printed Reading Text.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v11i2.17152
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.