RAMU FILSAFAT DALAM TEKNOLOGI, EKOLOGI DAN KOGNISI
(1) Vienna University
(2) Gadjah Mada University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Abstract: The understanding of philosophy in Indonesia is like an outdated word which only dates to the grave. This paper is supposed to be not as a hardly philosophical defense, but rather a balancing effort against a developing understanding, by describing attempts that philosophy do in regard to overcome the theoretical realm to the practical. The discussions are about technology especially Artificial Intelligence and environment through ecology. The discussion was closed through a reflection on the picture of philosophy in Indonesia. The used method is philosophical reflection supported by literature study. The results are: 1) philosophy in technology, especially AI plays a role not only in the study of ethical issues, but also in forming intelligence that AI can contain 2) philosophy in ecology filling a gap in the form of holistic awareness as an antithesis of ecology by science that focuses on mechanistic and causality 3) Indonesia through its philosophy must find and voice its features towards the developing era. Indonesia has a great opportunity to develop its own philosophical systems and theories based on its characteristics.
Keywords: philosophy, technology, ecology, cognition, identity
Abstrak: Pemahaman filsafat di Indonesia selayaknya kata usang yang tinggal tunggu tanggal untuk menuju kuburan. Tulisan ini bukanlah uraian defensif pembelaan filsafat secara mati-matian, melainkan sebuah usaha penyeimbang terhadap pemahaman yang berkembang, melalui pemaparan sejumlah usaha filsafat dalam mengatasi ranah teoritis menuju praktis. Hal yang dikaji berupa teknologi khususnya kecerdasan buatan oleh filsafat teknologi dan lingkungan dalam kacamata ekologi. Pembahasan ditutup melalui refleksi gambaran filsafat di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah refleksi filosofis ditunjang dengan studi pustaka. Hasil refleksi berupa: 1) filsafat dalam teknologi khususnya AI memainkan peran bukan hanya dalam mengkaji dampak etis melainkan juga membentuk form kecerdasan yang dapat dimuat AI 2) filsafat dalam ekologi berperan mengisi celah berupa kesadaran holistik sebagai antitesis dari ekologi ala sains yang condong menitikberatkan kasualitas dan mekanistik 3) Indonesia melalui filsafatnya harus menemukan serta menyuarakan coraknya terhadap era yang berkembang. Indonesia memiliki peluang besar untuk mengembangkan sistem dan teori filsafatnya sendiri berdasarkan ciri khas yang dimiliki.
Kata Kunci: filsafat, teknologi, ekologi, kognisi, jati diri
References
Adiwibowo(ed), S. (2007). Ekologi Manusia. Bogor: Fakultas Ekologi Manusia - IPB.
Arendt, H. (2018). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chichago Press.
Capra, F. (1995). Deep Ecology; A New Paradigm. In G. Sessions(ed), Deep ecology for the twenty- first century. Massachusetts: Shambhala Publications.
Christensen, C. B. (2014). Society for Human Ecology. Human Ecology Review, Vol. 20, 31-49.
Coeckelbergh, M., 2019. Introduction to Philosophy of Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coeckelbergh, M. 2020. AI Ethics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gallagher, S. 2008. Direct Perception in The Intersubjective Context. OUW Library. https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers. Diakses tanggal 27 Juli 2020.
Justin, H. (2020). Artificial Intelligence. Thirroul: The Spinney Press.
Gallagher, S. (2020). Action and Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. (1991). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Loh, J. (2019). Robot and Ethics in Digital Age. In: Proceedings of the 2019 The Conference of Machine Learning Innovation, Berlin.
Marzuqi, A. M. (2020). Mistik Pembebasan; Dunia Butuh Sembuh dan Manusia Perlu Waras. Yogyakarta: Lintas Nalar.
Migotti, M., Wyatt, N. (2017). On the Very Idea of Sex with Robots. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Naess, A. (1986). The Deep Ecology Movement; Some Philosophical Aspects. Philosophical Inquiry, 10-31.
Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, Community and Lifestyle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Naess, A. (2008). Ecology of Wisdom. (A. Drengson, & B. Deval, Eds.) Berkeley: Counterpoint.
Rowlands, M. (2010). The New Science of The Mind. From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Schummer, J. (2001): Aristotle on technology and nature, Philosophia Naturalis 38: 105-120.
Searle, John. R. (1980) Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3): 417-457.
Vickers, B. (2008). Francis Bacon, Feminist Historiography, and the Dominion of Nature. Journal of the History of Ideas: 117-141.
Wallach, W., Allen, C. (2009). Moral Machines Teaching Robot Right from Wrong. New York: Oxford University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/fjik.v8i3.8656
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Diah Febri Utami, Abdillah Muhammad Marzuqi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
| Publisher: Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Address: Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. |
|
 Faktor : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |