Desain Diskusi Matematika yang Menguntungkan bagi Siswa
(1) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
D’Ambrosio, B., Johnson, H. & Hobbs, L. (1995). Strategies for Increasing Achievement in Mathematics. In R.W. Cole (Ed.), Educating Everybody’s Children: Diverse Teaching Strategies for Diverse Learners. 121 – 138.
Goos, M. (1995). How Do You Know When You Understand? Using an Explanation to Monitor and Construct Mathematical Understanding. Paper Presented at The Postgraduate Research Conference Commemorating 50 Years of Educational Studies at The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Hujono, H. (2001). Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Malang: JICA Universitas Negeri Malang.
Lee, C. (2006). Language for Learning Mathematics: Assessment for Learning in Practice. New York: Open University Press.
Mcnair, R. E. (2000). Working In The Mathematics Frame: Maximizing The Potential to Learn From Students’ Mathematics Classroom Discussions. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 42: 197-209.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
Norris, S.P., & Phillips, L.M. (2003). How Literacy in Its Fundamental Sense is Central to Scientific Literacy. Science Education. 87: 224–240.
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 draft Mahematics Framework. (https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Mathematics%20Framework%20.pdf). Diakses pada 10 Januari 2017.
Oldfield, B. J. (1991). Games to Stimulate Mathematics Discussion. Journal Them Mathematical Association. 7-9.
Pirie, S. E. B. & Schwarzenberger, L. E. (1988). Mathematical Discussion and Mathematical Understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 19: 459–470.
Leonor, S. & Semana, S. (2015). Developing Mathematics Written Communication Through Expository Writing Supported by Assessment Strategies. Journal of Education Studies Mathematics. 88: 65-87.
Shouse, R. (2001). The Impact of Traditional and Reform-Style Practices on Students Mathematical Achievement. In T. Loveless (Ed.), The Great Curriculum Debate: How Should We Teach Reading and Math?. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Skemp, R. R. (1971). Psychologi of Learning Mathematics. Australia: The Chaucer Press.
Smith, M. S. & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Mathematics Discussions. United States of America: National Council of Mathematics.
Yore, L.D., Bisanz, G.L. & Hand, B.M. (2003). Examining The Literacy Component of Science Literacy: 25 Years of Language Arts and Science Research. International Journal of Science Education. 25: 689–725.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v3i1.1094
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Anwar Rifa'i
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Alamat: Jln. Nangka No. 58C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530