Students’ Perception of Teachers’ Creativity in Implementing Home Learning at SMK Duta Mas
(1) 
(2) Indraprasta PGRI University
(3) 
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The Indonesian government formally enforces rules of study, worship, and work from home from March 16th, 2020. Minimizing and limiting meetings involving physical contact are efforts to reduce the spread of the COVID-19 virus. These conditions have implications for the effectiveness of the learning process in schools. The implementation of a home learning program replacing face to face-to-face schooling raised some problems from the lack of teachers’ skills to hazy educational policies. Because of that reason this study is conducted to find out students’ perception of teachers’ creativity in implementing home learning programs during the pandemic. There were 60 participants chosen by simple random sampling from grade 11th, the academic year 2019-2020, SMK Duta Mas. A questionnaire with a Likert scale was used to collect data. Then data analysis employed qualitative descriptive research to analyse indicators of teachers’ creativity proposed by Slameto. The findings of this study reveal that from 6 indicators of teachers’ creativity, 5 of them have a high percentage and the average total percentage is 79.26%. Therefore, it can be concluded that students’ perception of teachers’ creativity in SMK Duta Mas in implementing home learning during the pandemic is considered high. However, teachers need to improve their ability in creating media for learning because it is very important to improve students’ learning achievement and to motivate them to learn.
Keywords
References
Agung, I. (2010). Meningkatkan Kreatifitas Pembelajaran bagi Guru. Jakarta: Bestari Buana Murni.
Ahmadi, Niluphar, & Besançon, M. (2017). Creativity as a stepping stone towards developing other competencies in classrooms. Education Research International, Volume 2017, Article ID 1357456, 9 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1357456
Akmal, S., Dhivah, I., & Mulia. (2020). Investigating students’ interest on reading journal articles: materials, reasons and strategies. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 194-208.
Albert. (2010). Assessing English Language Teacher’s Creativity Quotient. Retrieved from http://www.google.co.id/search?ei=78qMWqveIMqY8gWcwIu4Ag&qAssessing+En glish+Language+Teacher
Amri, S., & Ahmadi, I. (2010). Proses Pembelajaran Inovatif dan Kreatif dalam Kelas. Jakarta: PT. Prestasi Pustakaraya.
Angdhiri, R. P. (2020). Challenges of home learning during a pandemic through the eyes of the students. https://www.thejakartapost.com/life/2020/04/11/challenges-of-home-learning-during-a-pandemic-through-the-eyes-of-a-student.html
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Cremin, Barnes, & Scoffham. (2013). Creativity in language teaching. Retrieved from http://www.professorjackric hards.com/wp-content/uploads/Creativity-in- Language-Teaching.pdf
Croply, A. J., (2001). Creativity in Education and Learning. A guide for Teachers and Educators. London: Kegan Pawl
Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist.
Fatoni, N. A., Nurkhayati, E., Nurdiawati, E., Fidziah, Pamungkas, G., Adha, S., Irawan, Purwanto, A., Julyanto, O., & Azizi, E. (2020). University students online learning system during covid-19 pandemic: advantages, constraints and solutions. Sys Rev Pharm, 11(7), 570-576
Fisher, R. (2004) What is creativity? In Robert Fisher and Mary Williams (eds.) Unlocking Creativity: Teaching Across the Curriculum 6–20. New York: Routledge.
Goldschmidt, K. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic: Technology use to support the wellbeing of children. Journal of Paediatric Nursing, 53, 88-90.
Hodges, Charles, B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference- between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online- learning
Louise, A.-L., & Andrews, T. (2009). Creating a rich learning environment for remote post-graduate leaners. Education in Rural Australia, 19(1), 3-13.
Lubart, T., Mouchiroud C., Tordjman S., & Zenasni F. (2015). Psy-chologie de la cre´ativite´, Armand Colin, Paris, France.
Moleong, L. J. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Monawati & Fauzi. (2018). Hubungan kreatifitas mengajar guru dengan prestasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Pesona Dasar, 6(2), 33-43.
Morris, W. (2006). Creativity – Its Place in Education. Future Edge Ltd based in New Plymouth New Zealand. www.leading- learning.co.nz
Mumford, M. D. (2003). "Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research". Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3),107–120.
Ng, A.-K., & Smith, I. (2004). Why is there a Paradox in promoting creativity in the Asian Classroom? In S. Lau, A. N. N. Hui & G. Y. C. Ng (Eds.), Creativity: When east meets west (pp. 87-112): World Scientific Publishing Company.
Putri, R. S., Purwanto, A., Pramono, R., Asbari, M., Yun, C. C., Wijayanti, L. M., Santoso, P. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on online home learning: an explorative study of primary schools in Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(05), 4809 - 4818. Retrieved from http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/13867
Reed, M., & Michaud, C. (2010). Goal-Driven Lesson Planning for Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Michigan Teacher Training.
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice. Amsterdam; London: Elsevier Academic Press.
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT. Gunung Rineka Cipta.
Statistics Indonesia. (2020). Potret Pendidikan Indonesia Statistik Pendidikan 2019. BPS:Jakarta. Retrieved from:https://www.bps.go.id/publication/download
Sternberg, R. J. (2011). "Creativity". Cognitive Psychology (6 ed.). Cengage Learning.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sun, Litao, Yongming, T., Wei, Z. (2020). Coronavirus pushes education online. Nature Materials, 19(6), 687- 687.
Supardan. (2010). The Development Teachers’ Creativity. Jawa Barat: Rahayasa Research and Training.
Suwartono. (2016). Teachers’ creativity in ELT. International Seminar on English Language Teaching, 1-8.
Tarjo. (2019). Metode Penelitian System 3x Baca. Sleman: Deepublish Publisher.
Terry, Hetreda, Burdam, Y., Umbase, R. S., Dasfordate, A., & Pelealu, A. E. (2018). Teacher creativity and school climate. International Conference and Social Science, 226, 708-710.
Vasudevan H. (2013). The influence of teachers’ creativity, attitude and commitmenton students’ profiency of the English languange. IOSR Journal of research & method in education (IOSR-JRME), 1(2),12-19
Witt, P., Wheeless, L., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71, 184–207.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v5i2.8655
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Tri Angkarini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License