IMPROVING STUDENT’S SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH GUIDED GRAMMAR IN POLITEKNIK KELAPA SAWIT BEKASI

Luluk SETYOWATI(1*)

(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Speaking is an important skill in language learning, it is the key of active communication. As teaching speaking is important aspect in language learning process, this is a crucial part of second language learning and teaching. Despite this fact, for many years, teaching speaking in Indonesian context has been undervalued and English language teachers have continued to teach speaking as a repetition of drills or memorization of dialogues. However, today's education world requires that the goal of teaching speaking should improve students' communicative skills. Only in this way, the students can express themselves depend on the social context. In this study, the researcher attempts to conduct a research about the use of guided grammar and its impact in speaking achievement for students of oil palm plantation processing technology program of Politeknik Kelapa Sawit Bekasi. The activities of learning grammar provide an excellent opportunity for the learners to develop this skill. The result shows that at the beginning of guided grammar, students' speaking ability is still very limited. But when the speaking assignments in guided grammar went on for quite a long time, students were getting used to speak in grammatically correct way. Students felt that their speaking skills had improved and had become better than before.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Batstone, R. (2014). Grammar. Oxford University Press

Brown, H.D. (2014). Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.

Burns, A., & Joyce, H. (2012). Focus on speaking. Sydney: National Center for English

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (2013). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language testing and teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.

Carrasqillo, A.L. (2014). Teaching bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.

Chaney, A. L and F L. Burk. 2013. Teaching Oral Communication. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Cook, V. (2016). Second language learning and language teaching (4nd ed). Arnold

Corbett, J. (2009).What is grammar and how should we teach it? Retrieved from Developing Teachers.com

Garg, S., & Gautam, A. (2015). Learning English can change your life for the better. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Humanities, III(II).

Harmer, J. (2011). The Practice of English Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Edinburgh: Longman.

Nunan, David. 2011. Language Teaching Methodology. New York: Prantice Hall Interra.

Palmer, F. (2011). Grammar. Hazell Watson and Viney Ltd.

Scarcella, R.C., & Oxford, R.L. (2012). The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

Swan, M. (2013). Seven bad reasons for teaching grammar—and two good ones. English Teaching Professional, 7, 3-5

Swetnam, Derek. (2009). Writing Your Desertation. Oxford: Cromwell Press Ltd.

Zhong-guo, LI & Song Min-yan. (2012). The relationship between traditional English grammar teaching and communicative language teaching. US-China Education Review, 4(1), 62-65.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v3i2.3402

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

scope isjd

Portal Garuda Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Web
Analytics
View My Stats

Flag Counter