An Analysis of Grammatical Error on Students’ Thesis Abstract: Frequency and Percentage
(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The goal of this study is to discover proportion of grammatical error on students’ thesis abstract. This study used descriptive qualitative research as research design. It identified, classified, and analyzed the students’ error in writing abstract based on types of errors, namely omission, addition, mis-formation, and mis-ordering. This research data consisted of 10 thesis abstracts written by the students of English education department, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung. This abstract was chosen at random from 133 theses written by students who completed their studies in 2024. The results show that this study identified 136 items of errors from ten students’ abstracts that consisted of omission (53 items), addition (37 items), mis-formation (41 items), and mis-ordering (5 items). Furthermore, it is known that the majority of students' errors in writing abstract is omission (39%). The findings indicate that the students need to comprehend grammatical rules. Furthermore, this study expects that academic supervisors will not disregard errors committed by students when they write a thesis as part of the college requirement for graduation.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Langauge Pedagogy:Second Edition. San Fransisco: San Fransisco State University.
Brown, H. D. (1980). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice Hall,Inc.
Dulay, Heidi, Burt, Marina, and Krashen, Stepsen. (1982). Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fauzan, U., Aulya, S. F., & Noor, W. N. (2020). Writing error analysis in exposition text of the EFL junior high school students.
Fauziati, E. (2009). Reading on Applied Linguistics: A Handbook for Language Teacher and Teacher Researcher. Surakarta: Pustaka Utama.
Karim, A., Mohamed, A. R., Ismail, S. A. M. M., Shahed, F. H., Rahman, M. M., & Haque, M. H. (2018). Error analysis in EFL writing classroom. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4), 122-138.
Koh, E. T., Owen, W. L., Koh, E. T., & Owen, W. L. (2000). Descriptive research and qualitative research. Introduction to Nutrition and Health research, 219-248.
Langan, J. (2001). English Skill. New York. Mc Graw-Hill Companies.Inc.
Maanen, J. V et al. (1983). Varieties of Qualitative Research. United States of America. SAGE Publications.
Myles, J. (2002). Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. Tesl-ej, 6(2), 1-20.
Sudarkam & Erniwati. (2023). Error Analysis:Types and Causes of EFL Learners ‘ Errors in Writing Analytical Exposition Text. Eralingua:Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra Vol.7 No.1, 64-77.
Sudjiono, A. (2008). Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. PT Raja Grafindo Persada Jakarta
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i1.24730
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 SCOPE : JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License