Development of Learning Trajectory for Project-Based Learning (PjBL) Model to Construct Foundational Literacies for Elementary School Students
(1) Universitas Lampung
(2) Universitas Lampung
(3) Universitas Bina Insan Lubuklinggau
(4) Universitas Lampung
(5) Universitas Lampung
(6) Universitas Lampung
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdurrahman, A., Setyaningsih, C.A., & Jalmo, T. (2019). Implementating multiple representation based worksheet to develop critical thinking skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16 (1), 138-155.
Adnan., Mulbar, U., Sugiarti., & Bahri, A. (2021). Scientific literacy skills of students: problem of biology teaching in junior high school in south Sulawesi, Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 847-860.
Akker, J.V.d., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., and Nieveen, N. (2006). Education Design Research. London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Amalia, Z., Yulianti, D., Rohman, F dan Nurhanurawati. (2023). Pengembangan E-Modul Berbasis Project Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas V. Al-Madrasah. Vol. 7, No. 4. 1875-1889 http://dx.doi.org/10.35931/am.v7i4.2739.
Aquilani, B., Piccarozzi, M., Abbate, T., & Codini, A. (2020). The role of open innovation and value co-creation in the challenging transition from industry 4.0 to society 5.0: Toward a theoretical framework. Sustainability, 12(21), 8943.
Bahri, A., Jamaluddin, A. B., Muharni, A., Fikri, M. J. N., & Arifuddin, M. (2021). The Need of Science Learning to Empower High Order Thinking Skills in 21st Century. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899 (2021) 012144, 1-8.
Brumfield J.E., Stojanovi? M. (2021). Setting Foundations for Critically Thinking Global Citizens: Developing Foundational Literacies. In Robinson, P.A., Williams, K.V., Stojanovi? M. Global Citizenship for Adult Education: Advancing Critical Literacies for Equity and Social Justice. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003050421.
Demirbag, M., & Günel, M. (2014). Integrating argument-based science inquiry with modal representations: Impact on science achievement, argumentation and writing skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 373-392.
Douglas H. Clements & Julie Sarama (2004) Learning Trajectories in Mathematics Education, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6:2, 81-89.
Gerhana, M. T. C., Mardiyana, M., & Pramudya, I. (2017). The Effectiveness of Project Based Learning in Trigonometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012027.
Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Local Instruction Theories as Means of Support for Teachers in Reform Mathematics Education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6:2, 105-128.
Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C. et al. (2017). What Mathematics Education May Prepare Students for the Society of the Future?. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 15 (Suppl 1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6.
Gravemeijer, Koeno & Paul Coob. (2006). Deisgn reseacrh form a Learning Design Perspective. In : jan Van den Akker, Koeneo Graveimejr, Susan Mckeny fan Nienke Nieveen. Educational Desaign Research . London: Routdledge.
Günel, M., & Yesildag-Hasancebi, F. (2016). Modal Representations and their Role in the Learning Process: A Theoretical and Pragmatic Analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 109-126.
Haglund, J., Jeppsson, F., & Andersson, J. (2012). Young children's analogical reasoning in science domains. Science Education, 96(4), 725-756.
Hake, R. (1999). Analyzing Change/ Gain Score. Indiana: Indiana University.
Hansen, J., and Richland, L.E. (2020). Teaching and Learning Science through Multiple Representations: Intuitions and Executive Functions. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 19 (4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0253.
Hikmat. (2022). The Readiness of Education in Indonesia in Facing The Society Era 5.0. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2) 2953 – 2961. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2526.
Hugerat, C. (2016). How teaching science using project-based learning strategies affects the classroom learning environment. Learning Environ Res (2016) 19:383–395.
Kabatas M, E. (2015). The effect of using multi modal representation on learning “force and motion” unit of students at 7 th grade. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 44(1), 23-40.
Lee McCallum. (2021). The Development of Foundational and New Literacies with Digital Tools Across the European Higher Education Area. Aula Abierta. Volumen 50, número 2, págs. 615-624. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.50.2.2021.615-624.
Lusiyana, A., Festiyed, and Yulkifli. (2020). Measuring The Physics Students’ Data Literacy Skill In The Era Of Industry 4.0 By Using Mirecal Learning Model. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9 (1), 1203-1205.
Novaristiana, R, Rinanto, Y., & Ramli, M. (2019). Scientific Literacy Profile in Biological Science of High School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(1), 9-16.
Oktaviana, D., Barizi, A., Yaqin, M.Z.N. (2022) The Challenges of The Society 5.0 Era: The Evaluation of Learning in Primary Education. Al-Adzka: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 12(1), 10-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.18592/aladzkapgmi.v12i1.5831.
Owens J. (2014) Designing a Curriculum for the Advanced Stream of a Foundational Literacies Course ISSN: 2186-5892 – The Asian Conference on Education 2013 – Official Conference Proceedings https://doi.org/10.22492/2186-5892.20130426.
Paschek, D., Luminosu, C.-T., & Ocakci, E. (2022). Industry 5.0 Challenges and Perspectives for Manufacturing Systems in the Society 5.0. In Sustainability and Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises (pp. 17–63). Springer.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
Plomp, Tjeerd, and Nieveen, Nienke. (2013). Educational design research, part a: An introduction. Enschede, Netherlands: SLO.
Pozdnyakova, U.A., Golikov, V.V., Peters, I.A., and Morozova, I.A. (2019). Genesis of the Revolutionary Transition to Industry 4.0 in the 21st Century and Overview of Previous Industrial Revolutions. Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 E. G. Popkova et al. (eds.), Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century. P 11-19.
Pramudiyanti; Pratiwi, Wulan Octi; Armansyah; Rohman, F; Putri, I. Y; Ariani, D. (2023). PBL-Based Student Worksheet to Improve Critical Thinking Ability in Science Learning in Elementary Schools. Idonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Vol. 6 No.1 109-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v6i1.17187.
Rachel Horst & Derek Gladwin. (2022). Multiple futures literacies: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2022.2094510.
Ragulina, Y.V., Alekseev, A.N., Strizhkina, I.V. and Tumanov, A.I. (2019). Methodology of Criterial Evaluation of Consequences of the Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century. Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 E. G. Popkova et al. (eds.), Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century. P 235-244.
Rohman F., Lusiyana, A., Rohim S. (2018). Modifying Model Project-Based Learning (Pjbl) dalam Kegiatan Praktikum Optik untuk Membentuk Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Pemecahan Masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hibah Program Penugasan Dosen ke Sekolah (PDS). Vol 1. No. 1. 96-103.
Rohman, F., Azzahra M., Pramudiyanti., Supriono, J., Romlah, Fitriyani. (2023). Development of Student Worksheet Based on the PBL Model to Improve Critical Thinking Skill in Phase C. Vol 12, No 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v12i4.9862.
Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the Role of Mathematical Tasks in Conceptual Learning: An Elaboration of the Hypothetical Learning Trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91–104.
Susan D. Nickerson & Ian Whitacre. (2010). A Local Instruction
Theory for the Development of Number Sense. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12:3, 227-252.
Violeta, L. (2011). A New Way of Training - Project-Based Learning. The 7thInternational Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education Bucharest, April 28-29, 2011.
Winarni, E.W., & Koto I. (2020). Pengembangan Lembar Kegiatan Mahapeserta didik (LKM) dengan Model Project-Based Learning (PjBL) untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains pada Perkuliahan IPA Pendidikan Dasar. Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran Pendidikan Dasar (JP3D). 3 (2), 134–144.
Wulandari, A.S., Suardana, I.N., & Pande, L.D.N.L. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis proyek Terhadap Kreativitas Peserta didik SMP pada Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia, 2(1), 47-48.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v8i2.22365
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 SCOPE : JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License