Development of Learning Trajectory for Project-Based Learning (PjBL) Model to Construct Foundational Literacies for Elementary School Students

Fatkhur Rohman(1*), Nelly Astuti(2), Eka Maryam(3), Erni Erni(4), Mia Azzahra(5), Jody Setya Hermawan(6)

(1) Universitas Lampung
(2) Universitas Lampung
(3) Universitas Bina Insan Lubuklinggau
(4) Universitas Lampung
(5) Universitas Lampung
(6) Universitas Lampung
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Learning trajectories oriented towards Foundational Literacies such as reading literacy, communication skills, and critical thinking need to be developed to prepare learners to face the changes of the 21st century. Learning access in Phase C requires the student to have the ability to adapt to the purpose and social context, show an interest in the text, and be able to understand, process, and interpret information. While the thinking stage of the SD pupil according to Piaget's theory, is in the concrete operational stage, therefore learning in Phase C is considered difficult for SD pupils. Teachers have not fully implemented the development of learning actively, and creatively in involving students and have not used various learning models based on the character of the learning material. That affects the achievement of the Foundational Literacies of the lower pupils. This research aims to develop a learning trajectory model of PjBL that can build the Foundational Literacies of the students in studying a topic set in Phase C. Design research used in this research comprises three stages, namely: (1) preparing for the experiment; (2) design experiment; and (3) retrospective analysis. The results of the implementation of the first prototype give a significant impact on the change in the Foundational Literacies before and after learning, but when referring to the criteria of achievement of the learning objective holistically is still in fairly good interpretation. Re-development of the learning trajectory resulting in prototype II. The implementation of the second prototype achieved an average N-Gain score of the experimental class of 78.31% and the control class has a score of 54.20%, the results of this study indicate that the Learning Trajectory for the PjBL Model effectively imply building Foundational Literacies.

Keywords


Hypothetical Learning Trajectory (HLT); PjBL Model; Foundational Literacies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdurrahman, A., Setyaningsih, C.A., & Jalmo, T. (2019). Implementating multiple representation based worksheet to develop critical thinking skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16 (1), 138-155.

Adnan., Mulbar, U., Sugiarti., & Bahri, A. (2021). Scientific literacy skills of students: problem of biology teaching in junior high school in south Sulawesi, Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 847-860.

Akker, J.V.d., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., and Nieveen, N. (2006). Education Design Research. London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Amalia, Z., Yulianti, D., Rohman, F dan Nurhanurawati. (2023). Pengembangan E-Modul Berbasis Project Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas V. Al-Madrasah. Vol. 7, No. 4. 1875-1889 http://dx.doi.org/10.35931/am.v7i4.2739.

Aquilani, B., Piccarozzi, M., Abbate, T., & Codini, A. (2020). The role of open innovation and value co-creation in the challenging transition from industry 4.0 to society 5.0: Toward a theoretical framework. Sustainability, 12(21), 8943.

Bahri, A., Jamaluddin, A. B., Muharni, A., Fikri, M. J. N., & Arifuddin, M. (2021). The Need of Science Learning to Empower High Order Thinking Skills in 21st Century. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899 (2021) 012144, 1-8.

Brumfield J.E., Stojanovi? M. (2021). Setting Foundations for Critically Thinking Global Citizens: Developing Foundational Literacies. In Robinson, P.A., Williams, K.V., Stojanovi? M. Global Citizenship for Adult Education: Advancing Critical Literacies for Equity and Social Justice. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003050421.

Demirbag, M., & Günel, M. (2014). Integrating argument-based science inquiry with modal representations: Impact on science achievement, argumentation and writing skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 373-392.

Douglas H. Clements & Julie Sarama (2004) Learning Trajectories in Mathematics Education, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6:2, 81-89.

Gerhana, M. T. C., Mardiyana, M., & Pramudya, I. (2017). The Effectiveness of Project Based Learning in Trigonometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012027.

Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Local Instruction Theories as Means of Support for Teachers in Reform Mathematics Education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6:2, 105-128.

Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C. et al. (2017). What Mathematics Education May Prepare Students for the Society of the Future?. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 15 (Suppl 1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6.

Gravemeijer, Koeno & Paul Coob. (2006). Deisgn reseacrh form a Learning Design Perspective. In : jan Van den Akker, Koeneo Graveimejr, Susan Mckeny fan Nienke Nieveen. Educational Desaign Research . London: Routdledge.

Günel, M., & Yesildag-Hasancebi, F. (2016). Modal Representations and their Role in the Learning Process: A Theoretical and Pragmatic Analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 109-126.

Haglund, J., Jeppsson, F., & Andersson, J. (2012). Young children's analogical reasoning in science domains. Science Education, 96(4), 725-756.

Hake, R. (1999). Analyzing Change/ Gain Score. Indiana: Indiana University.

Hansen, J., and Richland, L.E. (2020). Teaching and Learning Science through Multiple Representations: Intuitions and Executive Functions. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 19 (4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0253.

Hikmat. (2022). The Readiness of Education in Indonesia in Facing The Society Era 5.0. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2) 2953 – 2961. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2526.

Hugerat, C. (2016). How teaching science using project-based learning strategies affects the classroom learning environment. Learning Environ Res (2016) 19:383–395.

Kabatas M, E. (2015). The effect of using multi modal representation on learning “force and motion” unit of students at 7 th grade. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 44(1), 23-40.

Lee McCallum. (2021). The Development of Foundational and New Literacies with Digital Tools Across the European Higher Education Area. Aula Abierta. Volumen 50, número 2, págs. 615-624. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.50.2.2021.615-624.

Lusiyana, A., Festiyed, and Yulkifli. (2020). Measuring The Physics Students’ Data Literacy Skill In The Era Of Industry 4.0 By Using Mirecal Learning Model. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9 (1), 1203-1205.

Novaristiana, R, Rinanto, Y., & Ramli, M. (2019). Scientific Literacy Profile in Biological Science of High School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(1), 9-16.

Oktaviana, D., Barizi, A., Yaqin, M.Z.N. (2022) The Challenges of The Society 5.0 Era: The Evaluation of Learning in Primary Education. Al-Adzka: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 12(1), 10-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.18592/aladzkapgmi.v12i1.5831.

Owens J. (2014) Designing a Curriculum for the Advanced Stream of a Foundational Literacies Course ISSN: 2186-5892 – The Asian Conference on Education 2013 – Official Conference Proceedings https://doi.org/10.22492/2186-5892.20130426.

Paschek, D., Luminosu, C.-T., & Ocakci, E. (2022). Industry 5.0 Challenges and Perspectives for Manufacturing Systems in the Society 5.0. In Sustainability and Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises (pp. 17–63). Springer.

Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.

Plomp, Tjeerd, and Nieveen, Nienke. (2013). Educational design research, part a: An introduction. Enschede, Netherlands: SLO.

Pozdnyakova, U.A., Golikov, V.V., Peters, I.A., and Morozova, I.A. (2019). Genesis of the Revolutionary Transition to Industry 4.0 in the 21st Century and Overview of Previous Industrial Revolutions. Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 E. G. Popkova et al. (eds.), Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century. P 11-19.

Pramudiyanti; Pratiwi, Wulan Octi; Armansyah; Rohman, F; Putri, I. Y; Ariani, D. (2023). PBL-Based Student Worksheet to Improve Critical Thinking Ability in Science Learning in Elementary Schools. Idonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Vol. 6 No.1 109-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v6i1.17187.

Rachel Horst & Derek Gladwin. (2022). Multiple futures literacies: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2022.2094510.

Ragulina, Y.V., Alekseev, A.N., Strizhkina, I.V. and Tumanov, A.I. (2019). Methodology of Criterial Evaluation of Consequences of the Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century. Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 E. G. Popkova et al. (eds.), Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century. P 235-244.

Rohman F., Lusiyana, A., Rohim S. (2018). Modifying Model Project-Based Learning (Pjbl) dalam Kegiatan Praktikum Optik untuk Membentuk Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Pemecahan Masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hibah Program Penugasan Dosen ke Sekolah (PDS). Vol 1. No. 1. 96-103.

Rohman, F., Azzahra M., Pramudiyanti., Supriono, J., Romlah, Fitriyani. (2023). Development of Student Worksheet Based on the PBL Model to Improve Critical Thinking Skill in Phase C. Vol 12, No 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v12i4.9862.

Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the Role of Mathematical Tasks in Conceptual Learning: An Elaboration of the Hypothetical Learning Trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91–104.

Susan D. Nickerson & Ian Whitacre. (2010). A Local Instruction

Theory for the Development of Number Sense. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12:3, 227-252.

Violeta, L. (2011). A New Way of Training - Project-Based Learning. The 7thInternational Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education Bucharest, April 28-29, 2011.

Winarni, E.W., & Koto I. (2020). Pengembangan Lembar Kegiatan Mahapeserta didik (LKM) dengan Model Project-Based Learning (PjBL) untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains pada Perkuliahan IPA Pendidikan Dasar. Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran Pendidikan Dasar (JP3D). 3 (2), 134–144.

Wulandari, A.S., Suardana, I.N., & Pande, L.D.N.L. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis proyek Terhadap Kreativitas Peserta didik SMP pada Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia, 2(1), 47-48.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v8i2.22365

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 SCOPE : JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

scope isjd

Portal Garuda Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Web
Analytics
View My Stats

Flag Counter