Promoting Students’ English Vocabulary through Explicit Morphological Instructions and Exploring Students’ Perceptions

Asfi Aniuranti(1*), Yasinta Wulandari(2), M.Happy Nur Tsani(3)

(1) Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Purwokerto
(2) Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Purwokerto
(3) Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Purwokerto
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research aims to enhance students’ English vocabulary mastery through explicit morphological instructions as well as to investigate students’ perceptions of its usage during online learning. This research was a classroom action research consisting of two cycles. The researchers employed a test, observation sheet, and questionnaire to obtain the data. Furthermore, the data gathered was analysed using simple statistical analysis such as average score, percentage, and percentage enhancement. After implementing explicit morphological instructions, there was an enhancement in students’ vocabulary mastery. In cycle 1, the enhancement of the average score from pre-test to post-test was 7.9%. Therefore, the team concurred to conduct cycle 2. In cycle 2, the improvement of students’ vocabulary mastery achieved 27%. This percentage surpassed the success criteria of this action research (15%). Therefore, the team ended the action research. In addition, the students also responded to the usage of explicit morphological instructions positively. Most of the students agreed or strongly agreed with each item in the questionnaire. These results indicate positive responses. In short, explicit morphological instructions could promote students’ vocabulary mastery, and this strategy receives positive feedback from the students.


Keywords


English Vocabulary, Students’ Voices, Explicit Morphological Instructions, Online Learning, Action Research

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam. (2018). Relationship between morphological awareness and vocabulary mastery. Anglo-Saxon, 9(1), 24–31.

Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, III(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.20472/te.2015.3.3.002.

Alsaeedi, W. A. (2017). The Role of Morphological Awareness in Vocabulary Acquisition in English of Saudi EFL Learners (Vol. 26). Seattle Pacific University.

Aniuranti, A. (2021). The use of ice breakers in online English grammar. Surakarta English and Literature Journal, 4(2), 85–97.

Anwar, I., & Rosa, R. N. (2020). The role of morphological awareness and explicit morphological instructions in ELT. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 4(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v4i1.1825.

Arikunto, S. (2014). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta. http://r2kn.litbang.kemkes.go.id:8080/handle/123456789/62880.

Bian, X., & He, J. (2017). The impact of morphological awareness on vocabulary knowledge of advanced Chinese EFL learners. International Dialogues on Education Journal, 4(3), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.53308/ide.v4i3.89.

Brinton, L. J., & Brinton, D. M. (2010). The Linguistic Structure of Modern English. Philadelpia: John Benjamins B.V. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.156.

Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the Structure and Meaning of Morphologically Complex Words: Impact on Reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1023/A.

Deacon, S. H., Benere, J., & Pasquarella, A. (2012). Reciprocal relationship: children’s morphological to 3 awareness and their reading accuracy across grades 2. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029474.

Efriana, L. (2021). Problems of online learning during Covid-19 pandemic in EFL classroom and the solution. JELITA:Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature, 2(1), 38–47.

Giyatmi, G. (2019). Morphology for English teaching. The 2nd International Conference on Language, Literature, and Teaching, 33–41.

Jeffries, L. (2006). Discovering Language: The Structure of Modern English. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN.

Kusuma, W., & Dwitagama, D. (2010). Mengenal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. In Mengenal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. PT Indeks.

McCarthy, M., & O’Dell, F. (1999). Vocabulary in Use. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1zgwmg8.10.

Nartiningrum, N., & Nugroho, A. (2021). English teachers’ perspectives on challenges, suggestions, and materials of online teaching amidst the global pandemic. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 8(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v8i1.17886.

Nurhemida. (2007). The Relationship between Morphological Awareness and English Vocabulary Knowledge of Indonesian Senior High School Students (Issue November) [The University of Queensland]. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/Thesis/Thesis-Nurhemida.pdf.

Oz, H. (2014). Morphology and Implications for English Language Teaching. In Linguistics for English language teaching studies (Issue October, pp. 83–120). Ani Publishing. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4908.7685.

Rabadi, R. I. (2019). Morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge among English language learners. Arab World English Journal, 10(3), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no3.4.

Redman, S. (2003). English Vocabulary in Use: Pre-intermediate and Intermediate. Cambridge University Press.

Redman, S., & Gairns, R. (2003). Test Your English Vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.

Sa’D, S. H. T., & Rajabi, F. (2018). Teaching and learning vocabulary: what English language learners perceive to be effective and ineffective strategies. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 8(1), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.492.

Simanjuntak, H. L. (2021). Vocabulary learning strategies used by undergraduate students. SCOPE : Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v6i1.9976.

Sparks, E., & Deacon, S. H. (2015). Morphological awareness and vocabulary acquisition: a longitudinal examination of their relationship in English-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000246.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Susanto, A. (2017). The teaching of vocabulary. Jurnal KATA, 1(2), 182–191. https://www.researchgate.net.

Suwartono. (2014). Dasar-Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Penerbit ANDI.

Wiley, L. S. (2015). The Effects of Explicit Morphology Instruction on Vocabulary Skills in Four Struggling Middle School Readers. Cardinal Stritch University.

Winarni, E. W. (2018). Teori dan Praktik Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif: Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) Research and Development R&D. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Yasin, M. S. M., & Jawad, H. F. (2015). Morphological awareness and its relationship to vocabulary knowledge and morphological complexity among Omani EFL university students. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(6), 223–234. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/Thesis/Thesis-Al-Farsi.pdf?origin=publication_detail.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v7i1.13892

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Asfi Aniuranti, Yasinta Wulandari, M.Happy Nur Tsani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

scope isjd

Portal Garuda Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Web
Analytics
View My Stats

Flag Counter