Flipped Classroom, Teaching Solution for Writing Class

Nugroho Nugroho
Dwi Rorin M Insana


The research was designed to investigate the result of a study comparing two English writing classes of  Indraprasta PGRI University student in  the sixth semester of 2015/2016. There were thirty students for each class chosen randomly. The research was conducted from March to July 2016. One class was taught in a traditional way and the other using the flipped method. A test is given at the end of the treatment to detect the level of student understanding. Results of post test are  compared using t-test to gauge whether the method of "Flipped Classroom" has effect on student understanding. This research is a field research with posttest-only control group design method. The theoryused to determine the ability of the students is a statistical theory  by Sudjana, cohesion were analyzed using the theory of Cohesion in English by Halliday and Hassan. Factors affect the ability to write theory by Harmer. The study resulted tcount 2,256 and ttable 1.67 at ? = 0.05 level. So tcount> ttable, so that Ho refused mean significant. It can be concluded also that there is a positive and significant influence.

Full Text:



Achmad Sjamsuri, Siti Jubei, Elvino Presli. 2016. Panduan Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah pada Jurnal Ilmiah Berkala. Jakarta: Unindra Press

Adrian Leis, Simon Cooke, Akihiko Tohei. 2015. The Effects of Flipped Classrooms on English Composition Writing in an EFL Environment. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT). Vol. 5 No.4:37-51

Andrade, H. G. 1997. Understanding Rubrics. Eduacational Leaderships. http://www.middleweb.com/ rubricsHD.html.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta.

Bergmann, Jonathan, Sams, Aaron. 2012. Flip Your Classroom Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. USA: International Society for Technology in Education.

Brown, Doughlas H. 2007. Principle of Language Learning and Teaching. New York : Pearson Education.

I. M. A. R. Antara. 2015. Keterampilan Menulis Wacana Argumentasi Berbahasa Inggris Dengan Metode Esa Pada Mahasiswa Stie Triatma Mulya Level Post Intermediate. Thesis. Denpasar: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Udayana Denpasar

Keraf, Gorys. 2004. Argumentasi dan narasi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Komaidi, Didik. 2007. Aku Bisa Menulis. Panduan Praktis Menulis Kreatif Lengkap. Yogyakarta: Sabda Media

Lilian Farag Allah. 2013. Coherence and Cohesion in Academic Writing. https://www.tesol.org/connect/tesol-resource-center/search-details/lesson-plans/2013/08/23/coherence-and-cohesion-in-academic-writing

Oshima, Alice, Hogue, Ann. 1999. Writing Academic English. New York. Pearson Education.

Sudjana. 1996. Metoda Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito

Sumaryoto. 2015. Panduan Penulisan Skripsi/Tugas Akhir, dan Tesis. Jakarta: Unindra Press

Suryabrata. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Widiantoro. 2012. Jumlah tebitan Buku di Indonesia Rendah. Jakarta: Kompas.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v2i02.1109

Article metrics

Abstract views : 389 | Full Text views : 195


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 SCOPE: Journal of English Language Teaching

scope isjd

Portal Garuda Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

View My Stats

Flag Counter