Perbedaan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Ditinjau dari Jalur Seleksi Masuk Perguruan Tinggi

Anas Ma'ruf Annizar; Miftah Arifin

doi:10.30998/sap.v5i3.8411

Perbedaan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Ditinjau dari Jalur Seleksi Masuk Perguruan Tinggi

Anas Ma'ruf Annizar^(1*), Miftah Arifin⁽²⁾

(1)
(2) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Jember
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The problem brought in this study is how the difference in student achievement is reviewed from the college entrance pathways. Based on that problem, this study aimed at determining whether or not there are differences in student achievement based on college entrance pathways. This study used a quantitative research approach, which included several hypothesis tests such as normality test, homogeneity test, anova test, and kruskall test. This research was conducted in 2020 with a sample of 1,215 students of IAIN Jember. The results showed that the Grade Point Average (GPA) of UMPTKIN students was significantly different, which was greater than the GPA of SPAN students and the GPA of Mandiri students class 2016-2017. For students of class 2017-2018, the GPA of UMPTKIN students was greater than the GPA of Mandiri students. For 2018-2019 students, the GPA of SPAN students was greater than the GPA of UMPTKIN students, and the GPA of UMPTKIN students was greater than that of Mandiri students. Whereas for 2019-2020 students, there was no significant difference between the 3 groups of students. From the data of 4 batches of students, it can be seen that students who entered through the Mandiri pathway have low achievement compared to the others. Meanwhile, students who entered through UMPTKIN and SPAN always compete to achieve their achievements.

Keywords

professional teacher, scientific work, professional development

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References

A. M. Annizar, Sisworo, dan Sudirman. “Pemecahan Masalah Menggunakan Model IDEAL pada Siswa Kelas X Berkategori Fast-Accurate”. J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, dan Pengemb., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 634–640, 2018.

G. F. Khairunnisa, M. A. Maulyda, A. M. Annizar, L. Hijriani, dan M. S. Khair. “Mathematics Communication : Translation of Elementary Students ’ Idea”. Numer. J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 77–86, 2020, doi: 10.25217/numerical.v4i2.781.

A. M. Annizar, Masrurotullaily, M. H. D. Jakaria, M. Mukhlis, dan F. Apriyono. “Problem Solving Analysis of Rational Inequality Based on IDEAL Model”. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1465, no. 1, pp. 012033-012047, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012033.

R. Efiyanna. “Prestasi Belajar menurut Jalur Masuk Seleksi Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru di Politeknik Kemenkes Jakarta II”. J. Biostat. dan Kependud. Univ. Indonesia., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2013.

A. C. Lestari dan A. M. Annizar. “Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah PISA Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi”. J. Kiprah, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 46–55, 2020.

M. Irhas. “Analisis Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Menurut Jalur Penerimaan Mahasisswa Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi FMIPA UNNES”. Disertasi Univ Negeri Semarang, 2017.

A. N. Aini, M. Mukhlis, A. M. Annizar, M. H. D. Jakaria, and D. D. Septiadi. “Creative Thinking Level of Visual-Spatial Students on Geometry HOTS Problems”. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1465, no. 1, pp. 012054-12060, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012054.

D. Lestari, H. Anis, dan Khaeruddin. “Analisis Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Jurusan Fisika Berdasarkan Jalur Masuk (SNMPTN, SBMPTN dan Mandiri) Universitas Negeri Makassar”. J. Sains dan Pendidik. Fis., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 15–25, 2018.

K. R. Suwena. “Jalur Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru Bukan Penentu Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa”. Ekuitas-Jurnal Pendidik. Ekon., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2017.

Y. Claudya, Ngadimin, dan Melvina, “Perbedaan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Jalur Seleksi Masuk Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Syiah Kuala”. J. Ilm. Mhs. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 321–325, 2017.

F. Dinarti dan Martadi. “Orientasi Jalur Seleksi Masuk Perguruan Tinggi terhadap Perbedaan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Angkatan 2012-2014 Jurusan Pendidikan Seni Rupa Universitas Negeri Surabaya”. J. Pendidik. Seni Rupa, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 166–172, 2015.

Nurhasanah, Purwati, dan H. Ahmda. “Pengaruh Sistem Seleksi Masuk Perguruan Tinggi terhadap Indeks Prestasi Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Papua (UNIPA)”. Pros. Semin. Nas., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 114–120, 2015.

Priyougie, A. Haq, dan S. Iriawan. “Analisis Perbedaan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Seleksi Masuk Jurusan Akuntansi Politeknik Negeri Banjarmasin”. J. INTEKNA, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 53–59, 2019.

A. T. Handayani. “Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan Orang Tua dan Jalur Masuk terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Akuntansi (Studi pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Akuntansi Universitas Brawijaya Malang)”. J. Pena Ilm., vol 2, no.2, pp. 1–10, 2010.

Sardjito, N. Junaedi, T. Suhaeni, dan M. Yuswandono. “Kajian Seleksi Mahasiswa Baru Politeknik Negeri Bandung Melalui Jalur Penelusuran Minat dan Kemampuan (PMDK)”. Sigma-Mu, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 68–82, 2013.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i3.8411