Kesalahan Logis pada Teks Eksposisi Hortatori Siswa SMA N 54 Jakarta

Ni Ketut Pertiwi Anggraeni

doi:10.30998/sap.v5i1.6580

Kesalahan Logis pada Teks Eksposisi Hortatori Siswa SMA N 54 Jakarta

Ni Ketut Pertiwi Anggraeni^(1*)

(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Logical Fallacies are the flaws that occur within an argument. Logical fallacies on hortatory exposition text happen because it involves invalid argument as the main point of this text. This research aims to discover types of logical fallacies that mostly found in hortatory exposition text written by the students of SMA N 54 Jakarta. This research took the logical fallacies from 80 texts written by the eleventh graders. Those logical fallacies were then classified into the classification of logical fallacies by Seyler. The result obtained were described using qualitative method with descriptive analysis as the main tool in interpreting the data. The result of this research discovered that begging the question is the type of logical fallacies that mostly found in the text of hortatory exposition of SMA N 54 Jakarta students.

Keywords

Logical Fallacies, Argument, Hortatory Exposition.

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References

V. Kurniawan and Fitrawati. “Teaching Hortatory Exposition by Using Stop and Dare Strategy to Senior High School Students”. JELT, vol. 3, pp. 159–167, 2014.

M. Geraldine. “The Effectiveness of Four Corners Strategy in Teaching Writing Hortatory Exposition Text”. Int. J. Multi Disipline Sci., vol. 1,no. 2, pp. 95–103, 2018. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/ij-mds.v1i1.425 International.

J. D. Ramage, J. C. Bean, and J. Johnson. Writing Arguments, A Rhetoric with Readings, 10th ed. USA: Pearson, 2010.

D. S. Istiningdias dan G. Argenti. “Logical Fallacy dalam Narasi Media CNN Indonesia ‘Pemerintahan Boneka di Era Jokowi-JK’”. AKRAB JUARA, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 28–42, 2019. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

D. U. Seyler. Read, Reason, Write, 5th ed. Boston: Mc-Graw Hill, 1999.

Y. S. Utami, E. Ratna, dan C. Wirsal. “Hubungan Kemampuan Membaca Kritis dengan Kemampuan Menulis Argumentasi Siswa Kelas XISMAN 1 Kinali”. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia,vol. 1, no. 1pp. 139-144, 2012.

I. Nurmahanani. “Penerapan Strategi Metakognisi dan Berpikir Kritis dalam Menulis Argumentasi pada Mahasiswa PGSD UPI Kampus Purwakarta”. Metod. Didakt., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 57–68, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.17509/md.v10i1.3242.

L. Cowen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison. Research methods in education, 6th ed., vol. 38, no. 3. USA: Routledge, 2007.

N. Alagozlu. “Critical Thinking and Voice in EFL Writing”. Asian EFL J., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 118–136, 2007.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i1.6580