Statistics Self-Concept, Statistics Self Efficacy dan Statistic Anxiety Mahasiswa Non-Eksakta: Analisis Model Sequential Explanatory

Muh Gazali; Mursyid Mursyid

doi:10.30998/sap.v9i2.24929

Statistics Self-Concept, Statistics Self Efficacy dan Statistic Anxiety Mahasiswa Non-Eksakta: Analisis Model Sequential Explanatory

Muh Gazali^(1*), Mursyid Mursyid⁽²⁾

(1) UIN STS Jambi
(2) Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, Universitas Negeri Sulthan Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Statistic emerges concern for social science students. Especially those who do not have sufficient mathematical experience, so they tend to build a negative paradigm towards statistics. The aim of this study was to build an argument related to the statistical attitude of social science students towards statistics and the statistical learning process through the integration of quantitative data and qualitative data, then proposes several important points to build effective statistics learning for social science students. Sampling of the number of Islamic Religious Universities in Jambi Province and the number of students used non-probability sampling. So that 3 universities and 375 students of the Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty were obtained who took the Education Statistics course in the 2021/2022 academic year. Dealing with the sequential explanatory model analysis, this study argued that high or low anxiety in understanding the material and anxiety in completing statistical tasks were influenced by statistics self-concept and statistical self-efficacy. Furthermore, several factors that cause low statistical self-concept and statistical self-efficacy and were followed by high statistics anxiety were math experience, online learning system, statistics teacher competence, and assignment of statistical tasks beyond normal limits.

Keywords

Statistics, Social Science Students, Sequential Explanatory

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References

S. N. Afifiah dan E. J. Wicaksana, “Persepsi Mahasiswa tentang Mata Kuliah Statistik serta Pengaruhnya terhadap Prestasi Belajar Statistik Mahasiswa IKIP PGRI Madiun,” J. Care, vol. 02, pp. 1–8, 2014.

M. Ulpah, “Belajar Statistika : Mengapa dan Bagaimana ?,” vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2009, [Online]. Available: DOI 10.24090/insania.v14i3.354

A. Brezavš?ek, P. Šparl, and A. Žnidarši?, “Factors Influencing The Behavioural Intention to Use Statistical Software: The Perspective of The Slovenian Students of Social Sciences,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 953–986, 2017, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00652a.

T. Prayoga and J. Abraham, “A Psychological Model Explaining Why We Love or Hate Statistics,” Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.kjss.2016.08.013.

N. A. Rector, D. Bourdeau, K. Kitchen, and M. L. Joseph-Massiah, Anxiety Disorders an Information Guide. 2016.

K. H. P. Chew and D. B. Dillon, “Statistics Anxiety and The Big Five Personality Factors,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 112, no. Iceepsy 2013, pp. 1177–1186, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1282.

F. Erdogan and S. Sengul, “A Study on the Elementary School Students’ Mathematics Self Concept,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 152, no. 507, pp. 596–601, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.249.

J. Ferla, M. Valcke, and Y. Cai, “Academic Self-Efficacy and Academic Self-Concept: Reconsidering Sructural Relationships,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 499–505, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.05.004.

A. González, Y. Rodríguez, J. M. Faílde, and M. V Carrera, “Anxiety in The Statistics Class : Structural Relations with Self-Concept, Untrinsic Value, and Engagement in Two Samples of Undergraduates,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 45, pp. 214–221, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.019.

A. Ozkan and E. Mehmet, “Misconceptions and Learning Difficulties in Radical Numbers,” vol. 46, pp. 462–467, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.142.

M. G. Lavasani, M. Weisani, and F. Shariati, “The Role of Achievement Goals, Academic Motivation in Statistics Anxiety: Testing a Causal Model,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 114, pp. 933–938, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.810.

K. T. Hau and H. W. Marsh, Academic Self-Concept and Achievement, Second Edi., vol. 1. Elsevier, 2015. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92153-6.

J. Lee, “Universals and Specifics of Math Self-Concept, Math Self-Efficacy, and Math Anxiety Across 41 PISA 2003 Participating Countries,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 355–365, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.009.

C. A. McKim, “The Value of Mixed Methods Research: A Mixed Methods Study,” J. Mix. Methods Res., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 202–222, 2017, doi: 10.1177/1558689815607096.

J. W. Creswell, M. D. Fetters, and N. V. Ivankova, “Designing a Mixed Methods Study in Primary Care,” Ann. Fam. Med., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2004, doi: 10.1370/afm.104.

D. A. Abowitz and T. M. Toole, “Mixed Method Research: Fundamental Issues of Design, Validity, and Reliability in Construction Research,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 108–116, 2010, doi: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000026.

M. R. Guével and J. Pommier, “Mixed Methods Research in Public Health: Issues and Illustration,” Sante Publique (Paris)., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 23–38, 2012, doi: 10.3917/spub.121.0023.

J. F. Molina-Azorin, “Mixed Methods Research: an Opportunity to Improve Our Studies and Our Research Skills,” Eur. J. Manag. Bus. Econ., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 37–38, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.redeen.2016.05.001.

N. V. Ivankova, J. W. Creswell, and S. L. Stick, “Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: from Theory to Practice,” Field methods, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3–20, 2006, doi: 10.1177/1525822X05282260.

K. M. T. Collins and A. J. Onwuegbuzie, “A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research,” Qual. Rep., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 281–316, 2007.

E. Mulyatiningsih and A. Nuryanto, “Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan,” 2014.

M. Filiz, E. Early, A. Thurston, and S. Miller, “Measuring and Improving University Students’ Statistics Self-Concept: a Systematic Review,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 1, no. November, p. 100020, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100020.

S. J. Finney and G. Schraw, “Self-Efficacy Beliefs in College Statistics Courses,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 161–186, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00015-2.

D. Hanna, M. Shevlin, and M. Dempster, “The Structure of The Statistics Anxiety Rating Scale: a Confirmatory Factor Analysis Using UK Psychology Students,” Pers. Individ. Dif., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 68–74, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.021.

T. Nielsen and S. Kreiner, “Measuring Statistical Anxiety and Attitudes toward Statistics: The Development of a Comprehensive Danish Instrument (HFS-R),” Cogent Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2018, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2018.1521574.

H. Taherdoost, “Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research,” SSRN Electron. J., no. September, 2018, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3205040.

S. Kesici, M. Baloglu, and M. E. Deniz, “Self-regulated Learning Strategies in Relation with Statistics Anxiety,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 472–477, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.02.006.

C. Gugiu and M. Gugiu, “Determining The Minimum Reliability Standard Based on a Decision Criterion,” J. Exp. Educ., vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 458–472, 2018, doi: 10.1080/00220973.2017.1315712.

K. Barbeau, K. Boileau, F. Sarr, and K. Smith, “Path Analysis in Mplus: a Tutorial Using a Conceptual Model of Psychological and Behavioral Antecedents of Bulimic Symptoms in Young Adults,” Quant. Methods Psychol., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 38–53, 2019, doi: 10.20982/tqmp.15.1.p038.

John Creswell, Reseach Design. Yogyakarta: Duta Media Publishing, 2016.

H. M. Judi and N. Sahari, “Student Centered Learning in Statistics: Analysis of Systematic Review,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 103, no. 1996, pp. 844–851, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.406.

R. A. Funny, M. A. Ghofur, W. Oktiningrum, and N. L. S. Nuraini, “Reflective Thinking Skills of Engineering Students in Learning Statistics,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 445–458, 2019, doi: 10.22342/jme.10.3.9446.445-458.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sap.v9i2.24929