Hubungan antara Faktor Eksternal dan Internal selama Pembelajaran Daring pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah

Ahmad Kamal Sudrajat; Dwi Arianita Wulan Sari; Dita Purwinda Anggrella

doi:10.30998/sap.v8i1.17089

Hubungan antara Faktor Eksternal dan Internal selama Pembelajaran Daring pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah

Ahmad Kamal Sudrajat^(1*), Dwi Arianita Wulan Sari⁽²⁾, Dita Purwinda Anggrella⁽³⁾

(1) Departemen Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
(2) SMPN 2 Dau Satu Atap. Kabupaten Malang
(3) Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah, UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

External factors are thought to have a relationship with internal factors in the learning process of secondary students. However, there is still little research conducted to determine the relationship between the two factors. This research was conducted to determine the relationship between external factors and internal factors in online learning for high school students. Data were obtained by distributing questionnaires to high school students using the snowball technique. Data was collected from June 2021 to July 2021, and 513 responses were obtained. The data obtained was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results of this study indicate that gender has a relationship with independent learning, environmental management, and student task strategies. The student's school level is related to learning readiness, learning control, and student learning motivation. Gadget ownership status is correlated with students' self-directed learning. While the type of internet access has nothing to do with any factor. This research will help determine the conditions and development of students during online learning. In addition, various parties can use it to improve the quality of online learning among children.

Keywords

External Factors, Internal Factors, Online Learning, High School Students

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References

Ibrohim, A. K. Sudrajat, and M. Saefi, “Assessing Indonesian Teacher’s Perspective on the Implementation of Distance Learning due to COVID-19 Based on Online Survey,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 18, pp. 46–59, 2021, doi: 10.36681/tused.2021.71.

O. B. Adedoyin and E. Soykan, “Covid-19 Pandemic and Online Learning: The Challenges and Opportunities,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180.

P. Qiao, X. Zhu, Y. Guo, Y. Sun, and C. Qin, “The Development and Adoption of Online Learning in Pre- and Post-COVID-19: Combination of Technological System Evolution Theory and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology,” J. Risk Financ. Manag., vol. 14, no. 4, p. 162, 2021, doi: 10.3390/jrfm14040162.

J. M. R. Asio, E. Gadia, E. Abarintos, D. Paguio, and M. Balce, “Internet Connection and Learning Device Availability of College Students: Basis for Institutionalizing Flexible Learning in the New Normal,” Stud. Humanit. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–69, 2021, doi: 10.48185/she.v2i1.224.

S. Smith, P. Burdette, G. Cheatham, and S. Harvey, “Parental Role and Support for Online Learning of Students with Disabilities: A Paradigm Shift.,” J. Spec. Educ. Leadersh., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 101–112, 2016.

S. A. Aslan, Y. E. Turgut, and A. Aslan, “Teachers’ Views Related the Middle School Curriculum for Distance Education During The COVID-19 Pandemic,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 7381–7405, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10587-z.

X. Wei, N. Saab, and W. Admiraal, “Do Learners Share The Same Perceived Learning Outcomes in MOOCs? Identifying The Role of Motivation, Perceived Learning Support, Learning Engagement, and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 56, no. August 2022, p. 100880, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100880.

N. Michailidis, E. Kapravelos, and T. Tsiatsos, “Examining The Effect of Interaction Analysis on Supporting Students’ Motivation and Learning Strategies in Online Blog-based Secondary Education Programming Courses,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 665–676, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1678487.

H. Dehghan, S. V. Esmaeili, F. Paridokht, N. Javadzade, and M. Jalali, “Assessing The Students’ Readiness for E-Learning During The Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case Study,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 8, p. e10219, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10219.

M. ?uriši? and M. Bunijevac, “Parental Involvement as a Important Factor for Successful Education,” Cent. Educ. Policy Stud. J., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 137–153, 2017, doi: 10.26529/cepsj.291.

R. Yilmaz, F. G. K. Yilmaz, and C. C. Ezin, “Self-directed Learning with Technology and Academic Motivation as Predictors of Tablet PC Acceptance,” Handb. Res. Mob. Devices Smart Gadgets K-12 Educ., no. December 2018, pp. 87–102, 2017, doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-2706-0.ch007.

O. D. Apuke and T. O. Iyendo, “University Students’ Usage of The Internet Resources for Research and Learning: Forms of Access and Perceptions of Utility,” Heliyon, vol. 4, no. 12, p. e01052, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01052.

J. Saunders, L. Davis, T. Williams, and J. H. Williams, “Gender Differences in Self-Perceptions and Academic Outcomes: A Study of African American High School Students.,” J. Youth Adolesc., vol. 33, pp. 81–90, 2004, doi: 10.1023/A:1027390531768.

A. Morante, V. Djenidi, H. Clark, and S. West, “Gender Differences in Online Participation: Examining a History and a Mathematics Open Foundation Online Course,” Aust. J. Adult Learn., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 266–293, 2017.

B. M. Hicks, W. Johnson, W. G. Iacono, and M. McGue, “Moderating Effects of Personality on The Genetic and Environmental Influences of School Grades Helps to Explain Sex Differences in Scholastic Achievement.,” European Journal of Personality, vol. 22. John Wiley & Sons, Hicks, Brian M.: Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN, US, 55455, hicks013@umn.edu, pp. 247–268, 2008. doi: 10.1002/per.671.

A. R. Pratama and L. L. Scarlatos, “Ownership and Use of Mobile Devices Among Adolescents in Indonesia,” J. Educ. Technol. Syst., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 356–384, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0047239519886584.

A. Ihwanah, T. Handayani, and N. Laily, “The Impact of Gadget Use on Online Learning During The Covid-19 Pandemic on The Character of Elementary School Students,” J. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 232–235, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://seaninstitute.org/infor/index.php/pendidikan/article/view/461%0Ahttp://seaninstitute.org/infor/index.php/pendidikan/article/download/461/395

N. Z. Hasanah, I. Istiqomah, and K. D. Saputra, “The Effect of Using Gadgets on The Level of Learning and Spirituality of Students During The Covid-19 Pandemic,” Edunesia J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 66–77, 2022, doi: 10.51276/edu.v3i1.220.

M. T. Rizki, K. Kustiono, and Y. Utanto, “Parent Assistance in The Use of Gadgets for Early Childhood Learning Process,” Innov. J. Curric. Educ. Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 132–139, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujet/article/view/

L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education, 8th ed. New York: Routledge, 2018.

O. T. Arulogun, O. N. Akande, A. T. Akindele, and T. A. Badmus, “Survey Dataset on Open and Distance Learning Students’ Intention to Use Social Media and Emerging Technologies for Online Facilitation,” Data Br., vol. 31, p. 105929, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105929.

R. Martinez-Lopez, C. Yot, I. Tuovila, and V. H. Perera-Rodríguez, “Online Self-Regulated Learning Questionnaire in a Russian MOOC,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 75, pp. 966–974, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.015.

G. M. Rafique, K. Mahmood, N. F. Warraich, and S. U. Rehman, “Readiness for Online Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of Pakistani LIS Students,” J. Acad. Librariansh., vol. 47, no. 3, p. 102346, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102346.

P. K. Kopalle and D. R. Lehmann, “Alpha Inflation? The Impact of Eliminating Scale Items on Cronbach’s Alpha,” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 189–197, 1997, doi: 10.1006/obhd.1997.2702.

R. G. G. Carvalho, “Gender Differences in Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Personality,” Pers. Individ. Dif., vol. 94, pp. 54–58, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.011.

M. F. Khesht?Masjedi et al., “The Relationship Between Gender, Age, Anxiety, Depression, and Academic Achievement Among Teenagers,” J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 799–804, 2019, doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc.

F. Kurth, L. Jancke, and E. Luders, “The Sexual Dimorphism of Broca’s Region: More Gray Matter in Female Brains in Brodmann Areas 44 and 45,” J. Neurosci. Res., vol. 95, no. 1–2, pp. 139–148, 2017, doi: 10.1002/jnr.23898.The.

T. Tao, L. Wang, C. Fan, and W. Gao, “Development of Self-Control in Children Aged 3 to 9 Years: Perspective from a Dual-Systems Model,” Sci. Rep., vol. 4, 2014, doi: 10.1038/srep07272.

B. R. Zubkovi?, R. Pahljina-Reini?, and S. K.- Vehovec, “Age and Gender Differences in Mathematics Learning During School Transition,” Int. J. Sch. Educ. Psychol., pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.1080/21683603.2021.1934206.

R.-E. Ina, K. Morana, and M. Irena, “Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja,” Zb. Instituta za Pedagos. Istraz., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 162–197, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI1901162R

K. Nam, “Until When Does The Effect of Age on Academic Achievement Persist? Evidence from Korean data,” Econ. Educ. Rev., vol. 40, pp. 106–122, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.02.002.

S. P. K. Aheto and J. Cronje, “Digital Device Ownership and Learning Environment Preferences of Students in South Africa and Ghana,” Turkish Online J. Distance Educ., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 93–111, 2018, doi: 10.17718/tojde.445093.

M. Sharples et al., “Innovating Pedagogy 2014: Open University Innovation Report 3,” Milton Keynes, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://tel.ioe.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/BeyondPrototypes.pdf,

G. Witecki and B. Nonnecke, “Engagement in Digital Lecture Halls: a Study of Student Course Engagement and Mobile Device Use During Lecture,” J. Inf. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 73–90, 2015, doi: 10.28945/2103.

J. Gikas and M. M. Grant, “Mobile Computing Devices in Higher Education: Student Perspectives on Learning with Cellphones, Smartphones & Social Media,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 19, pp. 18–26, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002.

E. Papanis, P. Giavrimis, and E. M. Papani, “The Contribution of The Internet Into Learning,” Rev. Eur. Stud., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 2010, doi: 10.5539/res.v2n1p54.

K. J. Carstens, J. M. Mallon, M. Bataineh, and A. Al-Bataineh, “Effects of Technology on Student Learning,” TOJET Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 105–113, 2021.

M. Diniyyah, H. Susilo, B. Balqis, and A. K. Sudrajat, “Improving Critical Thinking and Problem- Solving Skills Through POGIL Combined with Digital Mind Map,” J. Pendidik. Biol. Indones., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 275–286, 2022.

H. Susilo and A. K. Sudrajat, “STEM Learning and its Barrier in Schools: The Case of Biology Teachers in Malang City,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1563, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1563/1/012042.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sap.v8i1.17089