Exploring Teachers’ Insights on Teaching Students Reading to Learn Mathematics

Khairiani Idris(1*), Setiawan Setiawan(2)

(1) IAIN Lhokseumawe
(2) IAIN Lhokseumawe
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The ability to read to learn mathematics is prominent for students not only for them to become independent learners but also to develop their mathematical literacy skills. This is a phenomenography study conducted to describe mathematics teachers’ perspectives on teaching mathematics reading, teaching strategies of mathematics reading they applied in classes, and their perspectives on high-quality mathematics textbooks. The study involved 20 mathematics teachers from 8 high schools in Aceh Province as participants. Data were obtained from semi-structured interviews and an open-ended questionnaire that was subsequently analysed using the content analysis technique. The results showed that there were three different perspectives on teaching mathematics reading, i.e., important and effective, important but less effective, and important but ineffective. The teachers in the first category tended to use teaching strategies that involved both teachers’ and students’ activities, while they preferred textbooks that provided complete and detailed discussions of contents. The teachers in the second category tended to use strategies that mostly involved teachers’ activities, while they did not show a specific preference for textbook characteristics. The teachers in the last category stated that they had never applied reading mathematics strategies in their classes. They preferred mathematics textbooks that discuss contents briefly and provide many exercises.

Keywords


Reading to learn math, teaching math reading, high school teachers’ perspective, math reading teaching strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, A. E., Pegg, J., & Case, M. (2015). Anticipation guides: Reading for mathematics understanding. The Mathematics Teacher, 108(7), 498–504.

Adams, T. L. (2003). Reading mathematics: More than words can say. The Reading Teacher, 56(8), 786–795.

Barton, M. L., Heidema, C., & Jordan, D. (2002). Teaching Reading in Mathematics and Science. Educational Leadership, 60(3), 24.

Beaudine, G. (2018). From mathematical reading to mathematical literacy. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 23(6), 318–323.

Carter, T. A., & Dean, E. O. (2006). Mathematics intervention for grades 5–11: Teaching mathematics, reading, or both? Reading Psychology, 27(2–3), 127–146.

Ding, H., & Homer, M. (202 C.E.). Interpreting mathematics performance in PISA: Taking account of reading performance—ScienceDirect. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101566.

Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1), 2158244014522633. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633

Guo, J. (2021). The Analysis of the Status Quo and Promotion Strategies of Mathematical Reading of Lower Grade Students. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 10(S1), 24–24.

Laily, I. F. (2014). Hubungan kemampuan membaca pemahaman dengan kemampuan memahami soal cerita matematika sekolah dasar. Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 3(1).

Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography—A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 28–49.

McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78.

Öztürk, M., Akkan, Y., & Kaplan, A. (2020). Reading comprehension, Mathematics self-efficacy perception, and Mathematics attitude as correlates of students’ non-routine Mathematics problem-solving skills in Turkey. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(7), 1042–1058.

Riyadi, M., & Daswa, D. (2018). Pengembangan Anticipation Guides Berdasarkan Framework Membaca Penjelasan dalam Membaca Buku Teks Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika (SNMPM), 2(1), 380–388.

Sukino. (2016). Buku Matematika Wajib SMA/MA Kelas X Semester I. Erlangga.

Wijaya, A., Retnawati, H., Setyaningrum, W., & Aoyama, K. (2019). Diagnosing Students’ Learning Difficulties in the Eyes of Indonesian Mathematics Teachers. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 357–364.

Žakelj, A., Coti?, M., Felda, D., & Mešinovi?, S. (2019). The Importance of Reading Literacy in Learning Mathematics. In J. L. Vodopivec, L. Jan?ec, & T. Štemberger (Eds.), Implicit Pedagogy for Optimized Learning in Contemporary Education (pp. 205–223). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5799-9.ch011

Zulfikar, T. (2010). The making of Indonesian education: An overview on empowering Indonesian teachers. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 2, 13–39.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v15i1.26853

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Institute for Research and Community Services
(LPPM) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

View My Stats