Uncover Student’s Alternative Conception in Acid-Base Theory Using a Modified Certainty of Response Index Instrument
(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Indonesian)References
Artdej, R., et. al. (2010). Thai Grade 11 Students’ Alternative Conceptions for Acid-Base Chemistry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(2), 167—183. Doi: 10.1080/02635141003748382
Effendy. 2002. Upaya untuk Mengatasi Kesalahan Konsep dalam Pengajaran dengan Menggunakan Strategi Konflik Kognitif. Media Komunikasi Kimia, 2 (6): 1-19
Gilbert, J.K., Osborne, R.J., & Fensham, P.J. (1982). Children’s science and it’s consequences for teaching. Journal of Science Education, 66 (4), 623 - 633 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660412
Hakim, A., Liliasari, & Asep K. 2012. Student Concept Understanding of Natural Products Chemistry in Primary and Secondary Metabolites Using the Data Collecting Technique of Modified CRI. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2012, 4 (3), 544-553.
Hinton, M. E., & Nakhleh M.B.( 1999). Students’ Microscopic, Macroscopic, and Symbolic Representations of Chemical Reactions. The Chemical
Educator, 4(4): 158-167. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00897990325a.
Juhji. (2017). Upaya Mengatasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Sistem Saraf Melalui Penggunaan Peta Konsep. Jurnal Formatif, 7(1): 33-39.
Johnstone, A.H. (2000). Teaching of Chemistry – logical or psychological?. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1, 9–15. Doi: 10.1039/A9RP90001B
Kwen, B. H., & Cheng, K. (2005). Using two-tier reflective multiple choice questions to cater to creative thinking. Proceedings of International Education Research Conference National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, BOO05235, 0-10.
Meylindra, I. Suhadi I., dan Oktavia S. 2012. Identifikasi Pemahaman Konsep Larutan Asam Basa Melalui Gambaran Mikroskopik Pada Siswa Kelas Xi Ipa Sma Negeri 5 Malang. Unpublished Thesis. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Monita? F. A., & Suharto, B. (2016). Identifikasi dan analisis miskonsepsi siswa menggunakan three-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument pada konsep kesetimbangan kimia. Quantum, Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 7(1), 27-38.
Ododo, S. O. (2013). Effects of Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Assessment Items on Student’s Learning Outcome in Basic Science Technology (BST). Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(2), 201-210. Doi: 10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n2p201
Oppong, S.H. (2013). The Problem of Sampling in Qualitative Research. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education. 2 (2). 202 – 210
Pabuccu, A. (2008). Improving 11th grade students' understanding of acid-base concepts by using 5E learning cycle model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
Purtadi, S., dan Sari, L.P. 2011. Analisis Miskonsepsi Konsep Laju dan Kesetimbangan Kimia pada Siswa SMA. Makalah. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Sanger, M.J., & Greenbowe, T.J. (1997). Common Student Misconception in Electrochemistry: Galvanic, Electrolytic, and Concentration Cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (JRST), 34 (4), 377-398. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199704)34:4<377::AIDTEA7>3.0.CO; 2-O
Sesen, B.A. & Tarhan, L. (2011). Active-Learning Versus Teacher-Centered Instruction for Learning Acid and Base. Research in Science & Technological Education, Vol. 29(2), 205—226. Doi: 10.1080/02635143.2011.581630
Slavin, R.E.(2011). Psikologi Pendidikan Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.
Sudjana, N. (2005). Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Suparno, P. 2012.Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Treagust, D. F. (2006). Diagnostic Assessment in science as a means to improving teaching, learning, and retention. Proceedings of UniServe Science, Symposium: Assessment in Science Teaching and Learning. Uniserve Science: Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://science.uniserve.edu.au/pubs/procs/2006/treagu st.pdf.
Tsui, C.Y., & Treagust, D. (2010). Evaluating Secondary Students’ Scientific Reasoning in Genetics Using a Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1073-1098
Winny, L., Taufik R., & Ramalis. (2008). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi IPBA di SMA dengan Menggunakan CRI (Certainty of Response Index) dalam Upaya Perbaikan Urutan Pemberian Materi IPBA Pada KTSP. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Penerapan MIPA. Yogyakarta: Fakultas MIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v9i1.2646
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Satya Sadhu
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Publisher: Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. |
![Creative Commons License](https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
View My Stats