Analysis Of Physics Problem Solving In The Perspective Of Self Efficacy and Adversity Quotient

Napis Napis(1*)

(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to determine the effect of self efficacy, and adversity quotient on Physics problem solving. This research is based on the low problem solving of Physics, caused by self-efficacy and adversity quotient. The research used a quantitative approach, survey method with path analysis technique. A sample of 100 students selected at random. The data collection technique used questionnaires to measure self-efficacy, and adversity quotient, while the essay question was used to measure the Physics problem solving on the electric current matter. The result of the path coefficient calculation in the path analysis model is more than 0.05 which means significant. Physics problem-solving path coefficient on self-efficacy 0.222, with contribution 4.92%. Physics problem-solving coefficient on adversity quotient is 0.290 (8.41%). The contribution of self-efficacy to adversity quotient is 7.18% with path coefficient 0.268. The result shows that adversity quotient has a more dominant influence on Physics problem-solving.The results of the study show that: (1) self-efficacy has a positive effect on Physics problem solving, (2) adversity quotient has positive effect on Physics problem solving, (3) self-efficacy has positive effect on adversity quotient, and (4) self-efficacy gives an indirect effect on Physics problem solving through adversity quotient.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Andriana, I dan Leonard. (2016). Pengaruh efikasi diri dan kemandirian belajar terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika. Prosiding Diskusi Panel Pendidikan Matematika, 539-548. Jakarta: Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI.

Astutik, Efi Widiya, Y Bagus Wismanto, dan Haryo Goeritno. (2012). Studi tentang regulasi diri dalam belajar, efikasi diri dan prestasi belajar matematika. Prediksi, Kajian Ilmiah Psikologi. 2 (1): 203:206.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H Freeman and Company.

Baron, R.A. & Donn B. (2004). Psikologi Sosial Jilid 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Dewi, Mulyana dan Huri Suhendri. (2017). Pengaruh kemandirian dan ketahanmalangan (adversity quotient) terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika. Prosiding Diskusi Panel Pendidikan Matematika, 724-735. Jakarta: Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI.

Gerber, Larry. (2015). Problem Solving at School & Work. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc.

Hamalik, Oemar. (2010). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Leman. (2007). The Best of Chinese Life Philosophies. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Leonard, dan Niky Amanah. (2014). Pengaruh adversity quotient dan kemampuan berpikir kritis terhadap prestasi belajar matematika. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(28):55-64.

Mardika, Fitria dan Sri Ulfa Insani. (2017). Adversity Quotient and Students’ Problem Solving Skill in Mathematics. 4th ICRIEMES Proceeding, 211-25. Yogyakarta: The Faculty of Mathematics And Natural Sciences, Yogyakarta State University.

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving Students Skills in Tackling Real-life Problems Vol. V. Franch: OECD Publishing.

Rahmat, Maulidi, Muhardjito, dan Siti Zulaikah. (2014). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah melalui strategi pembelajaran thinking aloud pair problem solving siswa kelas X SMA. Jurnal Fisika Indonesia, 18(54): 108-112.

Riantoni, Cicyn, Lia Yuliati, dan Nandang Mufti. (2017). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah materi listrik dinamis pada pembelajaran guided inquiry berbantuan PhET pada mahasiswa S1 Pendidikan Fisika. JRKPF UAD, 4(1): 40-47.

Saidah, Shofiyatus & Lailatuzzahro Al-Akhda Aulia. (2014). Hubungan self efficacy dengan adversity quotient (AQ). Jurnal Psikologi, 2(2): 54-61.

Savage, Trudi. (2012). Problem Solving Technique. Delhi: Orange Apple.

Stoltz, Paul G. (2005). Adverity quotient mengubah tantangan menjadi peluang. Alih bahasa T. Hermaya. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indoensia.

Suhartono. (2016). Adversity quotient sebagai acuan guru dalam memberikan soal pemecahan masalah matematika. INOVASI, 2(18):62-70.

Sundari, Putri Dwi, Parno, dan Sentot Kusairui. (2016). Hubungan antara Efikasi Diri dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Prosiding Semnas Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM. 405-415. Malang: Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika dan Pasacasarjana UM.

Supardi U.S. (2013). Pengaruh adversity quotient terhadap prestasi belajar matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 3(1): 61-71.

Yoannita, Biola, Esmar Budi, dan Cecep E. R. (2016). Pengaruh Self Efficacy Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Melalui Penggunaan Model Problem Based Learning. Prosiding SNF. Jakarta: Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika FTMIPA Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Yulianawati, Dewi, Hera Novia, Iyon Suyana. (2016). Penerapan Pendekatan Metakognitif Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Siswa Sma Pada Materi Gerak Harmonik Sederhana. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal) SNF2016, 21-15. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Yusuf, Muhammad & Prabowo. (2016). Problem Solving Skill Peserta Didik Pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Prosiding Pertemuan Ilmiah XXX HFI Jateng & DIY, Salatiga, 49-52. Yogyakarta: HFI Jateng dan DIY.

Wena, Made. (2009). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Winarsunu, Tulus. (2009). Statistik dalam Penelitian Psikologi dan Pendidikan. Malang: UMM Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v8i1.2298

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA

Publisher:
Institute for Research and Community Services
(LPPM) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

View My Stats