Analysis of Students' Mathematics Learning Outcomes on Matrix Concepts: A Comparative Study

Anderson Leonardo Palinussa(1*), Jean Limehuwey(2), Carolina Selfiana Ayal(3)

(1) Univeritas Pattimura
(2) Univeritas Pattimura
(3) Univeritas Pattimura
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


21st-century education requires students to be skilled and excel in science, technology, and mathematics, but many countries complain about declining student achievement. Therefore, teachers can apply the right learning strategy to improve student learning outcomes. This study aimed to determine the differences in student learning outcomes taught using the TTW (Think Talk Write) type cooperative learning model and the NHT (Numbered Head Together) learning model on matrix material. The type of this research is experimental research. This research uses a research design, namely The posttest group design. The population in this study were all students of class XI Public Senior High School 19 West Seram, a total of 40 students. The sample in this study used saturated sampling, namely class XI MIA1 with a total of 20 students and class MIA2 with a total of 20 students, so the total sample in this study was 40 students. The instrument used in this study is a test instrument consisting of description questions. The results showed that students' math learning outcomes with the TTW model were superior to those taught with the NHT model. Therefore, the TTW model can be recommended for improving students' mathematics learning outcomes on matrix topics.

Keywords


math learning outcomes, TTW, NHT, matrix

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aguilar, J. J. (2021). High School students’ reasons for disliking mathematics: the intersection between teacher’s role and student’s emotions, belief and self-efficacy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0658. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11294

Agustyaningrum, N., Sari, R. N., Abadi, A. M., & Mahmudi, A. (2020). Dominant Factors that cause students’ difficulties in learning abstract algebra: a case study at a university in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 847–866. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14151A

Asvini, K. D., Suputra, P. E. D., & Hadisaputra, I. N. P. (2020). The effectiveness of the think-talk-write (ttw) strategy on students’ writing skills of the tenth-grade students at SMKN 1 sukasada in the academic year 2019/2020. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 8(1), 21–27. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPBI

Aygör, N., & Burhanzade, H. (2014). The comparative analyzes of the student’s performance about matrix in student selection exam (öss) and the approved lecture books of ministry for the national education (MEB). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.342

Bohol, S. F. T., & Baluyos, G. R. (2023). Teachers’ teaching practices and students’ self-concept in relation to problem-solving performance. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 3(2), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.eduline1674

Capinding, A. T. (2022). Impact of modular distance learning on high school students mathematics motivation, interest/attitude, anxiety and achievement during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 917–934. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.917

Clarke, B., Baker, S., Smolkowski, K., Doabler, C., Strand Cary, M., & Fien, H. (2015). Investigating the efficacy of a core kindergarten mathematics curriculum to improve student mathematics learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2014.980021

Evi Widianingrum, Dewi Netta Febrianti, & Wanabuliandari, S. (2022). Literature review using think talk write (ttw) cooperative learning model in students’ mathematical reasoning ability. Mathematics Education Journal, 6(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v6i2.22678

Ghaith, G. (2001). Learners’ perceptions of their STAD cooperative experience. System, 29(2), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00016-1

Haydon, T., Maheady, L., & Hunter, W. (2010). Effects of numbered heads together on the daily quiz scores and on-task behavior of students with disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19(3), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-010-9108-3

Hunter, W. C., Dieker, L. A., & Whitney, T. (2016). Consultants and co-teachers affecting student outcomes with numbered heads together: keeping all engaged. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 26(2), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2015.1108200

Hunter, W., & Haydon, T. (2013). Examining the effectiveness of numbered heads together for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Beyond Behavior, 22(3), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/107429561302200306

Inganah, S. (2018). Analysis of students understanding for the concept of matrix rank based on APOS theory. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 231, 563–566. https://doi.org/10.2991/amca-18.2018.156

Ismail, S. F. Z. H., Shahrill, M., & Mundia, L. (2015). Factors contributing to effective mathematics teaching in secondary schools in Brunei Darussalam. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.169

James, C., Drake, J. E., & Winner, E. (2018). Expression versus distraction: an investigation of contrasting emotion regulation strategies when drawing, writing, talking, and thinking. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 36(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237417718423

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 25, 85–118. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10180297

Kwon, H. R., & Silva, E. A. (2020). Mapping the landscape of behavioral theories: systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Literature, 35(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219881135

Landrock, U. (2017). Enquête sur les falsifications d’intervieweurs - Un projet quasi-expérimentale. BMS Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/ Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, 136(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106317725640

Larrosa, J. (2010). Endgame: reading, writing, talking (and perhaps thinking) in a faculty of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(5–6), 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00693.x

Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2018). How does realistic mathematics education (RME) improve students’ mathematics cognitive achievement? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 569–578. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/76959

Leasa, M. (2016). The effect of numbered heads together (NHT) cooperative learning model on the cognitive achievement of students with different academic ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 755(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001

Leasa, M., Fenanlampir, A., Batlolona, J. R., & Saimima, A. S. (2021). Problem-solving and creative thinking skills with the PBL model : The concept of the human circulatory system. Biosfer : Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 14(2), 154–166.

Leasa, M., Sanabuky, Y. L., Batlolona, J. R., & Enriquez, J. J. (2019). Jigsaw in teaching circulatory system: a learning activity on elementary science classroom. Biosfer, 12(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v12n2.122-134

Leasa, M., Talakua, M., & Batlolona, J. R. (2016). The development of a thematic module based on Numbered Heads Together (NHT) cooperative learning model for elementary students in Ambon, Moluccas-Indonesia. New Educational Review, 46(4), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2016.46.4.15

Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9

Maheady, L., Mallette, B., Harper, G. F., & Sacca, K. (1991). Heads together: A peer-mediated option for improving the academic achievement of heterogeneous learning groups. Remedial and Special Education, 12(2), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259101200206

Maheady, L., Michielli-Pendl, J., Harper, G. F., & Mallette, B. (2006). The effects of Numbered Heads Together with and without an incentive package on the science test performance of a diverse group of sixth graders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-005-9002-6

Maman, M., & Rajab, A. A. (2016). The implementation of cooperative learning model ‘number heads together (NHT)’ in improving the students’ ability in reading comprehension. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v5i2.4536

Mazana, M. Y., Montero, C. S., & Casmir, R. O. (2020). Assessing students’ performance in mathematics in Tanzania: the teacher’s perspective. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0589. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/7994

Mobrur, A., & Hamed, M. (2014). European Journal of Educational Sciences. Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(4), 190–204.

Muis, A., & Priawasana, E. (2022). The effect of learning the Think Talk Write model with PowerPoint assistance on students’ mathematics learning outcomes. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 5(3), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i3.122

Mutodi, P., & Ngirande, H. (2014). The influence of students’ perceptions on mathematics performance. A case of a selected high school in South Africa. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n3p431

Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006

Öztürk, M., Akkan, Y., & Kaplan, A. (2020). Reading comprehension, Mathematics self-efficacy perception, and Mathematics attitude as correlates of students’ non-routine Mathematics problem-solving skills in Turkey. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(7), 1042–1058. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1648893

Pasani, C. F., & Suryaningsih, Y. (2021). Analysis of students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) ability in matrix subjects. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012039

Randel, B., Apthorp, H., Beesley, A. D., Clark, T. F., & Wang, X. (2016). Impacts of professional development in classroom assessment on teacher and student outcomes. Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.992581

Reyk, J. V., Leasa, M., Talakua, M., & Batlolona, J. R. (2022). Research-based learning: added value in students’ science critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1121

Richgels, D. J. (2013). TALK, W R I T E, AND RE AD. The Reading Teacher, 66(5), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1139

Sarsale, J., Alonzo, D., Caseñas, A., Oo, C. Z., Sy, F. A., & Yepes, P. I. (2024). Assessing literacy practices and futures in science and mathematics classrooms: A systematic review. Issues in Educational Research, 34(2), 719–742.

Schindler, M., & Lilienthal, A. J. (2020). Students’ creative process in mathematics: insights from eye-tracking-stimulated recall interview on students’ work on multiple solution tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8), 1565–1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10033-0

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202

Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative Learning in Teams: State of the Art. Educational Psychologist, 15(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528009529219

Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Education 3-13, 43(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.963370

Slavin, R. E., & Cooper, R. (1999). Improving intergroup relations: Lessons learned from cooperative learning programs. Journal of Social Issues, 55(4), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00140

Supandi, S., Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, R., Suyitno, H., & Dewi, K. (2018). Think-talk-write model for improving students’ abilities in mathematical representation. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1136a

Suwarto, M., Yatimah, D., & Komalasari, G. (2021). The effectiveness of think talk write learning model to the students’ writing skills in Indonesian Elementary School. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(6), 115–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i6.2724

Tatira, B. (2024). Schema development in solving systems of linear equations using the triad framework. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 16(1), 167–189.

Wirda, Setiawan, D., & Hidayat. (2019). The effect of think talk write (ttw) learning method on the creative thinking ability of the students at primary school (Sd) No. 060856 Medan, Indonesia. British Journal of Education, 5(11), 12–28.

Wood, T., Mazzocco, M. M. M., Calhoon, M. B., Crowe, E. C., & Connor, C. M. D. (2020). The effect of peer-assisted mathematics learning opportunities in first-grade classrooms: What works for whom? Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(4), 601–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2020.1772422

Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z. H., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in mathematics learning through Math-Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0100-9




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v15i1.22179

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Institute for Research and Community Services
(LPPM) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

View My Stats