Learning object reusability evaluation on the free national e-learning system

Karin A. Risaf(1*), Rakhmi Khalida(2), Riza Adrianti Supono(3)

(1) Universitas Gunadarma
(2) Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
(3) Universitas Gunadarma
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Kegunaan ulang dianggap sebagai karakteristik penting dari konsep objek pembelajaran sebagai gagasan utama untuk desain konten pembelajaran digital modern, karena fakta bahwa mengembangkan materi pendidikan yang berkualitas memiliki harga mahal dalam hal waktu dan sumber daya, itulah sebabnya mengapa dapat menggunakan kembali materi berkualitas yang sudah ada akan menghasilkan keuntungan pedagogis dan ekonomis. E-Learning standardisasi dan penilaian kesesuaian diharapkan dapat menjadi pilihan bagi mahasiswa, dosen, dan profesional Universitas untuk mempelajari tentang standar dan standardisasi.  Evaluasi dilakukan untuk menentukan apakah objek pembelajaran dalam sistem e-learning dapat digunakan kembali atau tidak berdasarkan metrik kegunaan ulang dengan variabelnya seperti kohesi, kopling, ukuran dan kompleksitas, portabilitas pendidikan dan portabilitas teknis. Variabel-variabel tersebut dihitung dengan metrik berorientasi objek yang telah diimplementasikan ke objek pembelajaran. Implementasi metrik menunjukkan bahwa hasil kohesi dan kopling objek pembelajaran adalah baik dengan ukuran dan portabilitas pendidikan objek pembelajaran dalam tingkat sedang, juga objek pembelajaran portabel secara teknis yang berarti objek pembelajaran sistem e-learning dapat digunakan kembali

Full Text:

PDF

References


S. Sicilia, M. and Sanchez, “Learning object ‘design by contract,’” WSEAS Trans. Syst., vol. 2, pp. 612–617, 2003.

D. Wiley, “Connecting learning objects to instructional theory: A definition, a metaphor and a taxonomy.,” Instr. Use Learn. Objects. Agency Int., 2002.

R. P. Salas, “Reusable Learning Objects: An Agile Approach,” in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2020, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9273947.

A. Bianco, M. De Marsico, and M. Temperini, “Standards for e-Learning,” TISIP Found. Trondheim, Norw., 2005, [Online]. Available: http://www2.tisip.no/quis/public_files/wp5-standards-for-elearning.pdf

S. Downes, “Learning objects: Resources for distance education worldwide.,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., 2001.

M. Amane, M. Gouiouez, and M. Berrada, “Maximizing reusability of learning objects through machine learning techniques,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40174-w.

D. G. Sampson and C. Papanikou, “A Framework for Learning Objects Reusability within Learning Activities,” in 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2009, pp. 32–36. doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2009.120.

C. A. Allen and E. K. Mugisa, “Achieving learning object interoperability and reusability through object orientation,” in 2010 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer, 2010, pp. V2-180-V2-183. doi: 10.1109/ICETC.2010.5529407.

L. Rosenberg, “Applying and interpreting object-oriented metrics.,” Softw. Technol. Conf., 1998.

J. M. et. al. Dodero, “Metrics-based evaluation of learning object reusability.,” Springer Sci. + Bus. Media, LLC., 2010.

S. Yassine, S. Kadry, and M. A. Sicilia, “Learning Analytics and Learning Objects Repositories: Overview and Future Directions,” in Learning, Design, and Technology: An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, J. M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, and M. D. Childress, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 3503–3532. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_13.

L. Currier, S. and Campbell, “Evaluating learning resources for reusability: The dner and learning objects study.,” Proceeding Australas. Soc. Comput. Learn. Tert. Educ. Auckland, New Zealand..

C. Chidamber, S. and Kemerer, “A metrics suite for object oriented design.,” IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 20, no. 6, 1994.

M. Cuadrado, J. and Sicilia, “Learning object reusability metrics: Some ideas from software engineering.,” Int. Conf. Internet Technol. Appl. ITA., 2005.

T. G. S. Filó, M. A. S. Bigonha, and K. A. M. Ferreira, “Evaluating Thresholds for Object-Oriented Software Metrics,” J. Brazilian Comput. Soc., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 313–346, 2024, doi: 10.5753/jbcs.2024.3373.

F. A. Talib, D. Giannacopoulos, and A. Abran, “Designing a Measurement Method for the Portability Non-functional Requirement,” in 2013 Joint Conference of the 23rd International Workshop on Software Measurement and the 8th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement, 2013, pp. 38–43. doi: 10.1109/IWSM-Mensura.2013.16.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/faktorexacta.v17i4.26562

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

template doaj grammarly tools mendeley crossref SINTA sinta faktor exacta   Garuda Garuda Garuda Garuda Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter

site stats View Faktor Exacta Stats


pkp index