Membuka Kemampuan Computational Thinking Sebagai 21 Century Skills Disiplin STEM

Aisyah Husna Alifah(1*), Suprih Widodo(2)

(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Pemikiran komputasional sangat penting untuk keterampilan abad ke-21, melibatkan pemecahan masalah dengan menggunakan konsep ilmu komputer. Hadir dalam lingkup STEM, ini mengembangkan berpikir kritis, kreatif, dan inovatif. Artikel ini mengeksplorasi integrasi pemikiran komputasional dalam pendidikan STEM untuk memupuk keterampilan abad ke-21. Dalam meninjau secara sistematis, penelitian ini menekankan peran krusialnya dalam kehidupan sehari-hari, mendukung keterampilan kritis seperti pemecahan masalah kreatif, yang erat kaitannya dengan keterampilan dasar seperti komunikasi efektif dan literasi digital. Pengembangan keterampilan pemikiran komputasional pada pendidik juga diakui sebagai aspek penting untuk memastikan akses yang adil dalam kurikulum STEM.

Keywords


Education, 21 Century Skills, Computational Thinking, STEM

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bati, K., & ?kbal Yeti?ir, M. (2021). Examination of Turkish Middle School STEM Teachers’ Knowledge about Computational Thinking and Views Regarding Information and Communications Technology. Computers in the Schools, 38(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2021.1882206

Celik, I. (2023). Exploring the Determinants of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy: Digital Divide, Computational Thinking, Cognitive Absorption. Telematics and Informatics, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102026

De Santo, A., Farah, J. C., Martinez, M. L., Moro, A., Bergram, K., Purohit, A. K., Felber, P., Gillet, D., & Holzer, A. (2022). Promoting Computational Thinking Skills in Non-Computer-Science Students: Gamifying Computational Notebooks to Increase Student Engagement. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 15(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3180588

Han, J., Kelley, T., & Knowles, J. G. (2021). Factors Influencing Student STEM Learning: Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy, 21st Century Skills, and Career Awareness. Journal for STEM Education Research, 4(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-021-00053-3

Hou, H. Y., Agrawal, S., & Lee, C. F. (2020). Computational thinking training with technology for non-information undergraduates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100720

John Lemay, D., Basnet, R. B., Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., & Saxena, A. (2021). Instructional interventions for computational thinking: Examining the link between computational thinking and academic performance. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100056

Kong, S. C., & Wang, Y. Q. (2020). Formation of computational identity through computational thinking perspectives development in programming learning: A mediation analysis among primary school students. Computers in Human Behavior, 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106230

Kong, S. C., & Wang, Y. Q. (2021). Item response analysis of computational thinking practices: Test characteristics and students’ learning abilities in visual programming contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106836

Miller, J. (2019). STEM education in the primary years to support mathematical thinking: using coding to identify mathematical structures and patterns. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(6), 915–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01096-y

Nouri, J., Zhang, L., Mannila, L., & Norén, E. (2020). Development of computational thinking, digital competence and 21st century skills when learning programming in K-9. Education Inquiry, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1627844

Ong, S. L., & Ling, J. P. W. (2020). Low-cost educational robotics car promotes STEM learning and 21stcentury skills. Proceedings of 2020 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2020, 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48869.2020.9368487

Rahman, M. A., Zakaria, M. S., & Din, R. (2020). Design STEM Subject Module: A Conceptual Framework. 2020 IEEE Conference on E-Learning, e-Management and e-Services, IC3e 2020, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3e50159.2020.9288391

Sen, C., Ay, Z. S., & Kiray, S. A. (2021). Computational thinking skills of gifted and talented students in integrated STEM activities based on the engineering design process: The case of robotics and 3D robot modeling. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100931

Tekdal, M. (2021). Trends and development in research on computational thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6499–6529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10617-w

Yang, W., Ng, D. T. K., & Gao, H. (2022). Robot programming versus block play in early childhood education: Effects on computational thinking, sequencing ability, and self-regulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1817–1841. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13215




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/fjik.v11i1.21962

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Aisyah Husna Alifah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  Publisher:
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Address: Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. 
Phone: +62 (021) 7818718 – 78835283 | Close in sunday and public holidays in Indonesia
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM
Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm. 
  Creative Commons License
Faktor : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.