Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Interaksi Tes Formatif Uraian dan Kecerdasan Emosional

Supardi U. S. Supardi(1*)

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the results of learning mathematics in terms of the
effect of the interaction between description and formative tests students' emotional intelligence. Research using experimental methods to design a 2x2 factorial treatment by level, and get the results as follows: (1) Overall, the results of the students' mathematics learning structured descriptions given formative tests is higher than that given in descriptions of formative tests are free. (2) There is an interaction effect descriptions and formative tests of emotional intelligence to the results of students' mathematics learning. In the group of students who are given the description of structured formative test results obtained studying mathematics students who have low emotional intelligence is higher than the students who have high emotional intelligence, while in the group of students were given a description of formative tests obtained free math learning outcomes of students who have low emotional intelligence no different from students who have high emotional intelligence. In order to improve the quality of mathematics learning, teachers should be able to conduct a formative test innovation in narrative form. Giving the description formative tests should be tailored to the level of emotional intelligence of students.


Keywords


formative test of structured essay, formative test of free essay, emotional intelligence, mathematic learning outcomes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifin, Zainal. 2009. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arsyad, Azhar. 2007. Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Black, Paul dan Dylan William. 2009. Inside the black box: raising standards through

classroom assessment”. Phi Delta Kappa International Journal, November 1998.

http: //blog. discoveryeducation. com/assessment/files/2009/02/blackbox _article.

pdf (diakses: 19 Januari 2011).

Bloom, Benyamin S, Max D. Englehart, Edward J. Furst, Walker H. Hill, dan David R.

Krathwohl. 2001. Taxonomy of Educational Objective Handbook I: Cognitive

Domain. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.

Cruickshank, Donald R., Deborah Bainer Jenkins, dan Kim K. Metcalf. 2006. The Act of

Teaching. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. 2006. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Fajar, Arnie. 2009. Pembelajaran Portofolio dalam Pembelajaran IPS. Bandung:

Remaja Rosda Karya.

Gardner, Howard. 2003. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences,

terjemahan Lyndon Saputra. Batam: Interaksara.

Given, Barbara K. 2007. Brain-Based Teaching, terjemahan Lala Herawati Dharma.

Bandung: Kaifa.

Goleman, Daniel. 1995. Emotional Intelligence, terjemahan T. Hermaya. Jakarta:Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Gronlund, Norman E. dan Robert L. Linn. 1985. Measurement and Evaluation in

Teaching. New York: Macmillan Publising Company.

Hergenhahn, B. R. dan Mattew H. Olson. 1977. Theories of Learning. New Jersey:

Prentice-Hall Inc.

Hopkins, Charles D. dan Richard L. Antes. 1989. Classroom Testing Construction.

Illinois: F. E. Peacock.

Kirkpatrick, Donald L. dan James D. Kirkpatrick. 2006. Evaluating Training Programs.

San Fransisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.

Mardapi, Djemari. 2008. Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Non-Tes.

Yogyakarta: Mitracendikia.

Munawar, Indra. 2009. Hasil Belajar (Pengertian dan Definisi). Indramunawar

Blogspot. http: //indramunawar. blogspot. com/2009/06/hasil-belajar-pengertiandan-definisi. html (diakses 2 September 2010).

Nasution, MA. 2000. Didaktif Asas-Asas Mengajar. Bandung: Jemmar.

Nitko, Anthony J. 1996. Educational Assessment of Student. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall

Inc

Piaget, Jean. 2002. The Psychology of Intelligence. New York: Published in Routledge

Classics.

Popham, W. James. 1981. Classroom Assessment, What Teacher Need to Know.

Massachussets: A Simon & Schuster Company.

Rasyad, Aminudin. 2003. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: UHAMKA Press

& Yayasan PEP-Ex 8.

Sabri, Ahmad. 2010. Strategi Belajar Mengajar & Micro Teaching. Jakarta: Penerbit

Quantum Teaching.

Sekaran, Uma. 2006. Research Methods for Business buku 2, terjemahan Kwan Men

Yon. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Sholeh, Munawar. 2005. Politik Pendidikan Membangun Sumber Daya Bangsa

dengan Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan. Jakarta: Institute for Public

Education.

Slameto. 2010. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka

Cipta.

Sleeter, Christine E. 2005. Un – Standardizing Curriculum, Multicultural Teaching in

the standars- Based Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

Sudjana, Nana. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja

Rosdakarya.

Suharsono. 2009. Mencerdaskan Anak sejak Dalam Rahim Ibu Hingga Remaja.

Tangerang: Ummah Publishing.

Suryabrata, Sumadi. 2005. Alat Ukur Psikologis. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Suryanto, Adi dan Tedjo Djatmiko. 2009. Evaluasi Pembelajaran di SD. Jakarta:

Universitas Terbuka.

Zainul, Asmawi dan Noehi Nasution. 2005. Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Jakarta: PAU-PPAI

Universitas Terbuka.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v3i2.115

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2013 Jurnal Formatif UNINDRA

Publisher:
Institute for Research and Community Services
(LPPM) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

View My Stats