Measuring the Effectiveness of Process Writing Approach to Improve EFL Students’ Writing Proficiency via Normalized Gain

Yenni Arif Rahman(1*), Fitri Yeni(2), Fitri Apriyanti(3), Fiza Asri Fauziah Habibah(4)

(1) Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
(2) Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
(3) Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
(4) Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The process writing approach introduces structured strategies to enhance students' writing skills through planned and reflective stages. In an educational context, this approach not only facilitates the development of writing skills but also encourages students to become critical and reflective writers. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the process writing approach in enhancing writing proficiency among EFL (English as a Foreign Language) university students, using Normalized Gain (N-Gain) as a measurement tool. The study involved the participation of 17 university students as sample. The methodology utilized calculated N-Gain scores across two cycles of instruction to evaluate students' progress from pre-test to post-test assessments. The results indicate a significant improvement in students' writing abilities following the implementation of the process writing approach. In Cycle 2, N-Gain scores generally fell within the medium category, reflecting consistent progress across the student cohort and surpassing the outcomes observed in Cycle 1. The observed advancements suggest that foundational learning from Cycle 1 contributed to intensified and cumulative gains in Cycle 2. The study underscores the potential universal effectiveness of the process writing approach across varying levels of student comprehension. Future research should delve deeper into the specific teaching materials customized for process writing approach utilized in Cycle 2 to optimize learning outcomes for all students.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Applebee, A. N. (1986). Problems in Process Approaches: Toward a Reconceptualization of Process Instruction. Pp. 95–113 in The teaching of writing. chicago: National Society for the study of Education.

Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A Process Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. ELT Journal 54:153–60.

Brown, H. D. (2021). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd Ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.

Burns, A. (2015). The Cambridge Guide to Research in Language Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Christenson, T. A. (2002). Supporting Struggling Writers in the Elementary Classroom.

Coletta, Vincent P., & Jeffrey J. Steinert. (2020). Why Normalized Gain Should Continue to Be Used in Analyzing Preinstruction and Postinstruction Scores on Concept Inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research 16(1), 10108.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-Engagement versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. Am. J. Phys. 66(64).

Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1992). The Action Research Planner (3rd Ed.). Victorias: Victoria: Deakin University Press.

Kim, YSG. et al. (2021). Writing Instruction Improves Students’ Writing Skills Differentially Depending on Focal Instruction and Children: A Meta-Analysis for Primary Grade Students. Educational Research Review.

Lee, S., & J. Schmidgall. (2020). The Importance of English Writing Skills in the International Workplace. Research Memorandum No. RM-20-07 (October).

Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: A Possible ‘Hidden Variable’ in Diagnostic Pretest Scores. American Journal of Physics 70(12).

Nabhan, S. (2019). Bringing Multiliteracies into Process Writing Approach in ELT Classroom: Implementation and Reflection. Edulite, Journal of English Education 4(2):156–70.

Nagao, A. (2019). “The SFL Genre-Based Approach to Writing in EFL Contexts. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 4(1).

Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teacher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching & Learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Onozawa, Chieko. (2010). A Study of the Process Writing Approach. Gunma University Academic Information Repository (10):153–63.

Oshima, Alice &. Ann Hogue. (2006). Writing Academic English. 4th ed. London: London: Pearson Longman.

Peter Chin, Samuel Reid, Sean Wray, Yoko Yamazaki. (2012). Academic Writing Skills 1 Teacher’s Manual. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Rahman, Yenni Arif et al. (2024). Implementing Process Writing Approach to Improve EFL Students’ Writing Performance in Academic Writing. Innovative Journal 6(1):1–12.

Sadiku, L. M. (2015). The Importance of Four Skills Reading, Speaking, Writing, Listening in a Lesson Hour. European Journal of Language and Literature 1(1):29–31.

Sánchez, Luisa Fernanda, and Margarita Lopez-Pinzon. (2019). The Effect of the Process-Based Approach on the Writing Skills of Bilingual Elementary Students. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning 12(1):72–98.

Tangpermpoon, T. (2008). Integrated Approaches to Improve Students Writing Skills for English Major Students. ABAC Journal 28(2).

Thi, Dang, and Ngoc Anh. (2019). EFL Student’s Writing Skills : Challenges and Remedies. 9(6):74–84.

Tompkins, G. (1994). Teaching Writing: Balancing Process and Product. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Tuan, Luu Trong. (2011). Teaching Writing through Genre-Based Approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 1(11):1471–78.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i1.24410

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 SCOPE : JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING

scope isjd

Portal Garuda Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Web
Analytics
View My Stats

Flag Counter