The Hidden Meaning Construction in Pocut Muhammad Saga

Leni Tiwiyanti(1*), Yulia Sofiana(2), Yosi Maeleona Passandaran(3)

(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(2) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(3) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The researchers would like to research an Acehnese saga or hikayat, titled Pocut Muhammad saga. The representation of power  and social context in the text can be seen by applying Norman Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) method to this story analysis. By using critical discourse analysis developed by Norman Fairlough, the analysis seeks to uncover hidden meanings throughout the story's sentences structure. Since critical discourse analysis by Norman A. Fairclough offers insight into how a text may represent social practice that takes place in society, this theory is decided to be the one that the researchers have chosen. The research method employed is descriptive qualitative, including text analysis technique. Based on the linguistic elements described in this research, the researchers concluded that the structure of the Acehnese language differs significantly from real Indonesian. The second result shows as a leader needs to be someone who can be trusted, who is fair, who values unity and his people above all else, and who never gives up. That is the hidden meaning of this story.


Keywords


Aceh, Saga, Pocut Muhammad, Critical discourse and Text

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badara, A. (2014). Analisis wacana: Teori, metode, dan penerapannya pada wacana media. Prenada Media.

Chaer, A. (2014). Linguistik umum.

Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (2021). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh university press.

Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2013). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Routledge.

Fauzan, U. (2013). Analisis wacana kritis model Fairclough. Jurnal Pendidik, 5(2), 1–10.

Halik, A. (2018). Paradigma kritik penelitian komunikasi (pendekatan kritis-emansipatoris dan metode etnografi kritis). Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, 19(2), 162–178.

Haryatmoko, D. (2016). Critical discourse analysis (Analisis wacana kritis): Landasan teori, metodologi, dan penerapan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Hauser, B., Rigg, C., Trehan, K., & Vince, R. (2023). How to facilitate critical action learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 20(2), 116–131.

Herman, R. N., Mukhlis, M., Parlindungan, F., Lisyati, L., & Nuthihar, R. (2020). Character education in an Acehnese cultural saga: Hikayat Prang Sabi. Lingua Cultura, 14(2), 179–186.

Hibtiyah, M. (2022). Dimensi Sosial Dalam Cerpen Amnesti Karya Putu Wijaya (Prespektif Analisis Wacana Kritis Norman Fairclough). Jurnal BASINDO, 6(1).

Saifudin, A. (2019). Teori tindak tutur dalam studi linguistik pragmatik. Lite: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 15(1), 1–16.

Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Classifying the Findings in Qualitative Studies. Sage Journals, 13(7)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i1.24300

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 SCOPE : JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING

scope isjd

Portal Garuda Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Web
Analytics
View My Stats

Flag Counter