The Representation of Taboos in Proverbs: An Anthropological and Functional Perspective

Marsandi Manar(1*)

(1) Universitas Bangka Belitung
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Until now, taboo in culture to some extents has represented inherited moral values that can be applied to the modern context. Nevertheless, among existing  studies that have investigated this phenomenon, none has applied Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) as the framework and none has made use of Bangkanese proverb as the data. Thus, the purpose of this study is to reveal the representation of taboos in Bangkanese Malay proverbs based on the anthropological perspective and based on SFL framework. To obtain the purpose, this study applied qualitative approach with questionnaire as well as interview as the data collection techniques and transitivity system as the analysis framework.  Seventy responses via qualitative questionnaires were successfully gathered and five informants were interviewed to collect the taboo expressions. The obtained taboo expressions were analyzed with Hallidayan transitivity system. The findings reveal that taboos in Bangkanese proverbs cover action alone as well as both action and expression. Further, most experiences in the taboo proverbs are represented in material processes followed with one relational and one verbal process. The major occurrences of material processes are believed to achieve the embedded values brought by the taboo proverbs since the processes of actions represent concrete meanings.

Keywords


Taboos; Proverbs; Bangkanese; Anthropolinguistic; SFL

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdi, H. (2020). Macam-macam suku di Indonesia dan daerahnya berdasarkan pulau. Liputan 6. https://hot.liputan6.com/read/4194711/macam-macam-suku-di-indonesia-dan-daerahnya-berdasarkan-pulau.

Abi-Esber, F., Yang, P., Muranaka, H., & Moustakim, M. (2018). Linguistic taboos: A case study on Australian Lebanese speakers. Asian Culture and History, 10(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v10n1p89

Akporobara, F. B. (2006). Introduction to African oral literature. Princeton Publishing Company.

Al Fajri, M. S. (2018). The representation of a blasphemy protest in Jakarta in local and international press. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 705–713. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9821

Alhussaini, H., Pandian, A., & Al-shaibani, G. K. S. (2016). A functional linguistic analysis of the incest taboo relationships in the holy Quran. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(4), 175–195.

Bakhtiar, M. (2011). Assessing the offensiveness level of taboo words in Persian. The Journal of International Social Research, 4(19), 15–23.

Burridge, K., & Allan, K. (2006). Forbidden words. Cambridge University Press.

Chu, M. (2009). Chinese cultural taboos that affect their language & behavior choices. Asian Culture and History, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v1n2p122

Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge University Press.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum International Publishing Group.

Finnegan, R. (1970). Oral literature in Africa. Oxford University Press.

Freud, S. (2001). Totem and Taboo. Routledge.

Gao, C. (2013). A sociolinguistic study of English taboo language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(12), 2310–2314. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.12.2310-2314

Gay, M., & Susanti, P. A. (2017). Taboo language within Ternate society: A study on its formation and reference. Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture, 1(1), 170–183. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um006v1i12017p170

Gou, E., & Zhang, D. (2017). Hybridity in systemic functional linguistics: Grammar, text and discursive context. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 39(1), 139–142. https://doi.org/https://www.tand10.1080/07268602.2017.1282796.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Hodder Headline Group.

He, H. (2019). Past achievements and future possiblities of systemic-functional discourse/text analysis: In memory of M. A. K. Halliday. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 7(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190701.15

Hendrik, M. (2018). Kajian etnosemantik: Kesepadanan makna peribahasa bersumber nama binatang dalam Bahasa Indonesia dan bahasa daerah. Dialektika, 5(2), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.15408/dialektika.v5i2.7103

Humaeni, A. (2015). Tabu perempuan dalam budaya masyarakat banten. HUMANIORA, 27(2), 174-185. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.10585

Isnendes, R. (2014). Estetika Sunda sebagai bentuk kearifan lokal masyarakat Sunda tradisional dalam sawangan pendidikan karakter. Edusentris, Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 1(2), 194-206. http://jurnal.upi.edu/3491/view/3357

Juansah, D. E. (2019). Expression of prohibition as a representation of taboo in Baduy society. LITERA, 18(1), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v18i1.21066

Kondowe, W. (2014). Presidents and ideologies: A transitivity analysis of Binguwa Mutharika’s inaugural address. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.16

Kosha, M., & Shams, M. R. (2005). A critical study of news discourse: Iran’s nuclear issue in British newspapers. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 107–142.

Manar, M. (2022). Hybridity across linguistic studies. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 5(2), 281–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v5i2.2028

Manar, M. (2016). Wars of media: The transitivity system of fraud-case headlines addressing an Indonesian media-owner politician. The 43rd International Systemic Functional Congress, 117–119.

Manar, M., & Purwaningrum, P. W. (2021). The students’ language attitudes towards lecturers’ code mixing: An SFL study. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(2), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i2.1133

Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Painter, C. (1997). Working with functional grammar. Arnold.

Mondolalo, D. (2015). Kajian hermeneutik nilai-nilai kearifan lokal kata-kata falia (tabu) masyarakat Muna. 1(2), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.17509/rb.v1i2.8759

Pilotti, M., Almand, J., Salif, M., & Martinez, M. (2012). Taboo words in expressive anguage : Do sex and primary language matter ? American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(2), 17–26.

Reath. (1998). The language of newspapers. Routledge.

Robati, N. F. Z., & Zand, F. (2018). Translation of taboos: The absolutely true diary of a part-time Indian. International Journal of

Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.35

Russmann, H. (2000). Routledge Dictionary of language and linguistics. Routledge Press.

Shokouhi, H., & Amin, F. (2010). A systemist ‘verb transitivity’ analysis of the Persian and English newspaper editorials: A focus of genre familiarity on EFL learner’s reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(4), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.4.387-396

Suliadi, Laksana, I. K. D., & Simpen, I. W. (2019). Pemaliq words of human death within the society of Sasak-Indonesia : A linguistic anthropology study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(5), 1125–1129. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1005.28

Wardhaugh, R. (2000). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Yusuf, Y. Q., & Yusuf, Q. (2014). Contemporary Acehnese cultural prohibitions and the practice of mystical threats. Kemanusiaan, 21(2), 21–53.

Zou, H. (2018). On linguistic philosophy of Mikhail Bakhtin and Hallidayan Systemic Functional Linguistics. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 367–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0902.19




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v8i2.20549

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 SCOPE : JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

scope isjd

Portal Garuda Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Web
Analytics
View My Stats

Flag Counter