Variation Language Content Analysis Book (A Need Analysis Study)

Eva Nurul Chandra(1*), Wiwik Yully Widyawati(2)

(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(2) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research aims to analyse whether the “Contrastive Linguistic and Error Analysis Book” is considered relevant to the SDGs criteria. The success of the English teaching learning process will also be encouraged by the application of instructional material. Most language programs rely heavily on teaching materials. Created material is one of the materials in a university.  In this research, the writers used qualitative descriptive method. Then, the students who learned Contrastive Linguistics and Error Analysis (CLEA) and the lecturers who have taught CLEA were chosen to be the participants. The instruments used in this research were questionnaires both from student’s perspective and lecturer’s perspective. Student’s questionnaire consisted of 20 questions, and lecturer’s questionnaire consisted of 12 questions. The data collection was taken from 55 students and 8 lecturers who were given the questionnaire. Based on the results and discussion, it shows that dimension of “suit environment” from the lecturer’s perception, that the text in CLEA book is no longer suitable for this global era. Considering with Sustainable Development Goals, the CLEA textbook syllabus needs a revisiting to insert the SDGs theme in its reading text that is related with the 17 goals, such as: quality education, no poverty, zero hunger, gender equality, climate action, and many more. Since syllabus is guidance in achieving the learning objectives, it needs revisiting gradually to pursue the developing situation. The revisiting syllabus should consider both student and teacher as the practitioners of teaching and learning process. Hopefully by inserting the SDGs theme in the CLEA syllabus, student and teacher can be engaged together in creating a better life in the community.


Keywords


A Need Analysis; Contrastive Linguistic; Textbook

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, M. M. (2012). Revisiting English Language Teaching (ELT) curriculum design: How appropriate is Bangladesh higher secondary level national ELT Curriculum as a learner-centred one? IIUC Studies, 7(November 2012), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.3329/iiucs.v7i0.12494

Crawford, J. (2011). The Role of Materials in the Language Classroom: Finding the Balance. In Methodology in Language Teaching (pp. 80–92). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667190.013

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Dehnad, A., Bagherzadeh, R., Bigdeli, S., Hatami, K., & Hosseini, F. (2010). Syllabus revision: A needs analysis study. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.325

Levin, A. (2022). Language Variation. Retrieved from https://www.languageavenue.com/linguistics/sociolinguistics/language-variation/language-variation

Maley, A., & Peachey, N. J. P., & T. W. (2017). Integrating global issues in the creative English language classroom: With reference to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1652023

Miranda, M. B., & Del Campo, R. M. (2016). A theoretical-practical view over the way textbooks are used in the training of English teachers. Revista Linhas, 17(35), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.5965/1984723817352016301

Mohamed, M. (2013). Developing an English language textbook evaluative checklist. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 1(3), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0135570

Muff, K., Kapalka, A., & Dyllick, T. (2017). The gap frame - translating the SDGs into relevant national grand challenges for strategic business opportunities. International Journal of Management Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.004

Nation, I. S. ., & Macalister, J. (2015). Approaches to Curriculum Design. In Language Curriculum Design.

Palmer, M. S., Wheeler, L. B., & Aneece, I. (2016). Does the Document Matter? The Evolving Role of Syllabi in Higher Education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2016.1198186

United Nations. (2015). A/RES/70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Preamble. United Nations General Assembly Resolution.

Woods, A., Luke, A., & Weir, K. (2016). Curriculum and Syllabus Design. In International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 362–367). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00058-0.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v8i1.16683

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Eva Nurul Chandra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

scope isjd

Portal Garuda Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Web
Analytics
View My Stats

Flag Counter