PENGARUH FIRM MATURITY DAN SLACK RESOURCES TERHADAP PENGUNGKAPAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Rita Sugiarti

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membuktikan secara empiris pengaruh firm maturity dan slack resources terhadap Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Hipotesis penelitian dibangun berdasarkan teori legitimasi, teori stakeholder, dan resources-based view. Teknik pemilihan sampel menggunakan purposive sampling. Sebanyak 53 perusahaan digunakan sebagai sampel dengan 3 tahun penelitian, sehingga jumlah observasi adalah sebanyak 159 observasi. Data penelitian merupakan data sekunder yang berasal dari laporan keuangan perusahaan go public. Data CSR diperoleh dengan mengolah laporan CSR perusahaan menggunakan software NVIVO versi 10, sedangkan untuk data-data lainnya yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini diakses dari datastream. Pengolahan data penelitian menggunakan software STATA versi 13 dengan melakukan uji statistik deskriptif dan uji regresi berganda dengan balanced data panel untuk membuktikan hipotesis penelitian. Hasil penelitian membuktikan bahwa firm maturity berpengaruh positif terhadap pengungkapan CSR. Sedangkan slack resources tidak berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan CSR. Hasil penelitian ini dapat digunakan sebagai bahan pertimbangan bagi pembaca laporan keuangan perusahaan terutama investor yang concern terhadap isu-isu lingkungan di Indonesia. Perusahaan mature lebih banyak mengungkapkan CSR dibandingkan perusahaan younger sehingga para investor dapat mempertimbangkan perusahaan mature ketika akan menanamkan modal.


Keywords


Firm Maturity, Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility, Slack Resources

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


Abeysekera, I. (2013). A template for integrated reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931311323869

Anggraeni, D. Y., & Djakman, C. D. (2017). SLACK RESOURCES, FEMINISME DEWAN, DAN KUALITAS PENGUNGKAPAN TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL PERUSAHAAN. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2017.06

Arora, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (2011). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR): The moderating roles of attainment discrepancy and organization slack. Corporate Governance, 19(2), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00843.x

Artiach, T., Lee, D., Nelson, D., & Walker, J. (2010). The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Accounting and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00315.x

Attig, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Suh, J. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Credit Ratings. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1714-2

Benlemlih, M. (2014). Why do socially responsible firms pay more dividends?

Cormier, D., Ledoux, M. J., & Magnan, M. (2011). The informational contribution of social and environmental disclosures for investors. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111163124

Dickinson, V. (2011). Cash flow patterns as a proxy for the firm life cycle. Accounting Review, 86(6), 1969–1994. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10130

El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007

Fatima, A. H., Abdullah, N., & Sulaiman, M. (2015). Environmental disclosure quality: examining the impact of the stock exchange of Malaysia’s listing requirements. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 904–922. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2014-0041

Guenster, N., Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Koedijk, K. (2011). The Economic Value of Corporate Eco-Efficiency. European Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2009.00532.x

Gunawan, J. (2010). Perception of important information incorporates social disclosures: evidence from Indonesia. Social Responsibility Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111011024559

Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 59, pp. 5–21). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005

Harrison, J. S., & Coombs, J. E. (2012). The Moderating Effects from Corporate Governance Characteristics on the Relationship Between Available Slack and Community-Based Firm Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1046-z

Hasan, M. M., & Habib, A. (2017). Corporate life cycle, organizational financial resources, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 13(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2017.01.002

Luo, L., Tang, Q., & Lan, Y. (2013). Comparison of the propensity for carbon disclosure between developing and developed countries. Accounting Research Journal, 26(1), 6–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-04-2012-0024

Merrill, N. (2010). Doing Good in Society: A comparative study of the communication of the ethical aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility in Germany and the US.

Nielsen. (2014). Doing Well by Doing Good. Nielson.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 47 Tahun 2012 Tentang Tanggung Jawab Sosial Dan Lingkungan Perseroan Terbatas. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Prasetya, E. (2018). Menguak Problematika CSR di Indonesia. https://ksm.ui.ac.id/menguak-problematika-csr-di-indonesia/

Putri, S. A., Darmayanti, Y., & Fauziati, P. (2019). Pengaruh Slack Resources, Feminisme Dewan, Manajemen Laba, Dan Kapitalisasi Pasar Terhadap Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility. Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Bung Hatta, 14(1). https://ejurnal.bunghatta.ac.id/?journal=JFEK&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=14513

Rakotomavo, M. T. J. (2012). Corporate investment in social responsibility versus dividends? In Social Responsibility Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111211234833

Sayekti, Y. (2011). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility CSR: Slack Resources, Kinerja Keuangan, dan Earnings Response Coefficient. Universitas Indonesia.

Trihermanto, F., & Nainggolan, Y. A. (2018). Corporate life cycle, CSR, and dividend policy: empirical evidence of Indonesian listed firms. Social Responsibility Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2017-0186

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007. (2007). Undang-Undang Republik Perseroan Terbatas. www.hukumonline.com

Vanacker, T., Collewaert, V., & Zahra, S. A. (2017). Slack resources, firm performance, and the institutional context: Evidence from privately held European firms. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2583

Velte, P., & Stawinoga, M. (2016). Integrated reporting: The current state of empirical research, limitations, and future research implications. Journal of Management Control, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-016-0235-4

Withisuphakorn, P., & Jiraporn, P. (2016). The effect of firm maturity on corporate social responsibility (CSR): do older firms invest more in CSR? Applied Economics Letters, 23(4), 298–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1071464

Xu, E., Yang, H., Quan, J. M., & Lu, Y. (2015). Organizational slack and corporate social performance: Empirical evidence from China’s public firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9401-0

Yusuf, Y. Y. (2017). Determinan Pengungkapan Csr Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen. https://doi.org/10.26905/jbm.v4i2.1701




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/jabe.v7i1.5373

Article metrics

Abstract views : 43 | Full Text views : 60

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Alamat:Kampus B | Jl. Raya Kampung Gedong
Phone: +62 (021) 7818718 – 78835283
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM



Creative Commons License

JABE (Journal of Applied Business and Economic) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.