Penerapan Constructive Controversy dan Modified Free Inquiry Terhadap HOTS Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi

Rosa Dewi Pratiwi(1*)

(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The aims of this study was to determine the effect of the using Constructive
Controversy (CC) and Modified Free Inquiry (MFI) Method, analytical skill, and it’s interaction toward biology students’ cognitive learning achievement and HOTS. The method used in the research was experimental method and it was conducted from November 2013 to January 2014. The population was the biology students in UNINDRA. The sample was consisted of three class R3A, R3B and R3C. The learning method applied to R3A was MFI, R3B was control and to R3C was CC. The data was collected through students’ cognitive learning achievement test, analytical skills test, HOTS test, and supported by questioner for measuring affective achievements and observation sheet for assessing psychomotor. The hypothesis was tested using parametric statistic. The finding showed that: 1) There was significant difference from the results of two compared learning methods towards students’ cognitive learning achievement and HOTS, 2) Analytical skills affected students’ cognitive learning achievement and HOTS, 3) There was interaction between learning method and analytical skills toward student s’ cognitive learning achievement and HOTS.


Keywords


Constructive Controversy, Modified Free Inquiry, HOTS.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Facione, Peter A. 2011. Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. California:California Academic Press.

Bayram, Hale and Comek,Arif. 2009. Examining The Relation Between Science Attitude, Logical Thinking Ability, Information Literacy and Academic Achievement Through Internet Assisted Chemistry Education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science. www. sciencedirect.com. Diakses tanggal 28 April 2014.

Kemendiknas. Undang-Undang Standar Pendidikan Nasional No. 20 Tahun 2003.Jakarta.

King, FJ, Goodson Ludwika, and Rohani Faranak. 2004. Higher Order Thinking Skill. http: //www. Cala. Fsu. Edu.Diakses tanggal 28 April 2014.

Lawson, Anton E. 1993. Inductive-deductive versus hypothetico-deductive reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30 (6), 613-614.

Sara, B Marcketti. 2007. Optimal Learning. College Students Journal Publisher: Project Inovation Alabama. ISSN: 0146-3934. Volume 41 Isuue: 4. Diakses tanggal 2 Mei 2014.

Khan,M. Saeed, Shaukat Hussain, Riasat Ali, M. Iqbal Majoka, and Muhammad Ramzan. 2011. Effect of inquiry method on achievement of students in chemistry at secondary level. International Journal of Academic Research. 3 (1). Part III.

Diakses tanggal 4 Mei 2014.

Sudjana, Nana. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pienta, Nobert J, Copper, Melanie M, and Greenbowe, Thomas J. 2005. Chemists’ Guide Effective Teaching. USA: Pearson Prentice Hill.

Oscarson and Oseberg. 2010. The Invention Effect of Using WebQuest on Logical Thinking Ability in Science Education. Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science. www. sciencedirect.com.

Santoso,Singgih. 2010. Statistik Multivariat (Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan SPSS). akarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Slameto. 2010. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Tjosvold Dean. 1983. Learning to Make Decisions Through Constructive Controversy.

Canada: American Educational Research Assosiation. Valerie Wilson. 2000. Can thinking Skill Be taugh? Dublin: Scottish Council For Research in Education. http: //www. scre.ac.uk. Diakses tanggal 16 Juni 2014.

Winkel. 2007. Psikologi Pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Media Abadi.

QingZhou, Guo Jing and Wang Yan. 2010. Promoting Preservise Teachers’ Critical Thinking Skills By Inquiry-Based Chemical Experiment. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science. www. sciencedirect.com. Diakses tanggal 4 Maret 2014.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v4i2.144

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA

Publisher:
Institute for Research and Community Services
(LPPM) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

View My Stats