The Skill Profile of Pre-Service Science Teachers In Writing Strem-Based (Science-Technology-Religion-Engineering-Mathematics) Science Teaching Materials

Wahyuni Handayani(1*), Tri Wahyu Agustina(2), Muhammad Ghilman Firdaus(3)

(1) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
(2) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
(3) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to identify the profile of STREM-based science writing skills in pre-service science teachers. The study was done using a descriptive method through a study of STREM-based science teaching materials documentation written by the pre-service science teachers. The target population is the seventh-semester students. Fifty people who are enrolled in the elective course of Integrated Science Learning were selected through Purposive Sampling. Performance assessment of the STREM-based science teaching materials was done using an analytical rubric with a score of 1-4 on the aspect of pedagogic, content, and context. Determination of inter-rater reliability was taken from 25 random samples of teaching materials and correlated their scores using Pearson's correlation. The inter-rater reliability score obtained is 0.938 in all aspects of teaching materials; 0.690 in the pedagogic aspect; 0.976 in the aspect of content; and 0.921 in the context aspect. The score of the teaching materials is then converted in the form of a percentage and interpreted based on certain criteria. The average score of pre-service science teachers' writing skills was 53.3% in the "good" criteria. The writing quality of teaching materials has not yet met the expected criteria from the pedagogic, content, and context aspects. Thus, it is important to develop appropriate learning strategies to improve the writing skills of STREM-based science teaching materials for pre-service science teachers.

Keywords


Writing Skills, STREM, Teaching Materials, Preservice Science Teacher

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183–198.

Agustina, T.W., Rustaman, N.Y., Riandi, & Purwianingsih W. (2018b). Plant Physiology with Mathematic and Art Religion Engineering Science and Technology Approach. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 261: 43-47. DOI: 10.2991/icie-18. 2018.

Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (eds.) (2010). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing : A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objektive- A Briged Edition. New York : Longman.

BSNP. (2006). Permendiknas RI No. 22 Tahun 2006

BSNP. (2014). Instrumen penilaian buku teks pelajaran tahun 2014. Retrieved July 6, 2017, from http://bsnp-indonesia.org/category/evaluasi-buku/

Bybee, R.W. (2010). Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70 (1), 30-35.

Ceylan, S., & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Improving a Sample Lesson Plan for Secondary Science Courses within the STEM Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 223 -228.

Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2010). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools: Developing fundamental knowledge and skills. New York: Allyn & Bacon

Creswell, John W. (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research 4th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar.

diSessa, A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293–331

Eilam, B. (2012a). Teaching, learning, and visual literacy: The dual role of visual representation in the teaching profession. New York: Cambridge University Press

Erwin, E., Rustaman, N.Y., Firman, H. & Ramalis, T.R. (2019). Profile of the Prosective Teacher Response to the Development of Scientific Communication Skills Through Physics Learning. Jounal of Physics Conference Series. 1157, 032040

Evens, M., Elen, J., Larmuseau, C., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Promoting the development of teacher professional knowledge: Integrating content and pedagogy in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 244-258.

Fensham, P. J. (2009) Real world contexts in PISA science : implications for context-based science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), pp. 884-896.

Gunstone, R., McKittrick, B., and Mulhall, P., (2005). “Textbooks And Their Authors: Another Perspective On The Difficulties Of Teaching and Learning Electricity”. Dalam K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. de Jong (Ed). Research and the Quality of Science Education, Netherlands: Springer

Jamilah, J., Najib, A. A., Dzulkhairi, M., Ariff, H., & Ismail, N. N. (2014). Integration of Islamic input in medical curriculum – Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) Experience. The International Medical Journal of Malaysia, 13(2), 73–77

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (2013). Kurikulum 2013 Kompetensi Dasar Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP)/ Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTS). Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kementrian Pendidikan & Kebudayaan (2017). Model Silabus Mata Pelajaran Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah (SMP/MTs) Mata Pelajaran IPA. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan & Kebudayaan.

McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 53–78

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 6 Tahun 2007.

OECD. (2006). Assesing Scientific, Reading, and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD

Permendikbud. (2018). Peraturan Mentri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Mentri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.

Prastowo. (2012). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Jogjakarta: Diva Press

Poedjiadi, A. (2005). Pendidikan Sains dan Moral Bangsa. Bandung: Yayasan Cendrawasih.

Setiawan, N., Sutrisno, S., Munzil, M., & Danar, D. (2020). Pengenalan STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) dan Pengembangan Rancangan Pembelajarannya untuk Merintis Pembelajaran Kimia dengan Sistem SKS di Kota Madiun. Lumbung Inovasi: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 56-64.

Sinaga,P., Suhandi,A & Liliasari, (2014) Improving the Ability of Writing Teaching Materials and Self-Regulation of Pre-Service Physics Teachers through Representational Approach. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 15 (1) : 80-94.

Siregar, N. (1998). Penelitian Kelas: Teori, Metodologi, dan Analisis. Bandung: IKIP Bandung Press

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1e22.

Widodo, A. (2021). Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Dasar-dasar Untuk Praktik. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indoensia Press.

Yanuar, Y. (2018). Miniatur Rumah Hemat Energi. Bandung: SEAMEO QITEP In Sciense.

Yudianto, S.A. (2005). Manajemen Alam (Sains) Sumber Pendidikan Nilai. Bandung: Mughni Sejahtera.

Zainul, A. (2001). Alternative Assesment. Universitas Terbuka: Jakarta.

Zarman, W. (2020). Pendidikan IPA Berlandaskan Nilai Keimanan: Konsep dan Model Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Deepublish




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v12i2.12020

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Institute for Research and Community Services
(LPPM) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

View My Stats