Pengaruh Metode Belajar dan Tingkat Penalaran Formal terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa

Maria Dewati(1*)

(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the method of learning
the physics student learning outcomes, to determine the effect of the level of formal reasoning students' physics student learning outcomes, and to determine the effect of the interaction methods of learning and level of formal reasoning. The method used is the method exsperimen. Samples were taken by 30 students to 15 students in the control class and 15 students of class exsperimen, and simple random technique. The data was collected by distributing directly to the sample test. Data analysis using descriptive statistics such as finding the mean, median, mode, standard deviation, and inferential statistics is to find the coefficients. The results showed: 1) a positive effect on learning outcomes approach to learning physics students with Fcount (43.199)> F table (4.02). 2)
There was a positive influence on students' level of formal reasoning physics student learning outcomes Fcount (10.746)> TTable (4.02). 3). The interaction method of learning with students' level of formal reasoning with the Fcount (8694)> F table (4.02). 4) There is an average difference between the learning outcomes approach to learning (inquery and conventional) with t0 = 5.585 and sig = 0.000 <0.05. 5) There is an average difference between the levels of learning outcomes of formal reasoning (High and Low) with t0 = 2.291 and sig = 0.026 <0.05.


Keywords


method of learning, the level of formal reasoning, learning outcomes, physics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dahar, R.W. 1989. Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Dantes, N. 1986. Analisis Varians. Singaraja: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan FKIP Unud.

Depdiknas. 2001. Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran Fisika untuk

SMK.

Hamalik, Oemar. 1994. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Harlen, W. 1992. The Teaching of Science. London: David Fulton Publisher.

Klausmeier, Herbert J. dan Goodwin, William. 1971. Learning and Human Abilities

Educational Pdichology. New York: Harper & Raw.

Prasetyo, Zuhdan K, dkk. 2006. Kapita Selekta Pembelajaran Fisika. Jakarta: UT

Press.

Rojakkers. Ad. 1989. Mengajar Dengan Sukses. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.

Sanjaya, Wina. 2007. Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Stanley, J. Ahmand and Grock, Marrin D. 1971. Measuring and Evaluating

Educational Achievement. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Inc.

Suparno, Paul. Kajian Kurikulum Fisika SMA/MA berdasarkan KTSP. Yogyakarta:

Surya, Yohanes. 1997. Olimpiade Fisika. Jakarta: Primatika Cipta Ilmu.

Suryabrata, Sumadi. 1985. Proses Belajar Mengajar di Perguruan Tinggi. Yogyakarta:

Andi Offset.

Syah, Muhibin. 2005. Psikologi Pendidikan; Suatu Pendekatan Baru. Bandung,

Remaja Rasdakarya.

Usman, Moh. Uzer. 1989. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wosparik, Hans Jacobus. 2005. Dari Atomos Hingga Quark. Jakarta: Kutubuku.com

Kepustakaan




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v2i3.103

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2012 Formatif : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA

Publisher:
Institute for Research and Community Services
(LPPM) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

View My Stats