OPTIMIZATION OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY PERFORMANCE AND SPACE COMFORT IN COWORKING SPACE BUILDING, CASE STUDY: RELATIONSHIP OF COWORKING SPACE AND CAFE
(1) Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana
(2) Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
After the COVID-19 pandemic, people began to embrace flexible working and coworking space became one of the comfortable work spaces. The culture of "work from anywhere" has begun to be commonly applied in various business sectors. The comfort of coworking space has an impact on the need for high energy consumption. This study aims to evaluate the performance of coworking space buildings in terms of energy efficiency and user comfort. The method used is a quantitative method with mathematical calculation analysis and also software simulation. The research focuses on optimizing energy efficiency through the performance of the building envelope, then the parameters used are OTTV to show the level of heat conduction, IKE as the overall level of energy consumption, and spatial comfort in the visual aspect. The results of the existing evaluation show a fairly high energy consumption of 230 kWh / m2 / year. Several design strategies in an effort to improve the energy efficiency performance of buildings include modifying building envelope materials with low thermal conductivity (u-value) characteristics, as well as providing alternative shading designs for buildings to be able to reduce incoming heat more optimally. Simulations show that the recommended design strategy can reduce OTTV value by up to 50% and IKE value to 173 kWh/m2/year. Thus, energy efficiency strategies with low u-value materials (reflective exterior layers, low-e glass with air gaps and green roofs) for building envelopes and passive design through shading device design interventions are considered effective in supporting the needs of coworking space comfort standards.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Indonesian)References
Annisa, S. (2021). The Effect of Office Comfort on Employees Work Productivity.
Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2011). Konservasi energi selubung bangunan pada bangunan gedung Badan Standardisasi Nasional. www.bsn.go.id
coworking insights. (2020). 2020 FUTURE OF WORK REPORT.
Databooks, & Kusnandar, V. B. (2021). sebanyak-69-penduduk-yogyakarta-berusia-produktif. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/12/28/sebanyak-69-penduduk-yogyakarta-berusia-produktif
el Samara. (2022). Perkembangan Co-working Space di Indonesia. Https://Elsamara.Id/Perkembangan-Co-Working-Space-Di-Indonesia-Apa-Manfaatnya/.
Handayani, T. (2010). EFISIENSI ENERGI DALAM RANCANGAN BANGUNAN Energy Efficiency in Building Design (Vol. 1, Issue 2).
Hudedmani, M. G., Kataraki, R., Jocy, R., Vaddatti, S., & Maliyavar, M. (2018). Energy Conservation in Office Environment. International Journal of Advanced Science and Engineering, 5(1), 833. https://doi.org/10.29294/ijase.5.1.2018.833-839
International Finance Corporation. (2015). ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, AND SAFETY GUIDELINES FOR WIND ENERGY. www.ifc.org/ehsguidelines.
Kementrian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. (2012). Energy Efficiency and Conservation Clearing House Indonesia.
Manullang, A. L. E. (2015). Evaluasi Pencahayaan Kebisingan Temperatur, dan Getaran pada Line 3 PT. South Pasific Visvoce. Industrial Engineering Online Journal, 4 No. 3.
Menteri Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. (2006). Pedoman Pelaksanaan Konservas Energi dan Pengawasan di Lingkungan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia.
Mentri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2002). KEPUTUSAN MENTERI KESEHATAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 1405/MENKES/SK/XI/2002.
Octarino, C. N., & Feriadi, H. (2021). EVALUASI KINERJA SELUBUNG BANGUNAN GEDUNG AGAPE UNIVERSITAS KRISTEN DUTA WACANA YOGYAKARTA. LANGKAU BETANG: JURNAL ARSITEKTUR, 8(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.26418/lantang.v8i2.45436
PUG PUPR. (2002). UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2002 TENTANG BANGUNAN GEDUNG. https://pug-pupr.pu.go.id/_uploads/PP/UU_no_28_th_2002.pdf
Purnami, N. A., Arianti, R., & Setiawan, P. (2022). Analisis Intensitas Konsumsi Energi (IKE) pada Institut Teknologi Dirgantara Adisutjipto (ITDA) Yogyakarta. AVITEC, 4(2), 225. https://doi.org/10.28989/avitec.v4i2.1325
Sugiyono, A. (2002). Penggunaan Energi dan Pemanasan Global: Prospek bagi Indonesia Perencanaan energi nasional dan daerah View project Energy System Optimization View project. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2755.2646
Widhayaka, S. A., & Rilatupa, J. E. D. (2021). OPTIMALISASI KINERJA TERMAL SELUBUNG BANGUNAN UNIT HUNIAN DI RUSUNAWA CIBESUT JAKARTA TIMUR. MODUL, 21(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.14710/mdl.21.1.2021.43-50
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/lja.v6i2.16613
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Department of Architecture Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Address: Jl. Raya Tengah No. 80, Kel. Gedong, Kec. Pasar Rebo, Jakarta Timur 13760 , Jakarta, Indonesia. |
|