R&D Tahap Assesment: Keefektifan Bahan Ajar Statistik Pendidikan Berbasis LC 5E Berbantu Minitab

Agus Abdillah(1*), Hendro Prasetyono(2), Nur Rizkiyah(3), Dona Fitria(4), Burhanudin Burhanudin(5)

(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(2) Indraprasta PGRI University
(3) Indraprasta PGRI University
(4) Indraprasta PGRI University
(5) Indraprasta PGRI University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


One indicator that learning can be said to be effective is optimal learning outcomes. In fact, to achieve the word "effective" is still far from expectations. These problems cannot be separated from how the lecturers should apply appropriate learning models. This research is the R&D stage of testing the effectiveness of teaching materials using a non-equivalent control group design. The population of all students of the Economic Education Study Program, Indraprasta PGRI University Semester V of the 2020/2021 academic year consists of 31 classes with 1175 students. The sample taken is class S5F (experiment class) as many as 42 people and Class S5E (control class) as many as 43 people. The analysis technique used is the independent t-test. The results of the descriptive analysis showed that the experiment class obtained an average value of learning outcomes that was higher than the control class (80.61 > 74.02). While inductive analysis obtained t_statistic > t_table (4.209 > 1.989). This means that there is a significant difference in learning outcomes between the experiment class and the control class. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Educational Statistics teaching material based LC 5E assisted by Minitab is very effective in its use in learning


Keywords


Hasil Belajar; Learning Cycle; 5E; Minitab

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


Abdillah, A. (2017). Efektivitas Media Pembelajaran dan Minat Belajar Pengaruhnya Terhadap Hasil Belajar Akuntansi Dengan Motivasi Belajar Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Siswa Kelas XI SMK Negeri dan Swasta Di Jakarta Timur. Jupeko (Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi). Vol. 1 No.2. pp. 11-25. ISSN: 2548-6187 https:// doi.org/10.29100/.v1i2.222

Abdillah, A., & Prasetyono, H. (2019). Pengaruh Reinforcement Guru Terhadap Kompetensi Afektif Siswa Sma Jakarta Timur Dalam Meminimalisir Berita Hoax. Research and Development Journal of Education. Vol. 5 (1), 03-10. https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v5i1.3383

Abdillah, A., Sutisna, A., Tarjiah, I., Fitria, D., & Widiyarto, T. (2020). Application of Multinomial Logistic Regression to analyze learning difficulties in statistics courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1490, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1490/1/012012.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2015). Dasar - Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Asmawati, R., & Wuryanto. (2014). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran LC 5E Dan TSTS Berbantuan LKPD Terhadap Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Kreano, Vol. 5 (1) ISSN : 2086-2334. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/kreano/article/viewFile/3274/3219

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P.V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., and Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness, Colorado: Mark Dabling Boulevard.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ergin, I. (2012). Constructivist Approach Based 5E model and Usability Instructional Physics. Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ. Vol. 6, No. 1, 14-20. ISSN 1870-9095. https://www.lajpe.org

Fadirubun, Yana Andriani. (2013). Keefektifan Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5e Berbasis Inkuiri Pada Pencapaian Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP Pada Materi Segi Empat. Skripsi. Tidak dipublikasikan. Semarang: UNNES.

Hamalik, O. (2010). Proses Belajar mengajar. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Hussain, S., Muhsin, Z. F., Salal, Y. K., Theodorou, P., Kurto?lu, F., & Hazarika, G. C. (2019). Prediction model on student performance based on internal assessment using deep learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(8), 4–22. https:// doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i08.10001

Lee, J., Lim, C., & Kim, H. (2017). Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1.

Moule, P. (2007). Challenging the five-stage model for e-learning: a new approach. Alt-J, 15(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687760601129588

Odukoya, J. A., Adekeye, O., & Okunlola, S. (2017). Assessing the Effectiveness of Mobile Learning Devices in Tertiary Institutions: The Experience of Undergraduates in a Nigerian Private University. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 11(4), 160. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i4.6828.

Plomp, T. (2007). Educational Design Research : An Introduction, dalam An Introduction to Educational Research. Enschede, Netherland: National Institute for Curriculum Development.

Prasetyono, H., Abdillah, A., Anita T., Nurfarkhana A., & Sefudin, A. (2020). Identification of the decline in learning outcomes in statistics courses using the chi­squared automatic interaction detection method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1490. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1490/1/012072.

Prasetyono, H., Abdillah, A., Widiarto, T., & Sriyono, H. (2018). Character-based economic learning implementation and teacher’s reinforcement on student’s affective competence in minimizing hoax. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(3), 426-435. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.21583.

Purwanto, M. Ngalim. (2010). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Skalka, J., Drlik, M., & Obonya, J. (2019). Automated assessment in learning and teaching programming languages using virtual learning environment. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.87251 27.

Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaiaan Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suprijono, Agus. (2012). Cooperative Learning : Teori & Aplikasi Paikem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Vhalery, Rendika. (2019). Perbandingan Aktivitas Belajar Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation dan Numbered Head Together. Research and Development Journal Of Education. Vol. 6 (1), 80-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v6i1.4172.

Vhalery, Rendika. (2019). Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Gallery walk dengan Tipe Learning together pada Aktivitas Belajar Peserta Didik di SMA Tri Dharma Palembang. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Ekonomi (JIPE). Vol. 9 (1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.24036/011044950.

Wena, Made. (2012). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Winarno, Muhammad, et al. (2015). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle Berbantuan Lembar Kegiatan Peserta Didik (LKPD) Pada Pokok Bahasan Logika Matematika Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Terisi – Indramayu. EduMa, 4 (2) : 75 – 87. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v4i2.31.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v7i2.10665

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Google Maps

Publisher :

Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Pusat Kajian Ilmu Ekonomi (PUSKANOMI)
Adress : Kampus B | Jl. Raya Tengah No.80, RT.6/RW.1, Gedong, Kec. Ps. Rebo, Kota Jakarta Timur, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 13760
Work Hours : 09.00 AM – 09.00 PM



RDJE Stats

Visitors RDJE (Research and Development Journal of Education) Since March 15'Th 2020
Flag Counter


Lisensi Creative Commons
RDJE (Research and Development Journal of Education) - is licensed under a Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).